Literature DB >> 33422517

An immediate or early invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: The OPTIMA-2 randomized controlled trial.

Nick D Fagel1, Giovanni Amoroso2, Maarten A Vink2, Ton Slagboom2, René J van der Schaaf2, Jean-Paul Herrman2, Mark S Patterson2, Erik F J Oosterwerff3, Nicola S Vos2, Freek W A Verheugt2, Jan G P Tijssen4, Robbert J de Winter4, Robert K Riezebos2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In intermediate- and high-risk non-ST elevated acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients, a routine invasive approach is recommended. The timing of coronary angiography remains controversial. To assess whether an immediate (<3 hours) invasive treatment strategy would reduce infarct size and is safe, compared with an early strategy (12-24 hours), for patients admitted with NSTE-ACS while preferably treated with ticagrelor.
METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, randomized trial an immediate or early invasive strategy was randomly assigned to patients with NSTE-ACS. At admission, the patients were preferably treated with a combination of aspirin, ticagrelor and fondaparinux. The primary endpoint was the infarct size as measured by area under the curve (AUC) of CK-MB in 48 hours. Secondary endpoints were bleeding outcomes and major adverse cardiac events (MACE): composite of all-cause death, MI and unplanned revascularization. Interim analysis showed futility regarding the primary endpoint and trial inclusion was terminated.
RESULTS: In total 249 patients (71% of planned) were included. The primary endpoint of in-hospital infarct size was a median AUC of CK-MB 186.2 ng/mL in the immediate group (IQR 112-618) and 201.3 ng/mL in the early group (IQR 119-479). Clinical follow-up was 1-year. The MACE-rate was 10% in the immediate and 10% in the early group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% CI: 0.52-2.49).
CONCLUSIONS: In NSTE-ACS patients randomized to either an immediate or an early-invasive strategy the observed median difference in the primary endpoint was about half the magnitude of the expected difference. The trial was terminated early for futility after 71% of the projected enrollment had been randomized into the trial.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33422517     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  3 in total

1.  Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial.

Authors:  Thomas A Kite; Amerjeet S Banning; Andrew Ladwiniec; Chris P Gale; John P Greenwood; Miles Dalby; Rachel Hobson; Shaun Barber; Emma Parker; Colin Berry; Marcus D Flather; Nick Curzen; Adrian P Banning; Gerry P McCann; Anthony H Gershlick
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Timing of invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Thomas A Kite; Sameer A Kurmani; Vasiliki Bountziouka; Nicola J Cooper; Selina T Lock; Chris P Gale; Marcus Flather; Nick Curzen; Adrian P Banning; Gerry P McCann; Andrew Ladwiniec
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 35.855

3.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Shows Improved Outcomes in Patients with an ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and a High Thrombus Burden Treated with Adjuvant Aspiration Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Wojciech Zajdel; Tomasz Miszalski-Jamka; Jarosław Zalewski; Jacek Legutko; Krzysztof Żmudka; Elżbieta Paszek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.