Literature DB >> 33419887

Proteinase release from activated neutrophils in mechanically ventilated patients with non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 pneumonia.

Seda Seren1, Lohann Derian1,2, Irem Keleş1,3,2, Antoine Guillon1,4, Adam Lesner5, Loïc Gonzalez1, Thomas Baranek1, Mustapha Si-Tahar1, Sylvain Marchand-Adam1,6, Dieter E Jenne7, Christophe Paget1, Youenn Jouan1,4, Brice Korkmaz1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33419887      PMCID: PMC8082325          DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03755-2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Severe cases of pneumonia are frequently associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which carries a mortality rate of about 40% [1]. Uncontrolled host inflammatory response in the lung is a key factor in the transition from pneumonia to ARDS, with alveolocapillary membrane disruption leading to interstitial and alveolar oedema [2]. Neutrophils are part of the innate immune system and are the first responders to local tissue damage and infection. Recruited neutrophils are considered important actors in lung tissue injury [3]. Indeed, their broad arsenal of antimicrobial weaponry can cause direct and indirect collateral damage. Neutrophil serine proteinases (NSPs), including elastase (NE), proteinase 3 (PR3) and cathepsin G (CatG), are released from activated cells and play a part in ARDS pathophysiology, as illustrated in both preclinical and clinical studies [4]. Thus, NSPs emerge as an untapped point for therapeutic interventions in pneumonia-induced ARDS [4]. These NSPs are readily synthesised in neutrophil precursors within the bone marrow and are converted into their active form by cathepsin C (CatC) [5]. They are stored together in cytoplasmic granules and secreted into the extracellular compartment upon stimulation [6]. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), can lead to pneumonia with lung hyper-inflammation [7] and, in the most severe cases, to ARDS [8]. However, there are some controversies regarding the clinical presentation and pathophysiology of COVID-19-induced ARDS, as compared to ARDS associated with other microbial infections. In this regard, investigation of the potential role of neutrophils in COVID-19 ARDS is only in its infancy [9-11]. In an attempt to fill this knowledge gap, we investigated neutrophilic inflammation by studying NSPs in endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) and blood collected from mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia-driven ARDS of non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 aetiology. CatC, identified as a biomarker of neutrophil degranulation [6] and pro-inflammatory NSPs were analysed using enzymatic and immunological methods in concentrated ETA supernatants and sera. To our knowledge, this study is the first to compare the concentrations of proteolytically active CatC and NSPs in samples from patients with distinct pneumonia-related ARDS, including with COVID-19 aetiology. Patients from non-COVID-19 ARDS (n=15) and COVID-19 ARDS (n=17) presented similar clinical characteristics at admission. Median (interquartile range) age was 62 (57–66.5) years for the non-COVID-19 ARDS group and 64 (59–70) for the COVID-19 ARDS group, with a percentage of males of 60% and 65%, respectively. Median neutrophil count in the blood of the non-COVID-19 group was 8.7 (6.6–13.7) ×109 L−1 and 6.4 (6.0–7.6) ×109 L−1 for the COVID-19 group. All patients met the criteria for ARDS, and median arterial oxygen tension/inspired oxygen fraction ratio at the time of analysis was <200 in both groups (and >100), denoting moderate severity: 197 (158–250) for the non-COVID-19 ARDS group and 162 (117–215) for the COVID-19 ARDS group. Microbial identification, using multiplex PCR and/or conventional cultures on ETA samples, was obtained in 13/15 of the non-COVID-19 patients: influenza A or B (n=8), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=1), rhinovirus (n=2), respiratory syncytial virus (n=1), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (n=1) and three patients with influenza were co-infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae or Streptococcus pneumoniae and Aspergillus fumigatus. Flow cytometry analysis of the cellular content of ETAs showed that neutrophils (live CD45+/CD14−/CD16+ cells) accounted for the vast majority of leukocytes in the airways of pneumonia-related ARDS and, of note, no significant difference between the two groups was found (non-COVID-19 ARDS: 95±0.7%; COVID-19 ARDS: 94±0.9%, p=0.16) (figure 1a). ETA neutrophils from the two groups expressed similar amount of surface activation marker CD16 (mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for non-COVID-19 ARDS: 19930±2617; MFI for COVID-19 ARDS: 20057±2112, p=0.7340; Mann–Whitney test). Myeloperoxidase (MPO), a marker of neutrophil activation, was detected in all ETA samples of non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 ARDS patients, with mean concentrations of 1148±102 ng·mL−1 and 1218±111 ng·mL−1 respectively, and no significant difference in concentration between the two groups (p=0.63) (figure 1b). CatC activity was detected in ETA samples of 14 non-COVID-19 ARDS patients (93%; 2.6±0.8 ng·mL−1) and 14 COVID-19 ARDS patients (82%; 8±2.8 ng·mL−1) with no significant difference in concentration between the two groups (p=0.39) (figure 1c). CatC activity was assayed using a CatC-selective FRET substrate [12] in the presence or absence of a selective CatC inhibitor (figure 1d). The 20-kDa heavy chain of CatC, representing the fully processed proteolytically active subunit of the proteinase, was detected by Western blotting using an antibody against CatC in a subset of the non-COVID-19 ARDS group ETA samples. When measured activity levels were low (figure 1d), this was reflected by an absence of the heavy chain band in the corresponding blot (figure 1e). Detection of proteolytically active CatC indicates the presence of activated neutrophils with granule release and consequently NSPs at inflammatory sites.
FIGURE 1

