Zhiwei Zhai1, Kunning Zhang2, Chen Wang1, Tian Zhang3, Lixia Wang4, Jiannan Yao5, Zhenjun Wang1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100020, China. 2. Department of Pathology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China. 3. Department of Radiotherapy, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China. 5. Department of Oncology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: the total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (TNT) includes different strategies, but the most appropriate model remains uncertain. The purpose of this retrospectively study was to evaluate the safety and pathological response in the consolidation chemotherapy model. METHODS: patients with cT3/T4 or TxN + M0 rectal cancer that were receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (50 Gy with oral capecitabine)/TNT (CRT followed by three cycles of CAPOX) during September 2017 to September 2019 in our department were included. All of the patients were recommended to receive radical surgery. RESULTS: a total of 197 patients were included. Eighty-one patients received CRT, while one hundred and sixteen patients received TNT. Nine patients did not undergo surgery because of the distant metastases (one patient (1.2%) in CRT group, two patients (1.7%) in TNT group) or a refusal of resection (two patients in CRT group, four patients in TNT group). The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 32.7% in TNT compared with 12.8% in CRT (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in grade 3 acute toxicities of neoadjuvant treatment and surgical complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: the consolidation chemotherapy model is safe for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and it has a high pCR rate. The long-term follow-up is necessary to be evaluated in a future prospective, randomized trial.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: the total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (TNT) includes different strategies, but the most appropriate model remains uncertain. The purpose of this retrospectively study was to evaluate the safety and pathological response in the consolidation chemotherapy model. METHODS:patients with cT3/T4 or TxN + M0 rectal cancer that were receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (50 Gy with oral capecitabine)/TNT (CRT followed by three cycles of CAPOX) during September 2017 to September 2019 in our department were included. All of the patients were recommended to receive radical surgery. RESULTS: a total of 197 patients were included. Eighty-one patients received CRT, while one hundred and sixteen patients received TNT. Nine patients did not undergo surgery because of the distant metastases (one patient (1.2%) in CRT group, two patients (1.7%) in TNT group) or a refusal of resection (two patients in CRT group, four patients in TNT group). The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 32.7% in TNT compared with 12.8% in CRT (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in grade 3 acute toxicities of neoadjuvant treatment and surgical complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: the consolidation chemotherapy model is safe for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and it has a high pCR rate. The long-term follow-up is necessary to be evaluated in a future prospective, randomized trial.
Authors: Anne J Breugom; Marloes Swets; Jean-François Bosset; Laurence Collette; Aldo Sainato; Luca Cionini; Rob Glynne-Jones; Nicholas Counsell; Esther Bastiaannet; Colette B M van den Broek; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; Hein Putter; Cornelis J H van de Velde Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Andrea Cercek; Karyn A Goodman; Carla Hajj; Emily Weisberger; Neil H Segal; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Zsofia K Stadler; Abraham J Wu; Martin R Weiser; Philip B Paty; Jose G Guillem; Garrett M Nash; Larissa K Temple; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Leonard B Saltz Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Koen C M J Peeters; Corrie A M Marijnen; Iris D Nagtegaal; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Hein Putter; Theo Wiggers; Harm Rutten; Lars Pahlman; Bengt Glimelius; Jan Willem Leer; Cornelis J H van de Velde Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 12.969