David García-Mato1,2, Mónica García-Sevilla1,2, Antonio R Porras3, Santiago Ochandiano2,4, Juan V Darriba-Allés2,5, Roberto García-Leal2,5, José I Salmerón2,4, Marius George Linguraru3,6, Javier Pascau7,8. 1. Departamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avenida de la Universidad 30, 28911, Leganés, Madrid, Spain. 2. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 3. Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA. 4. Servicio de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 5. Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 6. School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. 7. Departamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avenida de la Universidad 30, 28911, Leganés, Madrid, Spain. jpascau@ing.uc3m.es. 8. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. jpascau@ing.uc3m.es.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Surgical correction of metopic craniosynostosis typically involves open cranial vault remodeling. Accurate translation of the virtual surgical plan into the operating room is challenging due to the lack of tools for intraoperative analysis of the surgical outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a hand-held 3D photography device for intraoperative evaluation and guidance during cranial vault surgical reconstruction. METHODS: A hand-held structured light scanner was used for intraoperative 3D photography during five craniosynostosis surgeries, obtaining 3D models of skin and bone surfaces before and after the remodeling. The accuracy of this device for 3D modeling and morphology quantification was evaluated using preoperative computed tomography imaging as gold-standard. In addition, the time required for intraoperative 3D photograph acquisition was measured. RESULTS: The average error of intraoperative 3D photography was 0.30 mm. Moreover, the interfrontal angle and the transverse forehead width were accurately measured in the 3D photographs with an average error of 0.72 degrees and 0.62 mm. Surgeon's feedback indicates that this technology can be integrated into the surgical workflow without substantially increasing surgical time. CONCLUSION: Hand-held 3D photography is an accurate technique for objective quantification of intraoperative cranial vault morphology and guidance during metopic craniosynostosis surgical reconstruction. This noninvasive technique does not substantially increase surgical time and does not require exposure to ionizing radiation, presenting a valuable alternative to computed tomography imaging. The proposed methodology can be integrated into the surgical workflow to assist during cranial vault remodeling and ensure optimal surgical outcomes.
PURPOSE: Surgical correction of metopic craniosynostosis typically involves open cranial vault remodeling. Accurate translation of the virtual surgical plan into the operating room is challenging due to the lack of tools for intraoperative analysis of the surgical outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a hand-held 3D photography device for intraoperative evaluation and guidance during cranial vault surgical reconstruction. METHODS: A hand-held structured light scanner was used for intraoperative 3D photography during five craniosynostosis surgeries, obtaining 3D models of skin and bone surfaces before and after the remodeling. The accuracy of this device for 3D modeling and morphology quantification was evaluated using preoperative computed tomography imaging as gold-standard. In addition, the time required for intraoperative 3D photograph acquisition was measured. RESULTS: The average error of intraoperative 3D photography was 0.30 mm. Moreover, the interfrontal angle and the transverse forehead width were accurately measured in the 3D photographs with an average error of 0.72 degrees and 0.62 mm. Surgeon's feedback indicates that this technology can be integrated into the surgical workflow without substantially increasing surgical time. CONCLUSION: Hand-held 3D photography is an accurate technique for objective quantification of intraoperative cranial vault morphology and guidance during metopic craniosynostosis surgical reconstruction. This noninvasive technique does not substantially increase surgical time and does not require exposure to ionizing radiation, presenting a valuable alternative to computed tomography imaging. The proposed methodology can be integrated into the surgical workflow to assist during cranial vault remodeling and ensure optimal surgical outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D photography; Craniosynostosis; Outcome; Shape analysis; Surgery
Authors: Antonio R Porras; Liyun Tu; Deki Tsering; Esperanza Mantilla; Albert Oh; Andinet Enquobahrie; Robert Keating; Gary F Rogers; Marius George Linguraru Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Carlos S Mendoza; Nabile Safdar; Kazunori Okada; Emmarie Myers; Gary F Rogers; Marius George Linguraru Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: J W Meulstee; L M Verhamme; W A Borstlap; F Van der Heijden; G A De Jong; T Xi; S J Bergé; H Delye; T J J Maal Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Jacques van der Meulen; Rene van der Hulst; Leon van Adrichem; Eric Arnaud; David Chin-Shong; Christian Duncan; Edith Habets; Jose Hinojosa; Irene Mathijssen; Paul May; Daniel Morritt; Hiroshi Nishikawa; Peter Noons; David Richardson; Steve Wall; Joris van der Vlugt; Dominique Renier Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Verónica García-Vázquez; Begoña Sesé-Lucio; Felipe A Calvo; Juan J Vaquero; Manuel Desco; Javier Pascau Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: David García-Mato; Santiago Ochandiano; Mónica García-Sevilla; Carlos Navarro-Cuéllar; Juan V Darriba-Allés; Roberto García-Leal; José A Calvo-Haro; Rubén Pérez-Mañanes; José I Salmerón; Javier Pascau Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: David García-Mato; Antonio R Porras; Santiago Ochandiano; Gary F Rogers; Roberto García-Leal; José I Salmerón; Javier Pascau; Marius George Linguraru Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-11-11