Neutrophils and proteolytically active proteinases in endotracheal aspirates (ETAs). Schematic of the workflow is shown above. ETAs collected from mechanically ventilated non-COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ARDS patients from intensive care unit were weighed and incubated in PBS (5 mL·g−1) with 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 30 min at 4°C under gentle agitation. After centrifugation, supernatants were collected and then concentrated five times before total protein quantification by the BCA or Bradford assay. Cell pellets were filtered through a 100 µm cell strainer. Red blood cells were removed using a red blood cell lysis buffer and then cell suspensions from ETAs were passed through a 40 µm cell strainer prior to staining for flow cytometry. a) Cells were stained with antibodies against surface markers (CD45, CD14 and CD16) and viability dye. Neutrophils were defined as live CD45+ CD14− CD16+ cells. Neutrophil relative proportion in ETAs of all non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients is represented as percentage of live leukocytes (CD45+ cells). Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Mann–Whitney test. b) Quantitative detection of myeloperoxidase (MPO) in ETA supernatants (dilution: 1/500) from 14 non-COVID-19 ARDS and 14 COVID-19 ARDS patients using a human MPO Elisa kit (DMYE00B, R&D Systems). Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Mann–Whitney test. c) The concentration of active cathepsin C (CatC) was estimated by comparison of the rate of hydrolysis of FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) substrate by ETA supernatants of all non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients and recombinant CatC. Each point represents data of two independent experiments, both in duplicate, from an individual subject. Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Mann–Whitney test. d) The CatC activity in five times concentrated ETA supernatants (4 µg protein) was measured spectrofluorometrically at 460 nm with or without the nitrile inhibitor (L)-Thi-(L)-Phe-CN (0.5 µM final, 20 min incubation at 37°C) using Thi-Ala(Mca)-Ser-Gly-Tyr(3-NO2)-NH2 (20 µM final) as selective FRET substrate. The residual activities were inhibited by the CatC inhibitor (L)-Thi-(L)-Phe-CN which demonstrate the presence of CatC activity in samples. Inhibition experiments were performed with all ETA samples used in the study. Results with ETA samples from 13 non-COVID-19 ARDS are shown. Data represent the mean±sd of two independent experiments, both performed with duplicates of the same sample. Similar results were obtained with ETA supernatants of all COVID-19 ARDS patients. FU: fluorescence unit. e) Western blotting (WB) of concentrated ETA supernatants (30 µg of protein) from 13 non-COVID-19 ARDS (no 1–13) using an anti-CatC antibody (sc-74590, 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) shows the presence of the CatC heavy chain. Similar results were obtained with ETA supernatants of all non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients in three independent experiments. f) The proteinase 3 (PR3) activity in ETA supernatants was measured at 420 nm with or without the PR3 inhibitor Ac-PYDAP(O-C6H6-4-Cl)2 (0.5 µM final, 20 min incubation at 37°C) using ABZ-VAD(nor)VADYQ-EDDnp (20 µM final) as a substrate. g) CatG activity in ETA supernatants was measured in the presence or absence of alpha-1-antichymotrypsin using ABZ-TPFSGQ-EDDnp (20 µM final) as a substrate. h) The neutrophil elastase (NE) activity in ETA supernatants was measured with or without NE inhibitor EPI-hNE-4 (0.5 µM final, 20 min incubation at 37°C) using ABZ-APEEIMRRQ-EDDnp as a substrate. The residual activities in ETA samples were inhibited by selective NSP inhibitors demonstrating the specificity of the FRET assays utilised. Inhibition experiments were performed with all ETA samples used in the study. Each point represents data of two independent experiments, both in duplicate, from an individual subject. Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Mann–Whitney test. i) Quantitative detection of circulating NE. A human NE ELISA kit (HK319, HycultBiotech) was used for the quantitative detection of NE in sera (dilution: 1/100) from 10 non-COVID-19 ARDS and 10 COVID-19 ARDS patients. Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Kruskal–Wallis test. ns: nonsignificant.

