Literature DB >> 33423681

Segment length in cine (SLICE) strain analysis: a practical approach to estimate potential benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Alwin Zweerink1, Robin Nijveldt1,2, Natalia J Braams1, Alexander H Maass3, Kevin Vernooy2,4, Frederik J de Lange5, Mathias Meine6, Bastiaan Geelhoed3, Michiel Rienstra3, Isabelle C van Gelder3, Marc A Vos7, Albert C van Rossum1, Cornelis P Allaart8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Segment length in cine (SLICE) strain analysis on standard cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images was recently validated against gold standard myocardial tagging. The present study aims to explore predictive value of SLICE for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) were prospectively enrolled in this multi-center study and underwent CMR examination before CRT implantation. Circumferential strains of the septal and lateral wall were measured by SLICE on short-axis cine images. In addition, timing and strain pattern parameters were assessed. After twelve months, CRT response was quantified by the echocardiographic change in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume (LVESV). In contrast to timing parameters, strain pattern parameters being systolic rebound stretch of the septum (SRSsep), systolic stretch index (SSIsep-lat), and internal stretch factor (ISFsep-lat) all correlated significantly with LVESV change (R - 0.56; R - 0.53; and R - 0.58, respectively). Of all strain parameters, end-systolic septal strain (ESSsep) showed strongest correlation with LVESV change (R - 0.63). Multivariable analysis showed ESSsep to be independently related to LVESV change together with age and QRSAREA.
CONCLUSION: The practicable SLICE strain technique may help the clinician to estimate potential benefit from CRT by analyzing standard CMR cine images without the need for commercial software. Of all strain parameters, end-systolic septal strain (ESSsep) demonstrates the strongest correlation with reverse remodeling after CRT. This parameter may be of special interest in patients with non-strict LBBB morphology for whom CRT benefit is doubted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR); Myocardial strain; Segment length in cine (SLICE)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33423681      PMCID: PMC7798189          DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00701-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  30 in total

1.  2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).

Authors:  Michele Brignole; Angelo Auricchio; Gonzalo Baron-Esquivias; Pierre Bordachar; Giuseppe Boriani; Ole-A Breithardt; John Cleland; Jean-Claude Deharo; Victoria Delgado; Perry M Elliott; Bulent Gorenek; Carsten W Israel; Christophe Leclercq; Cecilia Linde; Lluís Mont; Luigi Padeletti; Richard Sutton; Panos E Vardas
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Septal deformation patterns delineate mechanical dyssynchrony and regional differences in contractility: analysis of patient data using a computer model.

Authors:  Geert E Leenders; Joost Lumens; Maarten J Cramer; Bart W L De Boeck; Pieter A Doevendans; Tammo Delhaas; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Timing of myocardial shortening determines left ventricular regional myocardial work and regional remodelling in hearts with conduction delays.

Authors:  Marta Cvijic; Jürgen Duchenne; Serkan Ünlü; Blazej Michalski; Marit Aarones; Stefan Winter; Svend Aakhus; Wolfgang Fehske; Ivan Stankovic; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Andrew S Flett; Jonathan Hasleton; Christopher Cook; Derek Hausenloy; Giovanni Quarta; Cono Ariti; Vivek Muthurangu; James C Moon
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02

5.  Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial.

Authors:  Eugene S Chung; Angel R Leon; Luigi Tavazzi; Jing-Ping Sun; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John Merlino; William T Abraham; Stefano Ghio; Christophe Leclercq; Jeroen J Bax; Cheuk-Man Yu; John Gorcsan; Martin St John Sutton; Johan De Sutter; Jaime Murillo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Septal rebound stretch reflects the functional substrate to cardiac resynchronization therapy and predicts volumetric and neurohormonal response.

Authors:  Bart W L De Boeck; Arco J Teske; Mathias Meine; Geert E Leenders; Maarten J Cramer; Frits W Prinzen; Pieter A Doevendans
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 15.534

7.  Differentiating Electromechanical From Non-Electrical Substrates of Mechanical Discoordination to Identify Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Joost Lumens; Bhupendar Tayal; John Walmsley; Antonia Delgado-Montero; Peter R Huntjens; David Schwartzman; Andrew D Althouse; Tammo Delhaas; Frits W Prinzen; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Wouter M van Everdingen; Alwin Zweerink; Robin Nijveldt; Odette A E Salden; Mathias Meine; Alexander H Maass; Kevin Vernooy; Frederik J De Lange; Albert C van Rossum; Pierre Croisille; Patrick Clarysse; Bastiaan Geelhoed; Michiel Rienstra; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Marc A Vos; Cornelis P Allaart; Maarten J Cramer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Circumferential myocardial strain in cardiomyopathy with and without left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Yuchi Han; Jonathan Chan; Idith Haber; Dana C Peters; Peter J Zimetbaum; Warren J Manning; Susan B Yeon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  A U-shaped type II contraction pattern in patients with strict left bundle branch block predicts super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Zhong Chen; Nicholas Child; Eva Sammut; Jonathan Behar; Simon Claridge; Gerald Carr-White; Reza Razavi; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 6.343

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying appropriate candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy - a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Jeremy Man Ho Hui; Yan Hiu Athena Lee; Oscar Hou In Chou; Dimitrios Sfairopoulos; Konstantinos Vlachos; Athanasios Saplaouras; Konstantinos P Letsas; Michael Efremidis; Gary Tse; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.654

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.