Literature DB >> 33420271

Evaluating the course of the saphenous vein and nerve for risk assessment in the suture button technique.

Tomo Hamada1, Hidenori Matsubara2, Toshifumi Hikichi1, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya1.   

Abstract

The suture button technique can cause damage to the saphenous vein and nerve. We examined the location and course of the great saphenous vein using magnetic resonance imaging and determined its position at 10, 20, 30, or 40 mm proximal to the tibial plafond. We divided the region from the anterior to the posteromedial tibial edges into segments A, B, C, D, and E, and compared baseline data and vein parameters between 56 healthy (group H) and 296 symptomatic limbs (group D). At 10, 20, 30, and 40 mm proximal to the tibial plafond, segments A (53.4%), B (45.7%), C (50.0%), and D (52.6%), respectively, had the highest probability of the presence of the great saphenous vein. The mean angle of the great saphenous vein from the distal anterior to the proximal posterior side of the tibia in relation to the tibial axis was 32.4° ± 4.8°. There were no significant differences between groups H and D. These findings indicate that the position of the saphenous vein and nerve should be determined prior to performing the suture button technique on the medial side of the tibia. This can be achieved under direct visualization through a small skin incision or via ultrasound.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420271      PMCID: PMC7794578          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80556-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  15 in total

1.  Assessment of Anatomic Risk During Syndesmotic Stabilization With the Suture Button Technique.

Authors:  Kelly M Pirozzi; Corine L Creech; Andrew J Meyr
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 1.286

2.  The saphenous nerve in foot and ankle surgery: its variable anatomy and relevance.

Authors:  Daniel Marsland; A Dray; N J Little; M C Solan
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.705

3.  Suture Button Fixation Versus Syndesmotic Screws in Supination-External Rotation Type 4 Injuries: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Kaitlin C Neary; Matthew A Mormino; Hongmei Wang
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Comparison of different fixation methods of the suture-button implant for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries.

Authors:  Atsushi Teramoto; Daisuke Suzuki; Tomoaki Kamiya; Takako Chikenji; Kota Watanabe; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures.

Authors:  Brad Weening; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Iatrogenic syndesmosis malreduction via clamp and screw placement.

Authors:  Anna N Miller; David P Barei; Joseph M Iaquinto; William R Ledoux; Daphne M Beingessner
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  H Claude Sagi; Anjan R Shah; Roy W Sanders
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Suture-button versus screw fixation in a syndesmosis rupture model: a biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Sandeep P Soin; Trevor A Knight; A Feroz Dinah; Simon C Mears; Bart A Swierstra; Stephen M Belkoff
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Forceps reduction of the syndesmosis in rotational ankle fractures: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Phinit Phisitkul; Thomas Ebinger; Jessica Goetz; Tanawat Vaseenon; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

Authors:  Pei Zhang; Yuan Liang; Jinshan He; Yongchao Fang; Pengtao Chen; Jingcheng Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.