Neutrophils and proteolytically active proteinases in endotracheal aspirates (ETAs). Schematic of the workflow is shown above. ETAs collected from mechanically ventilated non-COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ARDS patients from intensive care unit were weighed and incubated in PBS (5 mL·g−1) with 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 30 min at 4°C under gentle agitation. After centrifugation, supernatants were collected and then concentrated five times before total protein quantification by the BCA or Bradford assay. Cell pellets were filtered through a 100 µm cell strainer. Red blood cells were removed using a red blood cell lysis buffer and then cell suspensions from ETAs were passed through a 40 µm cell strainer prior to staining for flow cytometry. a) Cells were stained with antibodies against surface markers (CD45, CD14 and CD16) and viability dye. Neutrophils were defined as live CD45+ CD14CD16+ cells. Neutrophil relative proportion in ETAs of all non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients is represented as percentage of live leukocytes (CD45+ cells). Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Mann–Whitney test. b) Quantitative detection of myeloperoxidase (MPO) in ETA supernatants (dilution: 1/500) from 14 non-COVID-19 ARDS and 14 COVID-19 ARDS patients using a human MPO Elisa kit (DMYE00B, R&D Systems). Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Mann–Whitney test. c) The concentration of active cathepsin C (CatC) was estimated by comparison of the rate of hydrolysis of FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) substrate by ETA supernatants of all non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients and recombinant CatC. Each point represents data of two independent experiments, both in duplicate, from an individual subject. Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Mann–Whitney test. d) The CatC activity in five times concentrated ETA supernatants (4 µg protein) was measured spectrofluorometrically at 460 nm with or without the nitrile inhibitor (L)-Thi-(L)-Phe-CN (0.5 µM final, 20 min incubation at 37°C) using Thi-Ala(Mca)-Ser-Gly-Tyr(3-NO2)-NH2 (20 µM final) as selective FRET substrate. The residual activities were inhibited by the CatC inhibitor (L)-Thi-(L)-Phe-CN which demonstrate the presence of CatC activity in samples. Inhibition experiments were performed with all ETA samples used in the study. Results with ETA samples from 13 non-COVID-19 ARDS are shown. Data represent the mean±sd of two independent experiments, both performed with duplicates of the same sample. Similar results were obtained with ETA supernatants of all COVID-19 ARDS patients. FU: fluorescence unit. e) Western blotting (WB) of concentrated ETA supernatants (30 µg of protein) from 13 non-COVID-19 ARDS (no 1–13) using an anti-CatC antibody (sc-74590, 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) shows the presence of the CatC heavy chain. Similar results were obtained with ETA supernatants of all non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients in three independent experiments. f) The proteinase 3 (PR3) activity in ETA supernatants was measured at 420 nm with or without the PR3 inhibitor Ac-PYDAP(O-C6H6-4-Cl)2 (0.5 µM final, 20 min incubation at 37°C) using ABZ-VAD(nor)VADYQ-EDDnp (20 µM final) as a substrate. g) CatG activity in ETA supernatants was measured in the presence or absence of alpha-1-antichymotrypsin using ABZ-TPFSGQ-EDDnp (20 µM final) as a substrate. h) The neutrophil elastase (NE) activity in ETA supernatants was measured with or without NE inhibitor EPI-hNE-4 (0.5 µM final, 20 min incubation at 37°C) using ABZ-APEEIMRRQ-EDDnp as a substrate. The residual activities in ETA samples were inhibited by selective NSP inhibitors demonstrating the specificity of the FRET assays utilised. Inhibition experiments were performed with all ETA samples used in the study. Each point represents data of two independent experiments, both in duplicate, from an individual subject. Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Mann–Whitney test. i) Quantitative detection of circulating NE. A human NE ELISA kit (HK319, HycultBiotech) was used for the quantitative detection of NE in sera (dilution: 1/100) from 10 non-COVID-19 ARDS and 10 COVID-19 ARDS patients. Individuals are depicted. The data represent mean±sem. Kruskal–Wallis test. ns: nonsignificant. The selective and specific FRET substrates designed for each NSP [13] allowed their identification as active proteinases in ETA from patients (figure 1f–h). A reduction of NSP activities was achieved in our samples with purified alpha-1-antitrypsin, a natural serpin inhibitor of NSPs in human plasma. In this way, we were able to exclude the presence of active NSPs as a component of alpha-2-macroglobulin