Literature DB >> 33420333

Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of metformin-SGLT2i versus metformin-sulfonylureas in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Desye Gebrie1,2, Desalegn Getnet3, Tsegahun Manyazewal4.   

Abstract

Diabetes is a serious threat to global health and among the top 10 causes of death, with nearly half a billion people living with it worldwide. Treating patients with diabetes tend to become more challenging due to the progressive nature of the disease. The role and benefits of combination therapies for the management of type 2 diabetes are well-documented, while the comparative safety and efficacy among the different combination options have not been elucidated. We aimed to systematically synthesize the evidence on the comparative cardiovascular safety and efficacy of combination therapy with metformin-sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus metformin-sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched MEDLINE-PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 15 August 2019 without restriction in the year of publication. We included randomized controlled trials of patients with type 2 diabetes who were on metformin-sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors or metformin-sulphonylureas combination therapy at least for a year. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and serious adverse events, and the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, hypoglycemia, and changes in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight, fasting plasma glucose, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We used a random-effects meta-analysis model to estimate mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes. We followed PICOS description model for defining eligibility and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 guidelines for reporting results. Of 3,190 citations, we included nine trials involving 10,974 participants. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality (risk ration [RR] = 0.93, 95% CI [0.52, 1.67]), serious adverse events (RR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.79, 1.17]) and adverse events (RR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.99, 1.02]) between the two, but in hypoglycemia (RR = 0.13, 95% CI [0.10, 0.17], P < 0.001). Participants taking metformin-sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors showed a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (mean difference [MD] = - 0.10%, 95% CI [- 0.17, - 0.03], body weight (MD = - 4.57 kg, 95% CI [- 4.74, - 4.39], systolic blood pressure (MD = - 4.77 mmHg, 95% CI [- 5.39, - 4.16]), diastolic blood pressure (MD = - 2.07 mmHg, 95% CI [- 2.74, - 1.40], and fasting plasma glucose (MD = - 0.55 mmol/L, 95% CI [- 0.69, - 0.41]), p < 0.001. Combination therapy of metformin and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors is a safe and efficacious alternative to combination therapy of metformin and sulphonylureas for patients with type 2 diabetes who are at risk of cardiovascular comorbidity. However, there remains a need for additional long-term randomized controlled trials as available studies are very limited and heterogeneous.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420333      PMCID: PMC7794474          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80603-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  75 in total

Review 1.  Impact of SGLT Inhibitors on Multiple Organ Defects in Diabetes.

Authors:  Mohamed Asrih; Karim Gariani
Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev       Date:  2020

2.  The cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus sulfonylurea as an add-on to metformin in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M Charokopou; P McEwan; S Lister; L Callan; K Bergenheim; K Tolley; R Postema; R Townsend; M Roudaut
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Results of VERTIS SU extension study: safety and efficacy of ertugliflozin treatment over 104 weeks compared to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin.

Authors:  Priscilla Hollander; Julie Hill; Jeremy Johnson; Zhi Wei Jiang; Gregory Golm; Susan Huyck; Steven G Terra; James P Mancuso; Samuel S Engel; Brett Lauring; Jie Liu
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.580

4.  Factors associated with physicians' decision to discontinue or down-titrate sulfonylureas for type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Pedro Laires; Karen Kurtyka; Edward A Witt; Ying Qiu; Shengsheng Yu; Kristy Iglay
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Durability of glycaemic efficacy over 2 years with dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapies in patients whose type 2 diabetes mellitus is inadequately controlled with metformin.

Authors:  M A Nauck; S Del Prato; S Durán-García; K Rohwedder; A M Langkilde; J Sugg; S J Parikh
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 6.577

6.  Comparison of empagliflozin and glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 104-week randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Martin Ridderstråle; Knut Robert Andersen; Cordula Zeller; Gabriel Kim; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 32.069

7.  A Safety Comparison of Metformin vs Sulfonylurea Initiation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Reid H Whitlock; Ingrid Hougen; Paul Komenda; Claudio Rigatto; Kristin K Clemens; Navdeep Tangri
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control with metformin: a randomized, 52-week, double-blind, active-controlled noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Michael A Nauck; Stefano Del Prato; Juris J Meier; Santiago Durán-García; Katja Rohwedder; Martina Elze; Shamik J Parikh
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Combination Therapy with an SGLT2 Inhibitor as Initial Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tamara Y Milder; Sophie L Stocker; Christina Abdel Shaheed; Lucy McGrath-Cadell; Dorit Samocha-Bonet; Jerry R Greenfield; Richard O Day
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Review of the cardiovascular safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the clinical relevance of the CAROLINA trial.

Authors:  Marile Santamarina; Curt J Carlson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.298

View more
  3 in total

1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials comparing sulfonylureas and low hypoglycaemic risk antidiabetic drugs.

Authors:  Vallo Volke; Urmeli Katus; Annika Johannson; Karolin Toompere; Keiu Heinla; Kertu Rünkorg; Anneli Uusküla
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.263

Review 2.  A Critical Review of the Evidence That Metformin Is a Putative Anti-Aging Drug That Enhances Healthspan and Extends Lifespan.

Authors:  Ibrahim Mohammed; Morley D Hollenberg; Hong Ding; Chris R Triggle
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Metformin treatment is associated with improved outcome in patients with diabetes and advanced heart failure (HFrEF).

Authors:  Jan Benes; Martin Kotrc; Katerina Kroupova; Peter Wohlfahrt; Jan Kovar; Janka Franekova; Marketa Hegarova; Lenka Hoskova; Eva Hoskova; Terezie Pelikanova; Petr Jarolim; Josef Kautzner; Vojtech Melenovsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.