Kathryn Marie Fisher1, Tim Montrief2, Mark Ramzy2, Alex Koyfman3, Brit Long4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3841 Roger Brooke Dr, Fort Sam Houston, TX, 78234, USA. brit.long@yahoo.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cryptococcal Meningitis (CM) remains a high-risk clinical condition, and many patients require emergency department (ED) management for complications and stabilization. OBJECTIVE: This narrative review provides an evidence-based summary of the current data for the emergency medicine evaluation and management of CM. DISCUSSION: This review evaluates the diagnosis, management, and empiric treatment of suspected CM in the ED. CM can easily evade diagnosis with a subacute presentation, and should be considered in any patient with a headache, neurological deficit, or who is immunocompromised. As a definitive diagnosis of CM will not be made in the ED, management of a patient with suspected CM includes prompt diagnostic testing and initiation of empiric treatment. Multiple types of newer Cryptococcal antigen tests provide high sensitivity and specificity both in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Patients should be treated empirically for bacterial, fungal, and viral meningitis, specifically with amphotericin B and flucytosine for presumed CM. Additionally, appropriate resuscitation and supportive care, including advanced airway management, management of increased intracranial pressure (ICP), antipyretics, intravenous fluids, and isolation, should be initiated. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) should not be initiated in the ED for those found or known to be HIV-positive for risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). CONCLUSIONS: CM remains a rare clinical presentation, but carries significant morbidity and mortality. Physicians must rapidly diagnose these patients while evaluating for other diseases and complications. Early consultation with an infectious disease specialist is imperative, as is initiating symptomatic care.
INTRODUCTION: Cryptococcal Meningitis (CM) remains a high-risk clinical condition, and many patients require emergency department (ED) management for complications and stabilization. OBJECTIVE: This narrative review provides an evidence-based summary of the current data for the emergency medicine evaluation and management of CM. DISCUSSION: This review evaluates the diagnosis, management, and empiric treatment of suspected CM in the ED. CM can easily evade diagnosis with a subacute presentation, and should be considered in any patient with a headache, neurological deficit, or who is immunocompromised. As a definitive diagnosis of CM will not be made in the ED, management of a patient with suspected CM includes prompt diagnostic testing and initiation of empiric treatment. Multiple types of newer Cryptococcal antigen tests provide high sensitivity and specificity both in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Patients should be treated empirically for bacterial, fungal, and viral meningitis, specifically with amphotericin B and flucytosine for presumed CM. Additionally, appropriate resuscitation and supportive care, including advanced airway management, management of increased intracranial pressure (ICP), antipyretics, intravenous fluids, and isolation, should be initiated. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) should not be initiated in the ED for those found or known to be HIV-positive for risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). CONCLUSIONS: CM remains a rare clinical presentation, but carries significant morbidity and mortality. Physicians must rapidly diagnose these patients while evaluating for other diseases and complications. Early consultation with an infectious disease specialist is imperative, as is initiating symptomatic care.
Authors: Radha Rajasingham; Rachel M Smith; Benjamin J Park; Joseph N Jarvis; Nelesh P Govender; Tom M Chiller; David W Denning; Angela Loyse; David R Boulware Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Benjamin J Park; Kathleen A Wannemuehler; Barbara J Marston; Nelesh Govender; Peter G Pappas; Tom M Chiller Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: John R Perfect; William E Dismukes; Francoise Dromer; David L Goldman; John R Graybill; Richard J Hamill; Thomas S Harrison; Robert A Larsen; Olivier Lortholary; Minh-Hong Nguyen; Peter G Pappas; William G Powderly; Nina Singh; Jack D Sobel; Tania C Sorrell Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Vasilios Pyrgos; Amy E Seitz; Claudia A Steiner; D Rebecca Prevots; Peter R Williamson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Abdulaziz H Alanazi; Mir S Adil; Xiaorong Lin; Daniel B Chastain; Andrés F Henao-Martínez; Carlos Franco-Paredes; Payaningal R Somanath Journal: Pathogens Date: 2022-07-10
Authors: Petr Kelbich; Karel Hrach; Jan Spicka; Petr Vachata; Tomas Radovnicky; Eva Hanuljakova; Jan Krejsek Journal: Curr Issues Mol Biol Date: 2022-08-14 Impact factor: 2.976