Literature DB >> 33422347

National health disparities in incisional hernia repair outcomes: An analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) 2012-2014.

Ryan D Hoffman1, Denise M Danos2, Frank H Lau3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias represent an acquired defect from failed healing of an abdominal facial incision and are therefore distinct from primary hernias. While literature regarding incisional hernia incidence, risk factors, and treatment are abundant, no study has examined national health disparities specific to incisional hernia repair. The objective of this study was to analyze national health disparities unique to surgical incisional hernia repair procedures.
METHODS: Patient data queried from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2014 using International Classification of Diseases 9th revision procedure codes for incisional hernia repair were used to generate univariate and multivariate models including demographics, socioeconomic factors, admission status, and hospital characteristics. Primary outcomes were nonelective admission status, in-hospital mortality, surgical complications, and extended duration of stay.
RESULTS: We estimated that 89,258 incisional hernia repair procedures occurred annually from 2012 to 2014, incurring $6.3 billion in hospital charges. By multivariate analysis, multiple risk factors contribute to significantly increased odds of nonelective repair. These include age over 65, female sex, non-White race, nonprivate insurance, obesity, and increased Charlson comorbidity index. Nonelective incisional hernia repair was strongly correlated with worse outcomes including in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 3.01 [2.51, 3.61]), postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.2 [1.14, 1.25]), and extended duration of stay (odds ratio 2.96 [2.81, 3.12]). After controlling for admission status, other disparities persisted including extended duration of stay for Black individuals (odds ratio 1.21 (1.12, 1.31]).
CONCLUSION: Providers should be aware of these significant health disparities in incisional hernia repair status and outcomes especially for elderly, non-White, nonprivate insurance, and obese/comorbid patients. Management strategies that increase access to elective repair and that prevent incisional hernia should be expanded to address these disparities.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33422347     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  4 in total

1.  Operative management of non-elective incisional hernia reduces readmission in a national database.

Authors:  J Nigh; D J Wade; G T Rives; S A Karim; A Bhavaraju; M K Kimbrough; R J Reif; K W Sexton; H K Jensen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Disparities in colonoscopy utilization for lower gastrointestinal bleeding in rural vs urban settings in the United States.

Authors:  Nagapratap Ganta; Mina Aknouk; Dina Alnabwani; Ivan Nikiforov; Veera Jayasree Latha Bommu; Vraj Patel; Pramil Cheriyath; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Alan Hamza
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-08-16

3.  Construction and properties of the silk fibroin and polypropylene composite biological mesh for abdominal incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Fengming Luan; Wangbei Cao; Chunhui Cao; Baizhou Li; Xiaoyu Shi; Changyou Gao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-06

4.  The Abdominal Hernia-Q: a critical analysis of the components that impact quality-of-life.

Authors:  G Onyekaba; J T Mauch; V Patel; R B Broach; S Thrippleton; J P Fischer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.920

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.