Literature DB >> 33424185

TKA-Revision with maintenance of well-fixed metaphyseal sleeves: Indications and surgical technique.

K Lekkreusuwan1,2, W Scior1, H Graichen1.   

Abstract

Due to the compromised bone situation revision implants need extended fixation options in order to achieve good long-term survival. Over decades this has been achieved with stems, either cemented or uncemented. In the last decade additional fixation options in terms of cementless metaphyseal sleeves or metaphyseal cones have been introduced and widely accepted. Revision of such implants is challenging, in particular if those porous coated parts are well integrated. Therefore, partial revision leaving the well-fixed parts in place can be an option if the indication is allowing it. This can help to preserve bone. In this study we show 2 cases with metaphyseal sleeves, in which we demonstrate when and how revision can be performed leaving sleeves in place. Meticulous pre-Op analysis of the failure mechanism is mandatory to find those few cases in which a partial revision can be recommended. In our cases, it was one patient with persistent tibia stem pain and another patient with secondary instability. In both cases implant fixation was not the problem, and therefore leaving the well-fixed sleeves in place was considered. Before final decision was made, specific information on implants sizes and constraint are needed. In our tibial revision stem thickness was less than 14 mm decision, in this situation the stem can be removed through the sleeve, leaving the sleeve in place. The technique how to do it, is shown in this study. In the second case a traumatic MCL rupture was leading to a secondary instability, needing a revision from a VVC constraint to a rotating hinge. Again, pre-Op analysis and the surgical technique of femoral component removal are described. In the great majority of cases a full revision with complete implant removal is required. In a few cases a partial revision with maintenance of implant parts can be considered but only after careful analysis of the failure mode. Even if the failure mode allows a partial revision specific implant information need to be obtained to clarify whether it is really possible. If it is possible, a specific surgical technique is recommended and described in this study.
© 2020 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Constraint; Instability; Metaphyseal sleeve; Stem pain; TKA-revision

Year:  2020        PMID: 33424185      PMCID: PMC7777497          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  24 in total

Review 1.  Thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Thomas E Brown; Bryan Larson; Frank Shen; Joseph T Moskal
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  [Ligament instability in total knee arthroplasty--causal analysis].

Authors:  H Graichen; M Strauch; T Katzhammer; L Zichner; R von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Is There a Difference between Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stem Extensions in Revision Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Jane Ann O'Dell
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Morgan-Jones; S I S Oussedik; H Graichen; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal Fixation in Knee Revision Arthroplasty With Sleeves-Short-Term Results.

Authors:  Heiko Graichen; Wolfgang Scior; Marco Strauch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

7.  Total knee arthroplasty with fully porous-coated stems for the treatment of large bone defects.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Mid-term results for metaphyseal sleeves in revision knee surgery.

Authors:  Carlos Martin-Hernandez; Luis Javier Floria-Arnal; Maria Pilar Muniesa-Herrero; Teresa Espallargas-Doñate; Jose Adolfo Blanco-Llorca; Melchor Guillen-Soriano; Miguel Ranera-Garcia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Removal of Well-Fixed Tibial Cone in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Uniquely Challenging Yet Necessary Scenario.

Authors:  William F Scully; Matthew E Deren; Assem A Sultan; Linsen T Samuel; William Nageotte; Robert M Molloy; Viktor E Krebs
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Can tibial tantalum cones eventually eliminate the adjuvant use of metallic augments for AORI type 2B/3 metaphyseal defects??-A novel surgical technique and case series.

Authors:  Mohit M Kukreja; Todd V Swanson
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.