complexes, which encage, but still contain, the active proteinases. NSPs were detected in most samples also containing mature CatC (72%). NSP activity was detected in ETA of 12 non-COVID-19 ARDS patients (80%) and 14 COVID-19 ARDS patients (82%). We estimated the concentration of active NSPs from the rate of substrate hydrolysis using purified NSPs (non-COVID-19 ARDS group: PR3 14.8±4.4 ng·mL−1, NE 29.9±9.6 ng·mL−1, CatG 23.6±8.2 ng·mL−1; COVID-19 ARDS group: PR3 10.2±2.9 ng·mL−1, NE 16±6.2 ng·mL−1, CatG 23.7±11.7 ng·mL−1). We found no significant difference in the total concentration of the three NSPs between the non-COVID-19 ARDS group and COVID-19 ARDS (68.4±19.7 ng·mL−1 of ETA and 49.9±20.2 ng·mL−1 of ETA, respectively, p=0.52). Individual analysis of the three NSPs did not reveal any difference between non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups (figure 1f–h). The variation observed in NSP concentrations could be explained by neutrophil counts in the airways, their degranulation status and the level of active extracellular inhibitors. Last, we explored circulating NSP concentration in the serum of non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 patients and compared them to healthy donors (n=10). Because of huge amounts of serpins in sera, it was not possible to detect any proteolytic activity using NSP selective FRET substrates, despite their high sensitivity. We used an ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) that was particularly sensitive for detection of free NE and complexed NE with alpha-1-antitrypsin. There was no significant difference in NE serum concentration between non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups (280±29 ng·mL−1 of serum and 273±32 ng·mL−1 of serum, respectively, p=1) as assayed by ELISA (n=10) (figure 1i). However, NE concentration in both groups was significantly higher compared to healthy donors (median (interquartile range) age was 59 (54–63.5) years; male/female ratio was 2/1, n=10) (107±3.5 ng·mL−1 of serum; p<0.001, Kruskal–Wallis test). Specific identification and detection of proteolytically active NSPs in acute inflammatory lung diseases is an important starting point to infer the simultaneous inhibition of multiple NSPs as a useful and effective therapeutic approach. By analysing ETA samples, we present strong circumstantial evidence for the involvement of NSPs in pneumonia-driven ARDS, in both non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 patients. It should, however, be kept in mind that pneumonia-driven ARDS is an alveolar process and that ETA sampling does not precisely reflect the unfolding inflammatory process in the alveolar compartment. Despite these technical limitations, our study strongly suggests that COVID-19 ARDS is associated with the release of biologically active NSPs into the small airways at a comparable level as observed in non-COVID-19 ARDS. It is thought that elevated levels of NSPs overwhelm the endogenous shield of natural inhibitors. In addition, we identified active CatC, the critical enzyme stored together with mature NSPs in primary granules of neutrophils, in ETA samples of non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 ARDS patients. Although no major difference between the two groups was found, we cannot exclude a difference below the limited statistical power of the study due to small numbers of patients. Since our observations have been made on a limited number of patients and because neutrophils may be involved in different detrimental processes in COVID-19 pathophysiology (including diffuse alveolar damage, thrombosis and microangiopathy [10]), we have not been able so far to establish a clear relationship between the outcome of pneumonia-driven ARDS patients and NSPs activities. Taken together, our data strongly encourage further mechanistic studies with regard to the precise contribution of NSPs in pneumonia-driven ARDS and strongly support initiatives to evaluate the therapeutic potential and efficacy of CatC inhibitors in COVID-19 to eliminate NSPs already at an early phase of the disease [4]. In this regard, the outcome of an ongoing clinical trial with brensocatib, a reversible nitrile CatC inhibitor approved in a phase 2 clinical study [14], is eagerly awaited by health professionals, scientists and currently affected patients (STOP-COVID19, Superiority Trial of Protease Inhibition in COVID-19, EudraCT number 2020-001643-13 [4]). Brensocatib treatment may help prevent irreversible pulmonary failure of COVID-19 patients with high level of active NSPs. Clinical trial results from the STOP-COVID-19 study will help us to better understand NSP-dependent pathophysiology of neutrophils in COVID-19. This one-page PDF can be shared freely online. Shareable PDF ERJ-03755-2020.Shareable
  14 in total

