Literature DB >> 33423632

Non-human primates use combined rules when deciding under ambiguity.

A Romain1, M-H Broihanne2, A De Marco3,4, B Ngoubangoye5, J Call6,7, N Rebout8, V Dufour8.   

Abstract

Decision outcomes in unpredictable environments may not have exact known probabilities. Yet the predictability level of outcomes matters in decisions, and animals, including humans, generally avoid ambiguous options. Managing ambiguity may be more challenging and requires stronger cognitive skills than decision-making under risk, where decisions involve known probabilities. Here we compare decision-making in capuchins, macaques, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos in risky and ambiguous contexts. Subjects were shown lotteries (a tray of potential rewards, some large, some small) and could gamble a medium-sized food item to obtain one of the displayed rewards. The odds of winning and losing varied and were accessible in the risky context (all rewards were visible) or partially available in the ambiguous context (some rewards were covered). In the latter case, the level of information varied from fully ambiguous (individuals could not guess what was under the covers) to predictable (individuals could guess). None of the species avoided gambling in ambiguous lotteries and gambling rates were high if at least two large rewards were visible. Capuchins and bonobos ignored the covered items and gorillas and macaques took the presence of potential rewards into account, but only chimpanzees and orangutans could consistently build correct expectations about the size of the covered rewards. Chimpanzees and orangutans combined decision rules according to the number of large visible rewards and the level of predictability, a process resembling conditional probabilities assessment in humans. Despite a low sample size, this is the first evidence in non-human primates that a combination of several rules can underlie choices made in an unpredictable environment. Our finding that non-human primates can deal with the uncertainty of an outcome when exchanging one food item for another is a key element to the understanding of the evolutionary origins of economic behaviour. This article is part of the theme issue 'Existence and prevalence of economic behaviours among non-human primates'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apes; conditional probability; decision-making; gambling; monkeys; risk

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33423632      PMCID: PMC7815423          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  37 in total

1.  When in doubt, chimpanzees rely on estimates of past reward amounts.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Emily H Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty.

Authors:  Michael L Platt; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Inferences about food location in three cercopithecine species: an insight into the socioecological cognition of primates.

Authors:  Odile Petit; Valérie Dufour; Marie Herrenschmidt; Arianna De Marco; Elisabeth H M Sterck; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Are great apes able to reason from multi-item samples to populations of food items?

Authors:  Johanna Eckert; Hannes Rakoczy; Josep Call
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  Chimpanzees and bonobos distinguish between risk and ambiguity.

Authors:  Alexandra G Rosati; Brian Hare
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus).

Authors:  Josep Call
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Ambiguity aversion in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Sarah R Heilbronner; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Cognitive Processes in Decisions Under Risk are not the Same as in Decisions Under Uncertainty.

Authors:  Kirsten G Volz; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Macaques are risk-averse in a freely moving foraging task.

Authors:  Benjamin R Eisenreich; Benjamin Y Hayden; Jan Zimmermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Nonhuman gamblers: lessons from rodents, primates, and robots.

Authors:  Fabio Paglieri; Elsa Addessi; Francesca De Petrillo; Giovanni Laviola; Marco Mirolli; Domenico Parisi; Giancarlo Petrosino; Marialba Ventricelli; Francesca Zoratto; Walter Adriani
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  2 in total

1.  Exclusion in the field: wild brown skuas find hidden food in the absence of visual information.

Authors:  Samara Danel; Jules Chiffard-Carricaburu; Francesco Bonadonna; Anna P Nesterova
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Economic behaviours among non-human primates.

Authors:  Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde; Elsa Addessi; Thomas Boraud
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.