Literature DB >> 33419279

Does Sex Dimorphism Exist in Dysfunctional Movement Patterns during the Sensitive Period of Adolescence?

Josip Karuc1, Mario Jelčić2, Maroje Sorić1, Marjeta Mišigoj-Duraković1, Goran Marković1,2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate sex difference in the functional movement in the adolescent period. Seven hundred and thirty adolescents (365 boys) aged 16-17 years participated in the study. The participants performed standardized Functional Movement Screen™ (FMSTM) protocol and a t-test was used to examine sex differences in the total functional movement screen score, while the chi-square test was used to determine sex differences in the proportion of dysfunctional movement and movement asymmetries within the individual FMSTM tests. Girls demonstrated higher total FMSTM score compared to boys (12.7 ± 2.3 and 12.2 ± 2.4, respectively; p = 0.0054). Sex differences were present in several individual functional movement patterns where boys demonstrated higher prevalence of dysfunctional movement compared to girls in patterns that challenge mobility and flexibility of the body (inline lunge: 32% vs. 22%, df = 1, p = 0.0009; shoulder mobility: 47% vs. 26%, df = 1, p < 0.0001; and active straight leg raise: 31% vs. 9%, df = 1, p < 0.0001), while girls underperformed in tests that have higher demands for upper-body strength and abdominal stabilization (trunk stability push-up: 81% vs. 44%, df = 1, p < 0.0001; and rotary stability: 54% vs. 44%, df = 1, p = 0.0075). Findings of this study suggest that sex dimorphisms exist in functional movement patterns in the period of mid-adolescence. The results of this research need to be considered while using FMSTM as a screening tool, as well as the reference standard for exercise intervention among the secondary school-aged population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FMSTM; functional movement; fundamental movement patterns; gender difference; maturation; pubescence

Year:  2020        PMID: 33419279      PMCID: PMC7766915          DOI: 10.3390/children7120308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Children (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9067


  36 in total

1.  A systematic review of the evidence for Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults.

Authors:  Darren Er Warburton; Sarah Charlesworth; Adam Ivey; Lindsay Nettlefold; Shannon Sd Bredin
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.457

2.  The functional movement screening (fms)™: an inter-rater reliability study between raters of varied experience.

Authors:  Heather Gulgin; Barbara Hoogenboom
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-02

3.  Fatness and fitness in relation to functional movement quality in overweight and obese children.

Authors:  Pablo Molina-Garcia; Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Irene Esteban-Cornejo; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Maria Rodriguez-Ayllon; Abel Plaza-Florido; Alejandro Molina-Molina; Gabriel Garcia-Delgado; Eva D'Hondt; Jos Vanrenterghem; Francisco B Ortega
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Is there any relationship between functional movement and weight status? A study in Spanish school-age children.

Authors:  Felipe García-Pinillos; Luis E Roche-Seruendo; Pedro Delgado-Floody; Daniel Jerez Mayorga; Pedro Á Latorre-Román
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.057

5.  General joint laxity in 1845 Swedish school children of different ages: age- and gender-specific distributions.

Authors:  A Jansson; T Saartok; S Werner; P Renström
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.299

6.  Muscle assessment in healthy teenagers, Comparison with teenagers with low back pain.

Authors:  J-C Bernard; R Bard; A Pujol; A Combey; D Boussard; C Begue; A M Salghetti
Journal:  Ann Readapt Med Phys       Date:  2008-05-08

7.  Developmental evidence for obstetric adaptation of the human female pelvis.

Authors:  Alik Huseynov; Christoph P E Zollikofer; Walter Coudyzer; Dominic Gascho; Christian Kellenberger; Ricarda Hinzpeter; Marcia S Ponce de León
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen; Scott W Shaffer; Chelsea L Lorenson; Joshua P Halfpap; Dustin F Donofry; Michael J Walker; Jessica L Dugan; John D Childs
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ in YOUTH SPORT PARTICIPANTS: EVALUATING the PROFICIENCY BARRIER for INJURY.

Authors:  Craig E Pfeifer; Ryan S Sacko; Andrew Ortaglia; Eva V Monsma; Paul F Beattie; Justin Goins; David F Stodden
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-06

10.  Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study).

Authors:  Lars Bo Andersen; Maarike Harro; Luis B Sardinha; Karsten Froberg; Ulf Ekelund; Søren Brage; Sigmund Alfred Anderssen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Child Injury Prevention: It Is Time to Address the Determinants of Health.

Authors:  Amy E Peden; Richard C Franklin
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-14

Review 2.  Assessment of Dysfunctional Movements and Asymmetries in Children and Adolescents Using the Functional Movement Screen-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Pat R Vehrs; Martina Uvacsek; Aaron W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.