Literature DB >> 33420201

Urban life promotes delayed dispersal and family living in a non-social bird species.

Álvaro Luna1, Nicolás A Lois2,3, Sol Rodríguez-Martinez4, Antonio Palma1, Ana Sanz-Aguilar5,6, José L Tella1, Martina Carrete7.   

Abstract

In some vertebrate species, family units are typically formed when sexually mature individuals delay dispersal and independent breeding to remain as subordinates in a breeding group. This behaviour has been intensively studied in gregarious species but has also been described in non-social species where ecological and evolutionary drivers are less known. Here, we explore factors that favour delayed dispersal and family living and potential benefits associated with this strategy in a non-social, monogamous species (the burrowing owl, Athene cunicularia) occupying urban and rural habitats. Our results show that family units arise when first-year individuals, mainly males, delay their dispersal to stay in their natal nests with their parents. This delayed dispersal, while still uncommon, was more prevalent in urban (7%) than in rural (3%) habitats, and in areas with high conspecific density and productivity. Birds delaying dispersal contributed to the genetic pool of the offspring in 25% of the families analysed, but did not increase the productivity of the nests where they remained. However, their presence was related to an improvement in the body condition of chicks, which was ultimately linked to a slightly positive effect in offspring future survival probabilities. Finally, delayed dispersers were recruited as breeders in high-quality urban territories and closer to their natal nests than individuals dispersing during their first year of life. Thus, our results suggest that delaying dispersal may be mainly related to opportunities to inheriting a good quality territory, especially for males. Our study contributes to understanding the role played by habitat quality in promoting delayed dispersal and family living, not only in social but also non-social species, highlighting its impact in the ecology and evolution of animal populations.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420201      PMCID: PMC7794495          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80344-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  56 in total

1.  Anthropogenic resource subsidies decouple predator-prey relationships.

Authors:  Amanda D Rodewald; Laura J Kearns; Daniel P Shustack
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  The evolution of social philopatry and dispersal in female mammals.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; D Lukas
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 3.  Costs of dispersal.

Authors:  Dries Bonte; Hans Van Dyck; James M Bullock; Aurélie Coulon; Maria Delgado; Melanie Gibbs; Valerie Lehouck; Erik Matthysen; Karin Mustin; Marjo Saastamoinen; Nicolas Schtickzelle; Virginie M Stevens; Sofie Vandewoestijne; Michel Baguette; Kamil Barton; Tim G Benton; Audrey Chaput-Bardy; Jean Clobert; Calvin Dytham; Thomas Hovestadt; Christoph M Meier; Steve C F Palmer; Camille Turlure; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-09-19

Review 4.  REVIEW: Can habitat selection predict abundance?

Authors:  Mark S Boyce; Chris J Johnson; Evelyn H Merrill; Scott E Nielsen; Erling J Solberg; Bram van Moorter
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Gene flow and genetic drift in urban environments.

Authors:  Lindsay S Miles; L Ruth Rivkin; Marc T J Johnson; Jason Munshi-South; Brian C Verrelli
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Individual dispersal delays in a cooperative breeder: Ecological constraints, the benefits of philopatry and the social queue for dominance.

Authors:  Martha J Nelson-Flower; Elizabeth M Wiley; Tom P Flower; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Conspecific cues and breeding habitat selection in an endangered woodland warbler.

Authors:  Shannon L Farrell; Michael L Morrison; Andrew J Campomizzi; R Neal Wilkins
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Urban conservation hotspots: predation release allows the grassland-specialist burrowing owl to perform better in the city.

Authors:  Natalia Rebolo-Ifrán; José L Tella; Martina Carrete
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cities may save some threatened species but not their ecological functions.

Authors:  Álvaro Luna; Pedro Romero-Vidal; Fernando Hiraldo; Jose L Tella
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  High individual consistency in fear of humans throughout the adult lifespan of rural and urban burrowing owls.

Authors:  Martina Carrete; José L Tella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls.

Authors:  Ángeles Sáez-Ventura; Antonio J López-Montoya; Álvaro Luna; Pedro Romero-Vidal; Antonio Palma; José L Tella; Martina Carrete; Gracia M Liébanas; Jesús M Pérez
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.