| Literature DB >> 33419456 |
David Leasa1,2, Paul Cameron1,2, Kimia Honarmand1,2, Tina Mele1,2, Karen J Bosma3,4.
Abstract
Providing optimal care to patients with acute respiratory illness while preventing hospital transmission of COVID-19 is of paramount importance during the pandemic; the challenge lies in achieving both goals simultaneously. Controversy exists regarding the role of early intubation versus use of non-invasive respiratory support measures to avoid intubation. This review summarizes available evidence and provides a clinical decision algorithm with risk mitigation techniques to guide clinicians in care of the hypoxemic, non-intubated, patient during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although aerosolization of droplets may occur with aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMP), including high flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation, the risk of using these AGMP is outweighed by the benefit in carefully selected patients, particularly if care is taken to mitigate risk of viral transmission. Non-invasive support measures should not be denied for conditions where previously proven effective and may be used even while there is suspicion of COVID-19 infection. Patients with de novo acute respiratory illness with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 may also benefit. These techniques may improve oxygenation sufficiently to allow some patients to avoid intubation; however, patients must be carefully monitored for signs of increased work of breathing. Patients showing signs of clinical deterioration or high work of breathing not alleviated by non-invasive support should proceed promptly to intubation and invasive lung protective ventilation strategy. With adherence to these principles, risk of viral spread can be minimized.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; High flow nasal oxygen; Non-invasive ventilation; Prone positioning; ROX index
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33419456 PMCID: PMC7791165 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03415-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097