Almahamoudou Mahamar1, Kjerstin Lanke2, Wouter Graumans2, Halimatou Diawara1, Koualy Sanogo1, Kalifa Diarra1, Sidi Mohamed Niambele1, Roly Gosling3, Chris Drakeley4, Ingrid Chen3, Alassane Dicko1, Teun Bousema5,6, Michelle E Roh3. 1. Malaria Research and Training Centre, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medicine, and Dentistry, University of Science, Techniques, and Technologies of Bamako, Bamako, Mali. 2. Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 26-28, PO Box 9101, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 3. Global Health Group, Malaria Elimination Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Department of Infection & Immunity, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 5. Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 26-28, PO Box 9101, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. teun.bousema@radboudumc.nl. 6. Department of Infection & Immunity, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. teun.bousema@radboudumc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa relies upon prompt case management with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). Ring-stage parasite mRNA, measured by sbp1 quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR), was previously reported to persist after ACT treatment and hypothesized to reflect temporary arrest of the growth of ring-stage parasites (dormancy) following exposure to artemisinins. Here, the persistence of ring-stage parasitaemia following ACT and non-ACT treatment was examined. METHODS: Samples were used from naturally infected Malian gametocyte carriers who received dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP-AQ) with or without gametocytocidal drugs. Gametocytes and ring-stage parasites were quantified by qRT-PCR during 42 days of follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 89% (64/73) of participants had measurable ring-stage parasite mRNA. Following treatment, the proportion of ring-stage parasite-positive individuals and estimated densities declined for all four treatment groups. Ring-stage parasite prevalence and density was generally lower in arms that received DP compared to SP-AQ. This finding was most apparent days 1, 2, and 42 of follow-up (p < 0.01). Gametocytocidal drugs did not influence ring-stage parasite persistence. Ring-stage parasite density estimates on days 14 and 28 after initiation of treatment were higher among individuals who subsequently experienced recurrent parasitaemia compared to those who remained free of parasites until day 42 after initiation of treatment (pday 14 = 0.011 and pday 28 = 0.068). No association of ring-stage persistence with gametocyte carriage was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings of lower ring-stage persistence after ACT without an effect of gametocytocidal partner drugs affirms the use of sbp1 as ring-stage marker. Lower persistence of ring-stage mRNA after ACT treatment suggests the marker may not reflect dormant parasites whilst it was predictive of re-appearance of parasitaemia.
BACKGROUND:Malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa relies upon prompt case management with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). Ring-stage parasite mRNA, measured by sbp1 quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR), was previously reported to persist after ACT treatment and hypothesized to reflect temporary arrest of the growth of ring-stage parasites (dormancy) following exposure to artemisinins. Here, the persistence of ring-stage parasitaemia following ACT and non-ACT treatment was examined. METHODS: Samples were used from naturally infected Malian gametocyte carriers who received dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP-AQ) with or without gametocytocidal drugs. Gametocytes and ring-stage parasites were quantified by qRT-PCR during 42 days of follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 89% (64/73) of participants had measurable ring-stage parasite mRNA. Following treatment, the proportion of ring-stage parasite-positive individuals and estimated densities declined for all four treatment groups. Ring-stage parasite prevalence and density was generally lower in arms that received DP compared to SP-AQ. This finding was most apparent days 1, 2, and 42 of follow-up (p < 0.01). Gametocytocidal drugs did not influence ring-stage parasite persistence. Ring-stage parasite density estimates on days 14 and 28 after initiation of treatment were higher among individuals who subsequently experienced recurrent parasitaemia compared to those who remained free of parasites until day 42 after initiation of treatment (pday 14 = 0.011 and pday 28 = 0.068). No association of ring-stage persistence with gametocyte carriage was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings of lower ring-stage persistence after ACT without an effect of gametocytocidal partner drugs affirms the use of sbp1 as ring-stage marker. Lower persistence of ring-stage mRNA after ACT treatment suggests the marker may not reflect dormant parasites whilst it was predictive of re-appearance of parasitaemia.
Authors: Cristian Koepfli; Sonja Schoepflin; Michael Bretscher; Enmoore Lin; Benson Kiniboro; Peter A Zimmerman; Peter Siba; Thomas A Smith; Ivo Mueller; Ingrid Felger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Steffen Borrmann; Philip Sasi; Leah Mwai; Mahfudh Bashraheil; Ahmed Abdallah; Steven Muriithi; Henrike Frühauf; Barbara Schaub; Johannes Pfeil; Judy Peshu; Warunee Hanpithakpong; Anja Rippert; Elizabeth Juma; Benjamin Tsofa; Moses Mosobo; Brett Lowe; Faith Osier; Greg Fegan; Niklas Lindegårdh; Alexis Nzila; Norbert Peshu; Margaret Mackinnon; Kevin Marsh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Robert W Sauerwein; Teun Bousema; Isaie J Reuling; Lisanne A van de Schans; Luc E Coffeng; Kjerstin Lanke; Lisette Meerstein-Kessel; Wouter Graumans; Geert-Jan van Gemert; Karina Teelen; Rianne Siebelink-Stoter; Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer; Quirijn de Mast; André J van der Ven; Karen Ivinson; Cornelus C Hermsen; Sake de Vlas; John Bradley; Katharine A Collins; Christian F Ockenhouse; James McCarthy Journal: Elife Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Petra Schneider; Megan A Greischar; Philip L G Birget; Charlotte Repton; Nicole Mideo; Sarah E Reece Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Lucy C Okell; Matthew Cairns; Jamie T Griffin; Neil M Ferguson; Joel Tarning; George Jagoe; Pierre Hugo; Mark Baker; Umberto D'Alessandro; Teun Bousema; David Ubben; Azra C Ghani Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 14.919