| Literature DB >> 33418401 |
Mani Govindasamy1, Sea-Fue Wang2, Albandary Almahri3, U Rajaji4.
Abstract
Ultrasonic-enhanced surface-activeEntities:
Keywords: Antibiotic drug; Cyclic voltammetry; Electrocatalyst; Electrochemical detection; Sonochemical reactions
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33418401 PMCID: PMC7803933 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrason Sonochem ISSN: 1350-4177 Impact factor: 7.491
Scheme 1Schematic diagram of the electrochemical sensor and its applications.
Scheme 2Determination of chloramphenicol (CPL) in food samples using Bi2S3@GCN hybrid modified SPCE.
Fig. 1XRD analysis of Bi2S3@GCN (A) and XPS survey analysis of Bi2S3@GCN (B). High resolution and conventional analysis of Bi 4f (C), S 2p (D), C 1s (E), N1s (F).
Scheme 3Crystal structure analysis of Bi2S3 nanoparticle (A) ball-stick model and polyhedral model.
Fig. 2TEM analysis of Bi2S3@GCN hybrid (A-C), elemental analysis and quantitative analysis of Bi2S3@GCN (D), elemental mapping analysis of the hybrid material (E-H).
Fig. 3EIS (interface properties) analysis of SPCE (a), Bi2S3/SPCE (b), GCN/SPCE (c), Bi2S3@GCN hybrid/SPCE (d).
Fig. 4(A and B) Different pH analysis of CPL (100 µM) at Bi2S3@GCN hybrid modified SPCE (50 mV/s.
Fig. 5(A) CV analysis of unmodified SPCE (a), Bi2S3 NPs/SPCE (b), GCN/SPCE (c), Bi2S3@GCN hybrid (d). (B) Anti-fouling ability of Bi2S3@GCN/SPCE and its corresponding calibration plot (inset). (C) Different scan rate analysis (20 mV/s to 300 mVs) of Bi2S3@GCN/SPCE and corresponding calibration plot (D).
Fig. 6(A) DPV analysis of Bi2S3@GCN/SPCE and its corresponding calibration plot (B). Anti-interference ability of Bi2S3@GCN/SPCE (C) and stability analysis of the modified sensor (D).
Modified sensor parameters of Bi2S3@GCN modified electrode in presence of CPL with previously published modified electrodes.
| Electrodes | Linear range (µM) | LOD (µM) | Methods | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANi NWs | – | 0.0012 | DPV | |
| Fe3O4-CMC@Au | 2.5–25 | 0.07 | SWV | |
| Au NPs/GrO | 1.5–2.95 | 0.25 | DPV | |
| RGO | 1–113 | 0.15 | AM (i-t) | |
| MoS2/PANI | 0.1–100 | 0.065 | AM (i-t) | |
| Porous carbon | 1.0–4.0 | 0.0029 | LSV | |
| rGO-Pt-Pd NC | 0.2–30 | 0.1 | LSV | |
| TiN-RGO | 0.05–100 | 0.02 | DPV | |
| Bi2S3@GCN/SPCE | 0.02–374.4 | 0.0012 | DPV | This work |
CMC-magnetite nanostructures stabilized with carboxymethyl cellulose, GrO-graphene oxide, MWCNT-multi-walled carbon nanotube, RGO-reduced graphene oxide, PANI-polyaniline, DPV-differential pulse voltammetry, LSV-linear sweep voltammetry.
Fig. 7(A) Sensor stability analysis of Bi2S3@GCN/SPCE towards CPL and reproducibility analysis of the Bi2S3@GCN modified sensor (D).
Determination of CPL in food sample at Bi2S3@GCN/SPCE. Related standard deviation (RSD) of 3 independent experiments.
| Meat Samples | Added (nM) | Found (nM) | Recovery (%) | *RSD (%), n = 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| i-t | HPLC | i-t | HPLC | i-t | HPLC | ||
| Fresh milk | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| 100 | 99.26 | 99.28 | 99.26 | 99.28 | 0.23 | 0.12 | |
| 200 | 198.41 | 198.62 | 99.20 | 99.31 | 1.62 | 1.08 | |
| 500 | 498.6 | 499.01 | 99.72 | 99.80 | 1.12 | 0.19 | |
| Shrimp extract | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| 100 | 99.12 | 99.36 | 99.12 | 99.36 | 0.26 | 0.14 | |
| 200 | 198.35 | 198.4 | 99.18 | 99.20 | 1.96 | 1.42 | |
| 500 | 497.6 | 498.1 | 99.52 | 99.62 | 0.96 | 0.82 | |
| Honey | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| 100 | 99.12 | 99.02 | 99.12 | 99.02 | 0.15 | 0.17 | |
| 200 | 496.3 | 496.6 | 99.26 | 99.32 | 0.26 | 0.13 | |
| 500 | 497.8 | 498.3 | 99.56 | 99.66 | 0.96 | 0.75 | |