| Literature DB >> 33419147 |
Yuhei Miyasaka1,2, Shuichiro Komatsu1, Takanori Abe3, Nobuteru Kubo1,2, Naoko Okano1,2, Kei Shibuya1,2, Katsuyuki Shirai4, Hidemasa Kawamura1,2, Jun-Ichi Saitoh5, Takeshi Ebara6, Tatsuya Ohno1,2.
Abstract
Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Radiotherapy is an essential treatment modality for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard treatment for early-stage NSCLC because of its favorable local control (LC) compared to conventional radiotherapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a kind of external beam radiotherapy characterized by a steeper dose distribution and higher biological effectiveness. Several prospective studies have shown favorable outcomes. However, there is no direct comparison study between CIRT and SBRT to determine their benefits in the management of early-stage NSCLC. Thus, we conducted a retrospective, single-institutional, and contemporaneous comparison study, including propensity score-adjusted analyses, to clarify the differences in oncologic outcomes. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 80.1% in CIRT and 71.6% in SBRT (p = 0.0077). The 3-year LC was 87.7% in the CIRT group and 79.1% in the SBRT group (p = 0.037). Multivariable analyses showed favorable OS and LC in the CIRT group (hazard risk [HR] = 0.41, p = 0.047; HR = 0.30, p = 0.040, respectively). Log-rank tests after propensity score matching and Cox regression analyses using propensity score confirmed these results. These data provided a positive efficacy profile of CIRT for early-stage NSCLC.Entities:
Keywords: carbon ion radiotherapy; comparison; non-small cell lung cancer; outcomes; radiotherapy; stereotactic body radiotherapy
Year: 2021 PMID: 33419147 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639