1.  Measuring elastase, proteinase 3 and cathepsin G activities at the surface of human neutrophils with fluorescence resonance energy transfer substrates.

Authors:  Brice Korkmaz; Sylvie Attucci; Maria Aparecida Juliano; Timofey Kalupov; Marie-Lise Jourdan; Luiz Juliano; Francis Gauthier
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  B Taylor Thompson; Rachel C Chambers; Kathleen D Liu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Therapeutic targeting of cathepsin C: from pathophysiology to treatment.

Authors:  Brice Korkmaz; George H Caughey; Iain Chapple; Francis Gauthier; Josefine Hirschfeld; Dieter E Jenne; Ralph Kettritz; Gilles Lalmanach; Anne-Sophie Lamort; Conni Lauritzen; Monika Łȩgowska; Adam Lesner; Sylvain Marchand-Adam; Sarah J McKaig; Celia Moss; John Pedersen; Helen Roberts; Adrian Schreiber; Seda Seren; Nalin S Thakker
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Development of the first internally-quenched fluorescent substrates of human cathepsin C: The application in the enzyme detection in biological samples.

Authors:  Monika Łęgowska; Yveline Hamon; Anna Wojtysiak; Renata Grzywa; Marcin Sieńczyk; Timo Burster; Brice Korkmaz; Adam Lesner
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.013

5.  Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy.

Authors:  Giacomo Grasselli; Alberto Zangrillo; Alberto Zanella; Massimo Antonelli; Luca Cabrini; Antonio Castelli; Danilo Cereda; Antonio Coluccello; Giuseppe Foti; Roberto Fumagalli; Giorgio Iotti; Nicola Latronico; Luca Lorini; Stefano Merler; Giuseppe Natalini; Alessandra Piatti; Marco Vito Ranieri; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Enrico Storti; Maurizio Cecconi; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Neutrophilic Cathepsin C Is Maturated by a Multistep Proteolytic Process and Secreted by Activated Cells during Inflammatory Lung Diseases.

