Literature DB >> 33417171

Real-life experience with fidaxomicin in Clostridioides difficile infection: a multicentre cohort study on 244 episodes.

Rosa Escudero-Sánchez1,2, Angela Valencia-Alijo3, Sandra Cuéllar Tovar4, Esperanza Merino-de Lucas5, Sergio García Fernández6,7, Ángela Gutiérrez-Rojas3, Antonio Ramos-Martínez3, Miguel Salavert Lletí4, Iván Castro Hernández4, Livia Giner5, Javier Cobo8,6.   

Abstract

The high cost of fidaxomicin has restricted its use despite the benefit of a lower Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) recurrence rate at 4 weeks of follow-up. This short follow-up represents the main limitation of pivotal clinical trials of fidaxomicin, and some recent studies question its benefits over vancomycin. Moreover, the main risk factors of recurrence after treatment with fidaxomicin remain unknown. We designed a multicentre retrospective cohort study among four Spanish hospitals to assess the efficacy of fidaxomicin in real life and to investigate risk factors of fidaxomicin failure at weeks 8 and 12. Two-hundred forty-four patients were included. Fidaxomicin was used in 96 patients (39.3%) for a first episode of CDI, in 95 patients (38.9%) for a second episode, and in 53 patients (21.7%) for a third or subsequent episode. Patients treated with fidaxomicin in a first episode were younger (59.9 years vs 73.5 years), but they had more severe episodes (52.1% vs. 32.4%). The recurrence rates for patients treated in the first episode were 6.5% and 9.7% at weeks 8 and 12, respectively. Recurrence rates increased for patients treated at second or ulterior episodes (16.3% and 26.4% at week 8, respectively). Age greater than or equal to 85 years and having had a previous episode of CDI were identified as recurrence risk factors at weeks 8 and 12. We conclude that the outcomes with fidaxomicin in real life are at least as good as those observed in clinical trials despite a more demanding evaluation. Be it 85 years of age or older, and the use after a first episode appears to be independent factors of CDI recurrence after treatment with fidaxomicin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridioides difficile; Clostridioides difficile infection; Fidaxomicin; Real life

Year:  2021        PMID: 33417171     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-020-01567-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  6 in total

1.  European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  S B Debast; M P Bauer; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients 60 years and older (EXTEND): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b/4 trial.

Authors:  Benoit Guery; Francesco Menichetti; Veli-Jukka Anttila; Nicholas Adomakoh; Jose Maria Aguado; Karen Bisnauthsing; Areti Georgopali; Simon D Goldenberg; Andreas Karas; Gbenga Kazeem; Chris Longshaw; Jose Alejandro Palacios-Fabrega; Oliver A Cornely; Maria J G T Vehreschild
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin for severe Clostridium difficile infection: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  C A Gentry; P K Nguyen; S Thind; G Kurdgelashvili; G H Skrepnek; R J Williams
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Prediction of recurrent clostridium difficile infection at the bedside: the GEIH-CDI score.

Authors:  Javier Cobo; Esperanza Merino; Cristina Martínez; Alberto Cózar-Llistó; Evelyn Shaw; Teresa Marrodán; Esther Calbo; Elena Bereciartúa; Luis A Sánchez-Muñoz; Miguel Salavert; M Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez; Dácil García-Rosado; J María Bravo-Ferrer; Juan Gálvez-Acebal; César Henríquez-Camacho; Jordi Cuquet; Berta Pino-Calm; Luis Torres; Antonio Sánchez-Porto; Borja M Fernández-Félix
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for infection with Clostridium difficile in Europe, Canada, and the USA: a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Oliver A Cornely; Derrick W Crook; Roberto Esposito; André Poirier; Michael S Somero; Karl Weiss; Pamela Sears; Sherwood Gorbach
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Real-world use of fidaxomicin in a large UK tertiary hospital: how effective is it for treating recurrent disease?

Authors:  D A Enoch; R Santos; C J Phillips; C Micallef; M E Murphy; S H Aliyu; D Massey; N M Brown
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.926

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Risk of Clostridioides difficile Recurrence after Initial Treatment with Vancomycin or Fidaxomicin Utilizing Cerner Health Facts.

Authors:  Ronald G Hall; Travis J Cole; Chip Shaw; Carlos A Alvarez
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.