| Literature DB >> 33426350 |
Md Shofiqul Islam1, Samiron Sana2,3, Md Ehsanul Haque1, S M Mushiur Rahman3, Abdus Samad1, Abdullah Al Noman1, Rahat Alam1, Sohel Rana3, Rima Islam Meem1, Debashish Mondol3, Md Shariful Islam4, Md Torikul Islam5,6, Kishor Mazumder3,7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tragia involucrata L. have been utilized as traditional medicine in Indian subcontinent for the treatment of numerous illnesses such as inflammation, pain and skin infection. In this current study we sought to assess the anxiolytic, sedative and analgesic activity of Tragia involucrata L. leaves extract.Entities:
Keywords: Analgesic and heavy metal study; Anxiolytic; Phytochemical screening; Sedative; Tragia involucrata L.
Year: 2021 PMID: 33426350 PMCID: PMC7785955 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05814
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
The Phytochemical Screening of n-Hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol extract of Tragia involucrata L. leaves.
| Phytochemical constituents | Name of the test | Observation | Methanol extract | Ethyl Acetate Extract | n-Hexane Extract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenols | FeCl3 test | Brownish green or blue colour | ++ | −− | −− |
| Alkaloids | Mayer's test | Cream colored precipitate | ++ | −− | ++ |
| Flavonoids | FeCl3 test | Intense green color. | ++ | −− | ++ |
| Sterols | Liebermann-Burchard test | Brown ring at junction of two layers and upper layer turns green. | −− | ++ | ++ |
| Carbohydrates | Molisch test | The purple ring at the junction of two liquid. | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| Proteins | Xanthoproteic test | Yellow color precipitate | ++ | −− | −− |
| Tannins | FeCl3 test | Dark color | ++ | −− | −− |
| Saponins | Foam test | Formation of foam. | ++ | −− | −− |
| Glycosides | Raymond's test | Violet color | −− | −− | ++ |
| Terpenoids | Salkowski test | Lower layer turns yellow. | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Note: “++” = Present, “−−” = Absent.
Figure 1Anxiolytic effects of Tragia involucrata L. leaves. (A) Number of open arm entry, (B) Time spent in open arm, (C) Number of close arm entry. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ∗ denotes p < 0.05 vs control, ∗∗ denotes p < 0.01 vs control, ∗∗∗ denotes p < 0.001 vs control (One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett t-test).
Figure 2Impact of Tragia involucrata L. leaves extracts on onset and duration of sleep. (A) Onset of sleep, (B) Duration of sleep. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ∗ denotes p < 0.05 vs control, ∗∗ denotes p < 0.01 vs control, ∗∗∗ denotes p < 0.001 vs control (One Way ANOVA followed by Dunnett t-test).
Figure 3Effects of Tragia involucrata L. leaves extracts on acetic acid induced writhing. (A) Number of writhing, (B) percentage of inhibition. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ∗ denotes p < 0.05 vs control, ∗∗ denotes p < 0.01 vs control, ∗∗∗ denotes p < 0.001 vs control (One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett t-test).
Figure 4Effects of Tragia involucrata L. leaves extracts on formalin-induced paw licking tests. (A) Duration of acute phase, (B) Percentage inhibition of acute phase, (C) Duration of late phase, (D) Percentage inhibition of late phase. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ∗ denotes p < 0.05 vs control, ∗∗ denotes p < 0.01 vs control, ∗∗∗ denotes p < 0.001 vs control (One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett t-test).
Heavy metal analysis of Tragia involucrata L. leaves.
| Name of Heavy Metal | Amount (ppm) |
|---|---|
| Cu | 0.33 ± 0.003 |
| As | 5.16 ± 0.012 |
| Pb | 0.19 ± 0.001 |
| Zn | 0.59 ± 0.001 |
| Fe | 2.76 ± 0.015 |
Data are presented as Mean ± SEM.