Literature DB >> 33419862

Using Head-Mounted Ethanol Sensors to Monitor Olfactory Information and Determine Behavioral Changes Associated with Ethanol-Plume Contact during Mouse Odor-Guided Navigation.

Mohammad F Tariq1,2,3, Suzanne M Lewis2, Aliena Lowell2, Sidney Moore2, Jesse T Miles1,2, David J Perkel4,3, David H Gire5,3.   

Abstract

Olfaction guides navigation and decision-making in organisms from multiple animal phyla. Understanding how animals use olfactory cues to guide navigation is a complicated problem for two main reasons. First, the sensory cues used to guide animals to the source of an odor consist of volatile molecules, which form plumes. These plumes are governed by turbulent air currents, resulting in an intermittent and spatiotemporally varying olfactory signal. A second problem is that the technologies for chemical quantification are cumbersome and cannot be used to detect what the freely moving animal senses in real time. Understanding how the olfactory system guides this behavior requires knowing the sensory cues and the accompanying brain signals during navigation. Here, we present a method for real-time monitoring of olfactory information using low-cost, lightweight sensors that robustly detect common solvent molecules, like alcohols, and can be easily mounted on the heads of freely behaving mice engaged in odor-guided navigation. To establish the accuracy and temporal response properties of these sensors we compared their responses with those of a photoionization detector (PID) to precisely controlled ethanol stimuli. Ethanol-sensor recordings, deconvolved using a difference-of-exponentials kernel, showed robust correlations with the PID signal at behaviorally relevant time, frequency, and spatial scales. Additionally, calcium imaging of odor responses from the olfactory bulbs (OBs) of awake, head-fixed mice showed strong correlations with ethanol plume contacts detected by these sensors. Finally, freely behaving mice engaged in odor-guided navigation showed robust behavioral changes such as speed reduction that corresponded to ethanol plume contacts.
Copyright © 2021 Tariq et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; foraging; navigation; olfaction; sensory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33419862      PMCID: PMC7877453          DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0285-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  eNeuro        ISSN: 2373-2822


  23 in total

Review 1.  Physical processes and real-time chemical measurement of the insect olfactory environment.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Riffell; Leif Abrell; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Sniff-synchronized, gradient-guided olfactory search by freely moving mice.

Authors:  Teresa M Findley; David G Wyrick; Jennifer L Cramer; Morgan A Brown; Blake Holcomb; Robin Attey; Dorian Yeh; Eric Monasevitch; Nelly Nouboussi; Isabelle Cullen; Jeremea O Songco; Jared F King; Yashar Ahmadian; Matthew C Smear
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  Review of Gravimetric Sensing of Volatile Organic Compounds.

Authors:  Christine K McGinn; Zachary A Lamport; Ioannis Kymissis
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 7.711

4.  Developmental Dysfunction of VIP Interneurons Impairs Cortical Circuits.

Authors:  Renata Batista-Brito; Martin Vinck; Katie A Ferguson; Jeremy T Chang; David Laubender; Gyorgy Lur; James M Mossner; Victoria G Hernandez; Charu Ramakrishnan; Karl Deisseroth; Michael J Higley; Jessica A Cardin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Rats smell in stereo.

Authors:  Raghav Rajan; James P Clement; Upinder S Bhalla
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Simultaneous Denoising, Deconvolution, and Demixing of Calcium Imaging Data.

Authors:  Eftychios A Pnevmatikakis; Daniel Soudry; Yuanjun Gao; Timothy A Machado; Josh Merel; David Pfau; Thomas Reardon; Yu Mu; Clay Lacefield; Weijian Yang; Misha Ahrens; Randy Bruno; Thomas M Jessell; Darcy S Peterka; Rafael Yuste; Liam Paninski
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Metal oxide gas sensors: sensitivity and influencing factors.

Authors:  Chengxiang Wang; Longwei Yin; Luyuan Zhang; Dong Xiang; Rui Gao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Thy1-GCaMP6 transgenic mice for neuronal population imaging in vivo.

Authors:  Hod Dana; Tsai-Wen Chen; Amy Hu; Brenda C Shields; Caiying Guo; Loren L Looger; Douglas S Kim; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico, and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking.

Authors:  A Gumaste; G Coronas-Samano; J Hengenius; R Axman; E G Connor; K L Baker; B Ermentrout; J P Crimaldi; J V Verhagen
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-02-04

10.  Olfactory Detection Thresholds for Primary Aliphatic Alcohols in Mice.

Authors:  Ellie Williams; Adam Dewan
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.