Literature DB >> 33417186

Upper GI training of young surgeons: a reality full of hurdles. An international survey.

Rossella Reddavid1, William Allum2, Karol Polom3, Aridai Resendiz1, Woo Jin Hyung4, Paolo Kassab5, Daniela Molena6, Enrique Lanzarini7, Masanori Terashima8, Alberto Biondi9, Richard Van Hilegersberg10, Domenico D'Ugo9, Uberto Fumagalli11, Stefano Santi12, Giovanni De Manzoni13, Franco Roviello14, Maurizio Degiuli15.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anecdotal evidence suggests that the training of young surgeons in Upper GI is not homogeneous across the world. This survey aimed to investigate the different training programs and the level of satisfaction of young surgeons with their surgical and scientific education pathway.
DESIGN: A multiple-choice and single best answer format questionnaire was sent to 36 Upper GI chairs from international referral centres and then forwarded to young surgeons (attending physician less than 40 years old). The same questionnaire containing 5 main topics (demographics, residency, fellowship, academic research and activities, manual skill improvement) was posted online on a Surveymonkey website.
SETTING: San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy; Tertiary University Hospital.
RESULTS: Fourteen replies were received from colleagues in 36 referral centres (39% response rate) and 65 voluntary answers from the survey monkey platform. During residency training, only 43% of residents had a specific training in upper GI tract surgery, which was characterized by a small number of interventions performed both with trainer scrubbed and unscrubbed. Fellowship programmes were undertaken by 49% of participants and 64% spent this training period abroad. Operative experience was reported by nearly all respondents with only 27% performing > 10 gastrectomies and only 11% performing > 10 oesophagectomies with the trainer scrubbed. The majority attended less than 10 meetings (58%), and 70% of them published less than 5 papers.
CONCLUSIONS: The present survey reveals that the young surgeons of the twenty-first century face many hurdles during their surgical training. Overall, the surgical education settings are limited for both practical and scientific training for upper GI trainees. As a result, it is not possible to train in upper GI surgery to a level of competent independent practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fellowship; Residency; Scientific training; Surgical education; Upper GI training

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33417186      PMCID: PMC8950080          DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00955-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  18 in total

1.  Abstracts of the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons for Great Britain and Ireland. September 15-16, 2011. Belfast, United Kingdom.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Changes in surgical training opportunities in Britain and South Africa.

Authors:  Martin Greensmith; Jun Cho; Rachel Hargest
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  Cancer care in the developed world: A comparison of surgical oncology training programs.

Authors:  Motaz Qadan; Andrew R Davies; Hiram C Polk; William H Allum; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The General Surgery Residency Program in Italy: a changing scenario.

Authors:  Marco Montorsi; Nicolò De Manzini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-07-06

5.  A snapshot of surgical resident training in Japan: results of a national-level needs assessment survey.

Authors:  Saseem Poudel; Satoshi Hirano; Yo Kurashima; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Susumu Eguchi; Toshihiro Fukui; Masaru Hagiwara; Daisuke Hashimoto; Koya Hida; Tomoko Izaki; Hirotaka Iwase; Shunsuke Kawamoto; Yasuhiro Otomo; Eishi Nagai; Mitsue Saito; Hideki Takami; Yuko Takeda; Masakazu Toi; Hiroki Yamaue; Motofumi Yoshida; Shigetoshi Yoshida; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Centralization of highly complex low-volume procedures in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Johanna A M G Tol; Thomas M van Gulik; Olivier R C Busch; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  Research during general surgery residency: a Web-based review of opportunities, structure and outputs.

Authors:  Audrey Brochu; Rajesh Aggarwal
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Surgical training and research in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  Keio J Med       Date:  2019

10.  Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Marianne H B C Stenstra; Gijs H K Berkelmans; Annelijn E Slaman; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Frits J H van den Wildenberg; Fatih Polat; Tomoyuki Irino; Magnus Nilsson; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Misha D Luyer; Eddy M Adang; Gerjon Hannink; Maroeska M Rovers; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Minimally invasive vs. open segmental resection of the splenic flexure for cancer: a nationwide study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CNN).

Authors:  Maurizio Degiuli; Monica Ortenzi; Mariano Tomatis; Lucia Puca; Desiree Cianflocca; Daniela Rega; Annalisa Maroli; Ugo Elmore; Francesca Pecchini; Marco Milone; Roberta La Mendola; Erica Soligo; Simona Deidda; Domenico Spoletini; Diletta Cassini; Alessandra Aprile; Michela Mineccia; Herald Nikaj; Francesco Marchegiani; Fabio Maiello; Cristina Bombardini; Michele Zuolo; Michele Carlucci; Luca Ferraro; Armando Falato; Alberto Biondi; Roberto Persiani; Patrizia Marsanich; Daniele Fusario; Leonardo Solaini; Sara Pollesel; Gianluca Rizzo; Claudio Coco; Alberto Di Leo; Davide Cavaliere; Franco Roviello; Andrea Muratore; Domenico D'Ugo; Francesco Bianco; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Paola De Nardi; Marco Rigamonti; Gabriele Anania; Claudio Belluco; Roberto Polastri; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Sergio Gentilli; Alessandro Ferrero; Stefano Scabini; Gianandrea Baldazzi; Massimo Carlini; Angelo Restivo; Silvio Testa; Dario Parini; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Micaela Piccoli; Riccardo Rosati; Antonino Spinelli; Paolo Delrio; Felice Borghi; Marco Guerrieri; Rossella Reddavid
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.453

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.