Yan Yuan1,2,3, Yi Xiao1,2,3, Xiang Chen1,2,3, Jie Li1,2,3, Minxue Shen1,2,3,4. 1. Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. 2. Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China. 3. Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Central South University, Changsha, China. 4. Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Abstract
Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common recurrent skin disease that adversely affect patient's quality of life condition to treat. Economic evaluations of health care often include patient preferences for health outcomes using utilities. Objectives: The study aimed to determine pooled estimates of utility-based quality of life in patients with CSU. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of peer-reviewed articles and conference papers that published from database inception to 31 April 2019 that reported utility estimates in patients with CSU. Scores reported with the EQ-5D, SF-6D, SF-12, and SF-36 instruments were converted to utilities using published mapping algorithms. Meta-analysis was used to calculate the pooled and meta-regression was used to examine the effects of possible factors. Results: The pooled utility estimate for CSU was 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.70]. The pooled utility estimate that converted from SF-36 or SF-12 was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58-0.74), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.74) for EQ-5D, and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63-0.67) for SF-6D, respectively. According to the meta-regression, higher proportion of female patients was significantly associated lower utility estimates (p = 0.013). Conclusions: The study provides evidence-based utility estimates to inform health-related burden analysis of CSU and reference for the follow-up cost-effectiveness evaluation of chronic spontaneous urticaria intervention. These results highlight differences in common utility-based instruments and need to be cognizant of the specific instruments used when comparing the results of outcome studies.
Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common recurrent skin disease that adversely affect patient's quality of life condition to treat. Economic evaluations of health care often include patient preferences for health outcomes using utilities. Objectives: The study aimed to determine pooled estimates of utility-based quality of life in patients with CSU. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of peer-reviewed articles and conference papers that published from database inception to 31 April 2019 that reported utility estimates in patients with CSU. Scores reported with the EQ-5D, SF-6D, SF-12, and SF-36 instruments were converted to utilities using published mapping algorithms. Meta-analysis was used to calculate the pooled and meta-regression was used to examine the effects of possible factors. Results: The pooled utility estimate for CSU was 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.70]. The pooled utility estimate that converted from SF-36 or SF-12 was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58-0.74), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.74) for EQ-5D, and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63-0.67) for SF-6D, respectively. According to the meta-regression, higher proportion of female patients was significantly associated lower utility estimates (p = 0.013). Conclusions: The study provides evidence-based utility estimates to inform health-related burden analysis of CSU and reference for the follow-up cost-effectiveness evaluation of chronic spontaneous urticaria intervention. These results highlight differences in common utility-based instruments and need to be cognizant of the specific instruments used when comparing the results of outcome studies.