Literature DB >> 33419236

Animal Welfare and Meat Quality Assessment in Gas Stunning during Commercial Slaughter of Pigs Using Hypercapnic-Hypoxia (20% CO2 2% O2) Compared to Acute Hypercapnia (90% CO2 in Air).

Sophie Atkinson1, Bo Algers1, Joaquim Pallisera2, Antonio Velarde2, Pol Llonch2,3.   

Abstract

This study assessed aversion, stunning effectiveness, and product quality of nitrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2) mixtures used for stunning pigs. A total of 1852 slaughter pigs divided into two similar batches was assessed during routine slaughter in a Swedish commercial abattoir using either hypercapnic-hypoxia (20% CO2 and less than 2% O2; 20C2O) or hypercapnia (90% CO2; 90C) gas mixtures. Behavioral indicators of aversion and discomfort were recorded. After exposure, the stunning quality was assessed through brainstem reflexes. After slaughter, the pH and electric conductivity of carcasses were assessed to estimate the incidence of pale, soft, and exudative (PSE) pork, and the presence of ecchymosis were inspected. Compared to 90C, pigs exposed to 20C2O showed a later (p < 0.05) onset of behaviors indicative of aversion, and a lower (p < 0.01) incidence of breathlessness. However, unconsciousness (i.e., losing posture) appeared earlier (p < 0.01) in 90C compared to 20C2O. In 90C, all (100%) pigs were adequately stunned, whereas in 20C2O a 7.4% of pigs showed signs of poor stunning, especially when oxygen concentrations were >2% (p < 0.001). The percentage of PSE carcasses was higher (p < 0.01) in 20C2O than 90C. In conclusion, compared to 90C, 20C2O reduced aversion and discomfort but showed lower stun effectiveness, especially when O2 was above 2%, and a slightly poorer pork quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; carbon dioxide; hypercapnia; hypercapnic-hypoxia; meat quality; nitrogen; pigs; slaughter; stunning

Year:  2020        PMID: 33419236      PMCID: PMC7766013          DOI: 10.3390/ani10122440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  18 in total

1.  CO(2) stunning may compromise swine welfare compared with electrical stunning.

Authors:  M Becerril-Herrera; M Alonso-Spilsbury; C Lemus-Flores; I Guerrero-Legarreta; A Olmos-Hernández; R Ramírez-Necoechea; D Mota-Rojas
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  The effect of stunning method on the incidence of PSE meat and haemorrhages in pork carcasses.

Authors:  A Velarde; M Gispert; L Faucitano; X Manteca; A Diestre
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part I. Neurobiological mechanisms underlying stunning and killing.

Authors:  Claudia Terlouw; Cécile Bourguet; Véronique Deiss
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Stunning pigs with nitrogen and carbon dioxide mixtures: effects on animal welfare and meat quality.

Authors:  P Llonch; P Rodríguez; M Gispert; A Dalmau; X Manteca; A Velarde
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of different carbon dioxide concentrations and exposure times in stunning of slaughter pigs: Impact on animal welfare and meat quality.

Authors:  B Nowak; T V Mueffling; J Hartung
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  An assessment of carbon dioxide stunning in pigs.

Authors:  N G Gregory; B W Moss; R H Leeson
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1987-11-28       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Welfare implications of gas stunning pigs: 3. The time to loss of somatosensory evoked potentials and spontaneous electrocorticogram of pigs during exposure to gases.

Authors:  A B Raj; S P Johnson; S B Wotton; J L McInstry
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.688

8.  Time to Loss of Consciousness and Its Relation to Behavior in Slaughter Pigs during Stunning with 80 or 95% Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Merel Verhoeven; Marien Gerritzen; Antonio Velarde; Ludo Hellebrekers; Bas Kemp
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-19

9.  Alternatives to Carbon Dioxide-Taking Responsibility for Humanely Ending the Life of Animals.

Authors:  Shannon Axiak Flammer; Chantra Eskes; Ingrid Kohler; Awilo Ochieng Pernet; Peter Jakob; Michael Marahrens; Thomas C Gent; Huw Golledge; Dan Weary
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Behavioral Response of Weaned Pigs during Gas Euthanasia with CO2, CO2 with Butorphanol, or Nitrous Oxide.

Authors:  Enver Çavuşoğlu; Jean-Loup Rault; Richard Gates; Donald C Lay
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.752

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing Gas and Electrical Stunning: Effects on Meat Quality of Pigs when Pre-Stunning Physical Activity is Minimal.

Authors:  E M Claudia Terlouw; Véronique Deiss; Thierry Astruc
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-02-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.