Literature DB >> 33423854

The results of a single-center experience with HeartMate 3 in a biventricular configuration.

David McGiffin1, Christina Kure2, Janelle McLean3, Silvana Marasco2, Peter Bergin3, James L Hare3, Angeline Leet3, Hitesh Patel3, Adam Zimmet2, Julia Rix3, Andrew Taylor3, David Kaye3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) failure after left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is a difficult problem. One solution is the implantation of continuous-flow VADs in a biventricular configuration. Disappointing survival and a concerning incidence of right-sided pump thrombosis have been previously reported.
METHODS: From May 2017 to April 2020, a total of 12 patients underwent implantation of HeartMate 3 (HM3) biventricular VADs (BiVADs) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. The right-sided pump was implanted in the right atrium in all cases. Adverse events and patient outcomes were determined.
RESULTS: Patients were male, and the mean age was 44 years. The etiology was dilated cardiomyopathy (6 patients), sarcoid heart disease (2 patients), ischemic cardiomyopathy (1 patient), anthracycline cardiomyopathy (1 patient), non-compaction cardiomyopathy (1 patient), and arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy with biventricular involvement (1 patient). There was 1 death from multisystem failure. There were 3 episodes of right VAD thrombus (thrombosis or clot ingestion); 1 managed medically, 1 recognized intraoperatively treated with clot retrieval, and 1 requiring pump exchange. There were 3 driveline infections. At 18 months after the procedure, 5 patients (41.7%) had undergone cardiac transplantation, 5 patients (41.7%) were alive and on biventricular support, 1 patient had died (8.3%), and 1 patient had VAD explantation for myocardial recovery (8.3%). Actuarial survival at 18 months was 91.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: In this small study, HM3 BiVAD in these critically ill patients was used with low mortality. This suggests that the timely deployment of biventricular support with HM3 can be associated with favorable outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heartmate III; biventricular; cardiomyopathy; mechanical circulatory support; pump thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33423854     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Right Ventricular Failure.

Authors:  Ersilia M DeFilippis; Veli K Topkara; Ajay J Kirtane; Koji Takeda; Yoshifumi Naka; A Reshad Garan
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2022-04-21

2.  Mechanical circulatory support: Technical tips for the implantation of a right ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Evgenij Potapov; Christoph Starck; Volkmar Falk; Jaime-Jürgen Eulert-Grehn
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-10-16

3.  Long-term paracorporeal pulsatile mechanical circulatory support in adolescent and adult patients.

Authors:  Jamila Kremer; Abbas El-Dor; Wiebke Sommer; Ursula Tochtermann; Gregor Warnecke; Matthias Karck; Arjang Ruhparwar; Anna Lassia Meyer
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 4.  Mechanical circulatory support devices and treatment strategies for right heart failure.

Authors:  Taiyo Kuroda; Chihiro Miyagi; Kiyotaka Fukamachi; Jamshid H Karimov
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-23

5.  Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow biventricular assist devices.

Authors:  James Farag; Kei Woldendorp; Nicholas McNamara; Paul G Bannon; Silvana F Marasco; Antonio Loforte; Evgenij V Potapov
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.