Literature DB >> 33417598

The complexity of protein interactions unravelled from structural disorder.

Beatriz Seoane1,2,3, Alessandra Carbone1.   

Abstract

The importance of unstructured biology has quickly grown during the last decades accompanying the explosion of the number of experimentally resolved protein structures. The idea that structural disorder might be a novel mechanism of protein interaction is widespread in the literature, although the number of statistically significant structural studies supporting this idea is surprisingly low. At variance with previous works, our conclusions rely exclusively on a large-scale analysis of all the 134337 X-ray crystallographic structures of the Protein Data Bank averaged over clusters of almost identical protein sequences. In this work, we explore the complexity of the organisation of all the interaction interfaces observed when a protein lies in alternative complexes, showing that interfaces progressively add up in a hierarchical way, which is reflected in a logarithmic law for the size of the union of the interface regions on the number of distinct interfaces. We further investigate the connection of this complexity with different measures of structural disorder: the standard missing residues and a new definition, called "soft disorder", that covers all the flexible and structurally amorphous residues of a protein. We show evidences that both the interaction interfaces and the soft disordered regions tend to involve roughly the same amino-acids of the protein, and preliminary results suggesting that soft disorder spots those surface regions where new interfaces are progressively accommodated by complex formation. In fact, our results suggest that structurally disordered regions not only carry crucial information about the location of alternative interfaces within complexes, but also about the order of the assembly. We verify these hypotheses in several examples, such as the DNA binding domains of P53 and P73, the C3 exoenzyme, and two known biological orders of assembly. We finally compare our measures of structural disorder with several disorder bioinformatics predictors, showing that these latter are optimised to predict the residues that are missing in all the alternative structures of a protein and they are not able to catch the progressive evolution of the disordered regions upon complex formation. Yet, the predicted residues, when not missing, tend to be characterised as soft disordered regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33417598      PMCID: PMC7846008          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  44 in total

1.  Orderly order in protein intrinsic disorder distribution: disorder in 3500 proteomes from viruses and the three domains of life.

Authors:  Bin Xue; A Keith Dunker; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting.

Authors:  Peter Tompa; Csilla Szász; László Buday
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Exceptionally abundant exceptions: comprehensive characterization of intrinsic disorder in all domains of life.

Authors:  Zhenling Peng; Jing Yan; Xiao Fan; Marcin J Mizianty; Bin Xue; Kui Wang; Gang Hu; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets.

Authors:  Martin Steinegger; Johannes Söding
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions.

Authors:  H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics.

Authors:  Peter J A Cock; Tiago Antao; Jeffrey T Chang; Brad A Chapman; Cymon J Cox; Andrew Dalke; Iddo Friedberg; Thomas Hamelryck; Frank Kauff; Bartek Wilczynski; Michiel J L de Hoon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics.

Authors:  Rune Linding; Lars Juhl Jensen; Francesca Diella; Peer Bork; Toby J Gibson; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  IUPred2A: context-dependent prediction of protein disorder as a function of redox state and protein binding.

Authors:  Bálint Mészáros; Gábor Erdos; Zsuzsanna Dosztányi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Prediction of protein binding regions in disordered proteins.

Authors:  Bálint Mészáros; István Simon; Zsuzsanna Dosztányi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  SPOT-Disorder2: Improved Protein Intrinsic Disorder Prediction by Ensembled Deep Learning.

Authors:  Jack Hanson; Kuldip K Paliwal; Thomas Litfin; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 7.691

View more
  2 in total

1.  Three-dimensional Structure Databases of Biological Macromolecules.

Authors:  Vaishali P Waman; Christine Orengo; Gerard J Kleywegt; Arthur M Lesk
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  The structural basis of Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase dependent targeting and phosphorylation of the MCM2-7 double hexamer.

Authors:  Almutasem Saleh; Yasunori Noguchi; Ricardo Aramayo; Marina E Ivanova; Kathryn M Stevens; Alex Montoya; S Sunidhi; Nicolas Lopez Carranza; Marcin J Skwark; Christian Speck
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 17.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.