Literature DB >> 33419147

Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Yuhei Miyasaka1,2, Shuichiro Komatsu1, Takanori Abe3, Nobuteru Kubo1,2, Naoko Okano1,2, Kei Shibuya1,2, Katsuyuki Shirai4, Hidemasa Kawamura1,2, Jun-Ichi Saitoh5, Takeshi Ebara6, Tatsuya Ohno1,2.   

Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Radiotherapy is an essential treatment modality for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard treatment for early-stage NSCLC because of its favorable local control (LC) compared to conventional radiotherapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a kind of external beam radiotherapy characterized by a steeper dose distribution and higher biological effectiveness. Several prospective studies have shown favorable outcomes. However, there is no direct comparison study between CIRT and SBRT to determine their benefits in the management of early-stage NSCLC. Thus, we conducted a retrospective, single-institutional, and contemporaneous comparison study, including propensity score-adjusted analyses, to clarify the differences in oncologic outcomes. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 80.1% in CIRT and 71.6% in SBRT (p = 0.0077). The 3-year LC was 87.7% in the CIRT group and 79.1% in the SBRT group (p = 0.037). Multivariable analyses showed favorable OS and LC in the CIRT group (hazard risk [HR] = 0.41, p = 0.047; HR = 0.30, p = 0.040, respectively). Log-rank tests after propensity score matching and Cox regression analyses using propensity score confirmed these results. These data provided a positive efficacy profile of CIRT for early-stage NSCLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon ion radiotherapy; comparison; non-small cell lung cancer; outcomes; radiotherapy; stereotactic body radiotherapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33419147     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Promising Treatment Strategy for Lung Cancer: A Combination of Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yuhei Miyasaka; Hiro Sato; Naoko Okano; Nobuteru Kubo; Hidemasa Kawamura; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  CircNEIL3 mediates pyroptosis to influence lung adenocarcinoma radiotherapy by upregulating PIF1 through miR-1184 inhibition.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Dong-Ming Wu; Peng-Wei Luo; Teng Liu; Rong Han; Shi-Hua Deng; Miao He; Yang-Yang Zhao; Ying Xu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 8.469

3.  Cost-effectiveness of carbon-ion radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shohei Okazaki; Kei Shibuya; Tomoyuki Takura; Yuhei Miyasaka; Hidemasa Kawamura; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 4.  Value of carbon-ion radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hanguang Ruan; Juan Xiong
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-14

5.  64Cu-ATSM Predicts Efficacy of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy Associated with Cellular Antioxidant Capacity.

Authors:  Ankita Nachankar; Takahiro Oike; Hirofumi Hanaoka; Ayaka Kanai; Hiro Sato; Yukari Yoshida; Hideru Obinata; Makoto Sakai; Naoto Osu; Yuka Hirota; Akihisa Takahashi; Atsushi Shibata; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy?

Authors:  Kyung Su Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.679

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.