Literature DB >> 33419196

Evaluation of Winter Footwear: Comparison of Test Methods to Determine Footwear Slip Resistance on Ice Surfaces.

Atena Roshan Fekr1,2, Yue Li1, Chantal Gauvin3, Gordon Wong1, Wayne Cheng1, Geoff Fernie1,2, Tilak Dutta1,2.   

Abstract

The use of slip-resistant winter footwear is crucial for the prevention of slips and falls on ice and snow. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate a mechanical testing method to determine footwear slip resistance on wet and dry ice surfaces and to compare it with the human-centred test method introduced by researchers at KITE (Knowledge, Innovation, Talent, Everywhere)-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network. Phase 1 of this study assessed the repeatability and reproducibility of the mechanical method by evaluating ten different occupational winter boots using two SATRA Slip resistance testers (STM 603, SATRA Technology Centre, Kettering, UK). One tester is located in Toronto and one in Montreal. These boots were chosen based on the needs of the IRSST (Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail, Montréal, Quebec, Canada), who were primarily interested in providing safe winter footwear for police, firefighters and municipal workers. In Phase 2, the results of the human-centred test approach were compared with the mechanical results. In Phase 3, two of these boots with conflicting results from the previous phases were tested using a second human-centred method. In Phase 1, the mechanical testing results obtained in the two labs showed a high linear correlation (>0.94) and good agreement on both ice surfaces; however, they revealed a bias (~0.06) between the two labs on the dry ice condition. The mechanical and human-centred tests (phase 2) were found to be better correlated in the wet ice condition (R = 0.95) compared to the dry ice condition (R = 0.34). Finally, the rating of the footwear slip resistance based on the number of slips counted in phase 3 was consistent with the rating by the human-centred test method (phase 2), but not the mechanical method (phase 1). The findings of this study provide a better understanding of the limitations of the SATRA ice tray for measuring footwear slip resistance and demonstrate that the mechanical method must be further refined to make it more comparable to the human-centred methods to achieve better agreement with real-world performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SATRA; fall; footwear; ice; maximum achievable angle; slip; slip resistance; winter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33419196      PMCID: PMC7825554          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  20 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of slipperiness: fundamental concepts and definitions.

Authors:  R Grönqvist; W R Chang; T K Courtney; T B Leamon; M S Redfern; L Strandberg
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  A systems perspective of slip and fall accidents on icy and snowy surfaces.

Authors:  Chuansi Gao; John Abeysekera
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  The effect of conditions underfoot on falling and overexertion accidents.

Authors:  L Strandberg
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Human-centred approaches in slipperiness measurement.

Authors:  R Grönqvist; J Abeysekera; G Gard; S M Hsiang; T B Leamon; D J Newman; K Gielo-Perczak; T E Lockhart; C Y Pai
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Predicting slips based on the STM 603 whole-footwear tribometer under different coefficient of friction testing conditions.

Authors:  Kurt E Beschorner; Arian Iraqi; Mark S Redfern; Rakié Cham; Yue Li
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  The cost of fall related presentations to the ED: a prospective, in-person, patient-tracking analysis of health resource utilization.

Authors:  J C Woolcott; K M Khan; S Mitrovic; A H Anis; C A Marra
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Outdoor falls in an urban context: winter weather impacts and geographical variations.

Authors:  Patrick Morency; Corinne Voyer; Stephanie Burrows; Sophie Goudreau
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2012 May-Jun

Review 8.  Socioeconomic and behavioural risk factors for adverse winter health and social outcomes in economically developed countries: a systematic review of quantitative observational studies.

Authors:  Louise M Tanner; Suzanne Moffatt; Eugene M G Milne; Susanna D H Mills; Martin White
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Slip resistance and wearability of safety footwear used on icy surfaces for outdoor municipal workers.

Authors:  Z Shaghayegh Bagheri; Nidhi Patel; Yue Li; Kayla Morrone; Geoff Fernie; Tilak Dutta
Journal:  Work       Date:  2019

10.  Slip resistance of winter footwear on snow and ice measured using maximum achievable incline.

Authors:  Jennifer Hsu; Robert Shaw; Alison Novak; Yue Li; Marcus Ormerod; Rita Newton; Tilak Dutta; Geoff Fernie
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and Evaluation of a Slip Detection Algorithm for Walking on Level and Inclined Ice Surfaces.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Cen; Tilak Dutta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.