Literature DB >> 33417622

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Fresno Test for Turkish language.

Ozlem Serpil Cakmakkaya1, Ayse Hilal Bati2, Kerstin Kolodzie3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: National and international medical organizations and boards have recognized the importance of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) and emphasized that EBM training should be included in medical education programs. Although some Turkish medical schools have developed and implemented EBM training programs, no validated Turkish language assessment tool has been available to compare the effectiveness of these training programs to national or international standards. The aim of this study is to cross-culturally adapt the Fresno Test, which is a validated English language tool utilized worldwide in the assessment of EBM training.
METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional validation study, which was performed in two stages: Cross-cultural adaptation of the Fresno Test into Turkish; and evaluation of the psychometric properties, validity, reliability and responsiveness, of the Turkish version of the Fresno Test.
RESULTS: The content validity of the test was evaluated by experienced physicians in the field of Evidence-Based Medicine, and the content validity index was 1.00. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.78 on the post-test results. The intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient and the kappa analysis were calculated to evaluate inter-rater reliability. The ICC coefficients ranged from 0.66 to 0.97 for pre- and post-test results. The Kappa coefficients were 1.00 for all pre-test and post-test questions except one post-test question which was 0.89. The change score of the Fresno Test was used to evaluate responsiveness. The students' score of the Turkish Fresno Test was 49.9 ±18.2 pre-training and 118.9 ±26.3 post-training with a change of 69 points (95% CI, 63.9-74.2). The Cohen's effect size was 3.04 (95% CI, 2.6-3.5) indicating a very large change in scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish adapted Fresno Test used to evaluate students' success and program effectiveness is a valid and reliable measurement tool. It will be of great benefit for the comparison of the effectiveness of Turkish education programs nationally and cross-culturally.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33417622      PMCID: PMC7793267          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  20 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Do short courses in evidence based medicine improve knowledge and skills? Validation of Berlin questionnaire and before and after study of courses in evidence based medicine.

Authors:  L Fritsche; T Greenhalgh; Y Falck-Ytter; H-H Neumayer; R Kunz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-07

3.  Validation of the Fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine.

Authors:  Kathleen D Ramos; Sean Schafer; Susan M Tracz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-08

4.  Principles of evidence based medicine.

Authors:  A K Akobeng
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 6.  Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Terrence Shaneyfelt; Karyn D Baum; Douglas Bell; David Feldstein; Thomas K Houston; Scott Kaatz; Chad Whelan; Michael Green
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools.

Authors:  Julie K Tilson; Sandra L Kaplan; Janet L Harris; Andy Hutchinson; Dragan Ilic; Richard Niederman; Jarmila Potomkova; Sandra E Zwolsman
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research.

Authors:  Berrie Middel; Eric van Sonderen
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 5.120

9.  Cross-cultural adaptation and reproducibility of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the modified FRESNO Test to evaluate the competence in evidence based practice by physical therapists.

Authors:  Anderson M Silva; Lucíola C M Costa; Maria L Comper; Rosimeire S Padula
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  How to choose an evidence-based medicine knowledge test for medical students? Comparison of three knowledge measures.

Authors:  Ivan Buljan; Ana Jerončić; Mario Malički; Matko Marušić; Ana Marušić
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.