Literature DB >> 33422733

Rumor has it: How do patients respond to patient-generated physician ratings?

Simon Bensnes1, Ingrid Huitfeldt2.   

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of patient-generated ratings of primary care physicians in Norway. Norway has a universal health care system, with no available objective quality indicators. In May 2012, an online review platform that allows patients to rate their physician was launched. Relying on a difference-in-differences approach we show that higher-rated physicians see an increase in demand relative to lower-rated physicians. The effect is primarily driven by females and patients with high socioeconomic status. We find no indications that physicians change their practice style or supply of patient capacity in response to the ratings.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health care demand; Information asymmetry; Patient-generated ratings

Year:  2020        PMID: 33422733     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  2 in total

1.  Has COVID-19 changed carer's views of health and care integration in care homes? A sentiment difference-in-difference analysis of on-line service reviews.

Authors:  Eduardo Gonzalo Almorox; Jonathan Stokes; Marcello Morciano
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.255

2.  Patient's behavior of selection physician in online health communities: Based on an Elaboration likelihood model.

Authors:  Min Qin; Wei Zhu; Changmeng You; Shuqin Li; Shanshan Qiu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-10-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.