Zixuan Wu1, Longhui Qiu2, Chang Wang1, Xiaomian Liu1, Qihao Li1, Shuangjin Yu1, Yuan Yue1, Jie Li2, Wutao Chen2, Jiajian Lai2, Lizhong Chen1, Changxi Wang3, Guodong Chen4. 1. Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China. 2. Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 3. Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: wcx6363@163.com. 4. Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: chenguodong2000@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Active antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR), particularly late aABMR, remains a major challenge for long-term renal allograft survival. This single-center retrospective study aimed to compare clinical features between early vs late aABMR and to identify risk factors for allograft failure among patients with aABMR. METHOD: Forty-one patients diagnosed with aABMR at our hospital were included and were divided into 2 groups: early aABMR (≤6 months; n = 10) vs late aABMR (>6 months; n = 31) based on the time from transplant to diagnosis. Their clinical and pathologic data were compared. This study was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul. RESULTS: Of 10 patients with early aABMR, none had allograft failure, whereas 8 of 31 patients with late aABMR had developed allograft failure at the time of follow-up (25.8%). At the time of biopsy, patients with early aABMR had higher positive grade in urine occult blood test than patients with late aABMR (P = .01); however, the late aABMR group displayed more intensive interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (P = .03) and more frequent HLA-DQ-type donor-specific antibodies. Interestingly, donor-specific antibody conversion from positive to negative was not associated with C4d grade but was correlated with time from transplant to biopsy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high levels of serum creatinine or proteinuria and concomitant T-cell-mediated rejection were independent risk factors for allograft failure in patients with aABMR. CONCLUSION: These data not only confirm that early aABMR has better clinical outcomes than late aABMR but highlight the importance of early diagnostic biopsy and early therapeutic interventions in ABMR, particularly in patients with high levels of serum creatinine or proteinuria in the early posttransplant phase.
OBJECTIVE: Active antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR), particularly late aABMR, remains a major challenge for long-term renal allograft survival. This single-center retrospective study aimed to compare clinical features between early vs late aABMR and to identify risk factors for allograft failure among patients with aABMR. METHOD: Forty-one patients diagnosed with aABMR at our hospital were included and were divided into 2 groups: early aABMR (≤6 months; n = 10) vs late aABMR (>6 months; n = 31) based on the time from transplant to diagnosis. Their clinical and pathologic data were compared. This study was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul. RESULTS: Of 10 patients with early aABMR, none had allograft failure, whereas 8 of 31 patients with late aABMR had developed allograft failure at the time of follow-up (25.8%). At the time of biopsy, patients with early aABMR had higher positive grade in urine occult blood test than patients with late aABMR (P = .01); however, the late aABMR group displayed more intensive interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (P = .03) and more frequent HLA-DQ-type donor-specific antibodies. Interestingly, donor-specific antibody conversion from positive to negative was not associated with C4d grade but was correlated with time from transplant to biopsy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high levels of serum creatinine or proteinuria and concomitant T-cell-mediated rejection were independent risk factors for allograft failure in patients with aABMR. CONCLUSION: These data not only confirm that early aABMR has better clinical outcomes than late aABMR but highlight the importance of early diagnostic biopsy and early therapeutic interventions in ABMR, particularly in patients with high levels of serum creatinine or proteinuria in the early posttransplant phase.
Authors: Kennedy Sun; Pamela Singer; Abby Basalely; Lawrence Lau; Laura Castellanos; Ahmed E Fahmy; Lewis W Teperman; Ernesto P Molmenti; Elliot I Grodstein; Christine B Sethna Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2022-05-09
Authors: Suzanne Bezstarosti; Cynthia S M Kramer; Marry E I Franke-van Dijk; Manon Vergunst; Kim H Bakker; Merve Uyar-Mercankaya; Rico Buchli; Dave L Roelen; Johan W de Fijter; Frans H J Claas; Sebastiaan Heidt Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 7.561