Bu Ki Kim1, Young Taek Chung2. 1. Onnuri Smile Eye Clinic, Hyobong building 9F 1, Gangnam-daero 65 gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Onnuri Eye Hospital, 325, Baekje-daero, Wansan-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea. ytchungc@daum.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate clinical outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) combined with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism. METHODS: This study comprised 75 eyes of 43 patients with over 4.0 diopters (D) of astigmatism who were treated with SMILE after FTAK. Visual acuities and refractive measurements were evaluated at 1 month after FTAK, and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after SMILE. Vector analysis of the astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins method. RESULTS: Twenty-four months after the combined procedure, the average spherical equivalent was reduced from - 6.56 ± 2.38 D to - 0.36 ± 0.42 D (p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved from 1.54 ± 5.53 to - 0.02 ± 0.09 and from - 0.03 ± 0.07 D to - 0.07 ± 0.08 D (both p < 0.001), respectively. The preoperative mean astigmatism was - 5.48 ± 1.17 D, which was reduced to - 2.27 ± 0.97 D and - 0.34 ± 0.26 D at 1 month after FTAK and 24 months after SMILE, respectively (p < 0.001). The surgically-induced astigmatism after FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 3.38 ± 1.18 D, 2.22 ± 0.84 D, and 5.39 ± 1.20 D, respectively. Furthermore, the correction index of FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.06, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Our surgical procedure combining FTAK and SMILE showed good and stable clinical outcomes during two-year follow-up for the treatment of high astigmatism.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate clinical outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) combined with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism. METHODS: This study comprised 75 eyes of 43 patients with over 4.0 diopters (D) of astigmatism who were treated with SMILE after FTAK. Visual acuities and refractive measurements were evaluated at 1 month after FTAK, and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after SMILE. Vector analysis of the astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins method. RESULTS: Twenty-four months after the combined procedure, the average spherical equivalent was reduced from - 6.56 ± 2.38 D to - 0.36 ± 0.42 D (p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved from 1.54 ± 5.53 to - 0.02 ± 0.09 and from - 0.03 ± 0.07 D to - 0.07 ± 0.08 D (both p < 0.001), respectively. The preoperative mean astigmatism was - 5.48 ± 1.17 D, which was reduced to - 2.27 ± 0.97 D and - 0.34 ± 0.26 D at 1 month after FTAK and 24 months after SMILE, respectively (p < 0.001). The surgically-induced astigmatism after FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 3.38 ± 1.18 D, 2.22 ± 0.84 D, and 5.39 ± 1.20 D, respectively. Furthermore, the correction index of FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.06, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Our surgical procedure combining FTAK and SMILE showed good and stable clinical outcomes during two-year follow-up for the treatment of high astigmatism.
Entities:
Keywords:
Astigmatic keratotomy; Astigmatism; High astigmatism; LRI; Limbal relaxing incision; SMILE; Small incision lenticule extraction