Authors:  Yveline Hamon; Monika Legowska; Virginie Hervé; Sandrine Dallet-Choisy; Sylvain Marchand-Adam; Lise Vanderlynden; Michèle Demonte; Rich Williams; Christopher J Scott; Mustapha Si-Tahar; Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc'h; Gilles Lalmanach; Dieter E Jenne; Adam Lesner; Francis Gauthier; Brice Korkmaz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Pulmonary immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 infection: harmful or not?

Authors:  A Guillon; P S Hiemstra; M Si-Tahar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Neutrophils and COVID-19: Nots, NETs, and knots.

Authors:  Carl Nathan
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 9.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Rob Mac Sweeney; Daniel F McAuley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Lung Protection by Cathepsin C Inhibition: A New Hope for COVID-19 and ARDS?

Authors:  Brice Korkmaz; Adam Lesner; Sylvain Marchand-Adam; Celia Moss; Dieter E Jenne
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  8 in total

1.  Investigating the Link between Alpha-1 Antitrypsin and Human Neutrophil Elastase in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid of COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Maura D'Amato; Valentina Vertui; Laura Pandolfi; Sara Bozzini; Tommaso Fossali; Riccardo Colombo; Anna Aliberti; Marco Fumagalli; Paolo Iadarola; Camilla Didò; Simona Viglio; Federica Meloni
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.976

2.  Differential Functional Responses of Neutrophil Subsets in Severe COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Kenneth R McLeish; Rejeena Shrestha; Aruna Vashishta; Madhavi J Rane; Michelle T Barati; Michael E Brier; Mario Gutierrez Lau; Xiaoling Hu; Oscar Chen; Caitlin R Wessel; Travis Spalding; Sarah E Bush; Kenechi Ijemere; C Danielle Hopkins; Elizabeth A Cooke; Shweta Tandon; Terri Manning; Silvia M Uriarte; Jiapeng Huang; Jun Yan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 3.  Neutrophil Functional Heterogeneity and Implications for Viral Infections and Treatments.

Authors:  Lily Chan; Solmaz Morovati; Negar Karimi; Kasra Alizadeh; Sierra Vanderkamp; Julia E Kakish; Byram W Bridle; Khalil Karimi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.666

4.  Atypical response to bacterial coinfection and persistent neutrophilic bronchoalveolar inflammation distinguish critical COVID-19 from influenza.

Authors:  Seppe Cambier; Mieke Metzemaekers; Ana Carolina de Carvalho; Amber Nooyens; Cato Jacobs; Lore Vanderbeke; Bert Malengier-Devlies; Mieke Gouwy; Elisabeth Heylen; Philippe Meersseman; Greet Hermans; Els Wauters; Alexander Wilmer; Dominique Schols; Patrick Matthys; Ghislain Opdenakker; Rafael Elias Marques; Joost Wauters; Jennifer Vandooren; Paul Proost
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-01-11

5.  Dipeptidyl peptidase-1 inhibition in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Holly R Keir; Merete B Long; Hani Abo-Leyah; Yan Hui Giam; Thenmalar Vadiveloo; Thomas Pembridge; Rebecca C Hull; Lilia Delgado; Margaret Band; Fiona McLaren-Neil; Simon Adamson; Eva Lahnsteiner; Amy Gilmour; Chloe Hughes; Benjamin Jm New; David Connell; Rebecca Dowey; Helena Turton; Hollian Richardson; Diane Cassidy; Jamie Cooper; Jay Suntharalingam; Lavanya Diwakar; Peter Russell; Jonathan Underwood; Alexander Hicks; Davinder Ps Dosanjh; Beth Sage; Devesh Dhasmana; Mark Spears; Aa Roger Thompson; Christopher Brightling; Andrew Smith; Manish Patel; Jacob George; Alison M Condliffe; Amelia Shoemark; Graeme MacLennan; James D Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 102.642

6.  Is neutrophilic inflammation treatable in COVID-19?

Authors:  Catharina Conrad; Mark R Looney
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 102.642

Review 7.  The roles of cellular protease interactions in viral infections and programmed cell death: a lesson learned from the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Martyna Majchrzak; Marcin Poręba
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 8.  Neutrophils and COVID-19: Active Participants and Rational Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Jon Hazeldine; Janet M Lord
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 7.561

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.