Literature DB >> 33418430

Factors influencing multi-disciplinary tumor board recommendations in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Merle I Ronden1, Idris Bahce2, Sayed M S Hashemi2, Chris Dickhoff3, Patricia F de Haan4, Annemarie Becker2, Femke O B Spoelstra4, Max R Dahele4, Rania Ali4, Marian A Tiemessen5, Svitlana Tarasevych6, Karen Maassen van den Brink5, Cornelis J A Haasbeek4, Johannes M A Daniels2, Marjolein van Laren5, Wilko F A R Verbakel4, Suresh Senan4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Treatment patterns in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) vary considerably between countries, for reasons that are not well understood. We studied factors influencing treatment decision-making at thoracic multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDT's) and outcome for patients treated between 2015-2017, at a regional network comprising 5 hospitals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Details of all patients, including comorbidities, with stage III NSCLC were collected in an ethics-approved database. Weekly MDT's were conducted. The preferred radical intent treatments (RIT) for suitable patients were assumed to be concurrent chemoradiotherapy and/or surgery and other therapies were non-radical intent treatments (n-RIT).
RESULTS: Of 197 patients identified, 95 % were discussed at an MDT. RIT were recommended in 61 % of patients, but only 48 % finally received RIT. The estimated median OS was significantly better for patients undergoing RIT (28.3 months, CI-95 % 17.3-39.3), versus those who did not (11.2 months, CI-95 % 8.0-14.3). Patient age ≥70 years and a WHO-PS ≥2 were the most important predictors of not recommending RIT. Deaths due to progressive lung cancer within 2 years were observed in 36, 26 and 29 % of patients who received RIT, sequential chemoradiotherapy or radical radiotherapy. Corresponding comorbidity related deaths within 2 years were 3, 12 and 38 %.
CONCLUSION: A large number of patients who underwent MDT review were considered too old or not fit for RIT. More effective and better tolerated systemic treatments are required for patients presenting with stage III NSCLC.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multidisciplinary tumor board; Non-small cell lung cancer; Predictors patterns of care; Stage III; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33418430     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  2 in total

1.  The Impact of the Availability of Immunotherapy on Patterns of Care in Stage III NSCLC: A Dutch Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Merle I Ronden; Idris Bahce; Niels J M Claessens; Nicole Barlo; Max R Dahele; Johannes M A Daniels; Caroline Tissing-Tan; Edo Hekma; Sayed M S Hashemi; Antoinet van der Wel; Femke O B Spoelstra; Wilko F A R Verbakel; Marian A Tiemessen; Marjolein van Laren; Annemarie Becker; Svitlana Tarasevych; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Karen Maassen van den Brink; Chris Dickhoff; Suresh Senan
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2021-06-06

2.  Relationship between Treatment Plan Dosimetry, Toxicity, and Survival following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, with or without Chemotherapy, for Stage III Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Isabel F Remmerts de Vries; Merle I Ronden; Idris Bahce; Femke O B Spoelstra; Patricia F De Haan; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Ben J Slotman; Max Dahele; Wilko F A R Verbakel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.