Literature DB >> 33420711

Immediate online use of prosody reveals the ironic intentions of a speaker: neurophysiological evidence.

Maël Mauchand1, Jonathan A Caballero2, Xiaoming Jiang3, Marc D Pell2.   

Abstract

In social interactions, speakers often use their tone of voice ("prosody") to communicate their interpersonal stance to pragmatically mark an ironic intention (e.g., sarcasm). The neurocognitive effects of prosody as listeners process ironic statements in real time are still poorly understood. In this study, 30 participants judged the friendliness of literal and ironic criticisms and compliments in the absence of context while their electrical brain activity was recorded. Event-related potentials reflecting the uptake of prosodic information were tracked at two time points in the utterance. Prosody robustly modulated P200 and late positivity amplitudes from utterance onset. These early neural responses registered both the speaker's stance (positive/negative) and their intention (literal/ironic). At a later timepoint (You are such a great/horrible cook), P200, N400, and P600 amplitudes were all greater when the critical word valence was congruent with the speaker's vocal stance, suggesting that irony was contextually facilitated by early effects from prosody. Our results exemplify that rapid uptake of salient prosodic features allows listeners to make online predictions about the speaker's ironic intent. This process can constrain their representation of an utterance to uncover nonliteral meanings without violating contextual expectations held about the speaker, as described by parallel-constraint satisfaction models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERPs; Irony; Nonliteral meanings; Speech communication; Vocal expression

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420711     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00849-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  26 in total

1.  Emotion, attention, and the 'negativity bias', studied through event-related potentials.

Authors:  L Carretié; F Mercado; M Tapia; J A Hinojosa
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Irony as a game of implicitness: acoustic profiles of ironic communication.

Authors:  L Anolli; R Ciceri; M G Infantino
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-05

Review 3.  Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension.

Authors:  Harm Brouwer; Hartmut Fitz; John Hoeks
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Is there an ironic tone of voice?

Authors:  Gregory A Bryant; Jean E Fox Tree
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Acoustic markers of sarcasm in Cantonese and English.

Authors:  Henry S Cheang; Marc D Pell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.

Authors:  Xiaoming Jiang; Marc D Pell
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension.

Authors:  Francesca Delogu; Harm Brouwer; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Just teasing: a conceptual analysis and empirical review.

Authors:  D Keltner; L Capps; A M Kring; R C Young; E A Heerey
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs.

Authors:  Ruth Filik; Hartmut Leuthold; Katie Wallington; Jemma Page
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing.

Authors:  Harm Brouwer; Matthew W Crocker; Noortje J Venhuizen; John C J Hoeks
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-21
View more
  1 in total

1.  The roles of social status information in irony comprehension: An eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Zixuan Wu; Yuxia Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.