Željka Večerić-Haler1,2, Špela Borštnar3,4, Boštjan Luzar5, Maja Jerše5, Nika Kojc5. 1. Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. zeljka.veceric@gmail.com. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. zeljka.veceric@gmail.com. 3. Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. 4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. 5. Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unproven stem cell treatments may involve serious health, personal, and financial considerations. Due to worldwide spread, illegal stem cell therapies have become a major public health problem. We have already witnessed numerous reports in the mass media of severe and occasionally even fatal outcomes after such therapies. However, there are only few scientifically documented cases in which the causality between stem cell therapy and side effects cannot be refuted. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present a case report of a 48-year-old patient with serious side effects, including disseminated skin ulcers, hepatitis, and cardiomyopathy, with eventual fatal outcome following unproven stem cell treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The case of the patient presented here draws attention to the worst possible outcome of stem cell tourism. To effectively combat this issue, professionals and patients should be empowered with the right knowledge on possible side effects.
BACKGROUND: Unproven stem cell treatments may involve serious health, personal, and financial considerations. Due to worldwide spread, illegal stem cell therapies have become a major public health problem. We have already witnessed numerous reports in the mass media of severe and occasionally even fatal outcomes after such therapies. However, there are only few scientifically documented cases in which the causality between stem cell therapy and side effects cannot be refuted. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present a case report of a 48-year-old patient with serious side effects, including disseminated skin ulcers, hepatitis, and cardiomyopathy, with eventual fatal outcome following unproven stem cell treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The case of the patient presented here draws attention to the worst possible outcome of stem cell tourism. To effectively combat this issue, professionals and patients should be empowered with the right knowledge on possible side effects.