| Literature DB >> 33424341 |
Jalal Taneera1,2, Samir Awadallah3, Abdul Khader Mohammed1, Hema Unnikannan1, Nabil Sulaiman1,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex polygenic disease with unclear mechanisms. Clinical studies on the association of vitamin A with T2D in humans are still controversial. Herein, we aimed to investigate the plasma levels of vitamin A, predictor factors, and its correlations with clinical phenotypes in Emirati population. The effect of glucose-and lipid-lowering medications on vitamin A levels was also studied.Entities:
Keywords: Body mass index; HbA1c; Insulin; Type 2 diabetes; Vitamin A
Year: 2020 PMID: 33424341 PMCID: PMC7783824 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Anthropometric and metabolic characteristics of the recruited subjects.
| Variables | Controls | T2D | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (Male/Female) | 30/60 | 85/73 | < 0.0001 |
| Smokers, n (%) | 5 (4.3) | 18 (11.4) | < 0.0001 |
| Age (Years) | 41.7 ± 8.5 | 53.9 ± 11.9 | < 0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.0 ± 4.7 | 30.9 ± 5.6 | < 0.0001 |
| Waist circumference | 89.2 ± 12.1 | 104.2 ± 13.8 | < 0.0001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 117.3 ± 14.4 | 132.7 ± 21.6 | < 0.0001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 77.6 ± 9.3 | 83.1 ± 11.0 | < 0.0001 |
| Fasting Glucose (mg/dL)# | 92.1 (86–99) | 149.8 (126–205) | < 0.0001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 7.7 ± 1.5 | < 0.0001 |
| HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 52.7 ± 13.8 | 45.1 ± 15.0 | < 0.0001 |
| LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 122.4 ± 34.4 | 111.3 ± 39.1 | 0.023 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL)# | 88.1 (63–129) | 132.7 (106–188) | < 0.0001 |
SBP; systolic blood pressure, DBP; diastolic blood pressure.
Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation for normal continuous variables, #non-Gaussian distribution presented Median (Ist quartile-3rd Quartile). Categorical variables are presented as frequencies (%).
Anthropometric and metabolic characteristics of diabetic subjects only (n = 158).
| Variable | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Sex, male/female | 85/73 |
| Age groups, n (%) | |
| HbA1c, (%) | |
| Duration of Diabetes, n (%) | |
| Glucose lowering medication, n (%) | |
| BMI, n (%) | |
| Normal lipid profile, n (%) | 59 (37.3) |
| Smokers, n (%) | 18 (11.4) |
| Normal Waist circumference, n (%) | 52 (32.9) |
| Normal lipid profile, n (%) | 59 (37.3) |
All the categorical variables are presented as frequencies (%).
Fig. 1Comparison of vitamin A levels in T2D-subjectes (n = 158) compared to healthy controls (n = 90) (A), hyperglycemic subjects (HbA1c greater than 7; n = 145) versus normoglycemic (HbA1c < 7; n = 103) (B), males (n = 115) versus females (n = 133), normotensive-subjects (n = 136) versus hypertensive (n = 99), subjects with normal lipid profile (n = 111) versus abnormal profile (n = 137). P-value denotes groups with significantly different levels of vitamin A.
Fig. 2Spearman’s correlation of vitamin A levels with age (A), FBG (B), HbA1c (C), waist circumference (D), triglycerides (E), HDL-cholesterol (F), LDL-cholesterol (G), BMI (H) analyzed in 248 subjects. R and P values and are indicated in the respective graphs.
Multiple linear regression analysis of serum vitamin A levels.
| Variables | Standardized β ± SE | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Age (Years) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.016 ± 0.017 | 0.85 |
| Waist circumference | −0.150 ± 0.007 | 0.12 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 0.19 ± 0.006 | 0.07 |
| DBP (mmHg) | −0.145 ± 0.01 | 0.13 |
| Fasting Glucose (mg/dL) | 0.026 ± 0.001 | 0.78 |
| HbA1c (%) | ||
| HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 0.087 ± 0.013 | 0.65 |
| LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 0.64 ± 0.014 | 0.19 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.93 |
For multiple regression analysis vitamin A was used as dependent variables. Data presented as beta coefficient ± standard error. P-value < 0.05 considered significant. All non-normal variables were square root or log transformed.
Fig. 3Influence of glucose-lowering medications (subjects were stratified to none medication (n = 76), oral only (n = 45) or combined oral with insulin (n = 37) (A), lipid-lowering medications (subjects were stratified into normal lipid profile with no medication (n = 111), abnormal profile with no medication (n = 83) and abnormal profile with medication (n = 54)) (B) on the levels of vitamin A.