| Literature DB >> 33420062 |
Natalie N Kinloch1,2, Yanqin Ren3, Winiffer D Conce Alberto3, Winnie Dong2, Pragya Khadka3, Szu Han Huang3, Talia M Mota3, Andrew Wilson4, Aniqa Shahid1,2, Don Kirkby2, Marianne Harris2,5, Colin Kovacs6, Erika Benko6, Mario A Ostrowski7, Perla M Del Rio Estrada8, Avery Wimpelberg9, Christopher Cannon9, W David Hardy9, Lynsay MacLaren9, Harris Goldstein10, Chanson J Brumme2,5, Guinevere Q Lee3, Rebecca M Lynch4, Zabrina L Brumme11,12, R Brad Jones13,14.
Abstract
The Intact Proviral DNA Assay (IPDA) was developed to address the critical need for a scalable method for intact HIV-1 reservoir quantification. This droplet digital PCR-based assay simultaneously targets two HIV-1 regions to distinguish genomically intact proviruses against a large background of defective ones, and its application has yielded insights into HIV-1 persistence. Reports of assay failures however, attributed to HIV-1 polymorphism, have recently emerged. Here, we describe a diverse North American cohort of people with HIV-1 subtype B, where the IPDA yielded a failure rate of 28% due to viral polymorphism. We further demonstrate that within-host HIV-1 diversity can lead the IPDA to underestimate intact reservoir size, and provide examples of how this phenomenon could lead to erroneous interpretation of clinical trial data. While the IPDA represents a major methodological advance, HIV-1 diversity should be addressed before its widespread adoption as a principal readout in HIV-1 remission trials.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33420062 PMCID: PMC7794580 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20442-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919