Literature DB >> 33416292

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Laparotomy for Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mario M Leitao1, Qin C Zhou, Maria B Schiavone, Renee A Cowan, Evan S Smith, Alexia Iasonos, Mitchell Veith, Michael Rafizadeh, Katherine Curran, Bhavani Ramesh, Kaity Chang, Dennis S Chi, Yukio Sonoda, Amy K Brown, Jonathan A Cosin, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Martin A Martino, Jennifer J Mueller, Kara Long Roche, Elizabeth L Jewell, Vance Broach, Nicholas C Lambrou, John P Diaz, Oliver Zivanovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic surgery.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial. Eligible, consenting patients, regardless of body mass index (BMI), who were undergoing laparotomy for presumed gynecologic malignancy were randomly allocated to standard gauze or negative pressure wound therapy. Patients with BMIs of 40 or greater and benign disease also were eligible. Randomization, stratified by BMI, occurred after skin closure. The primary outcome was wound complication within 30 (±5) days of surgery. A sample size of 343 per group (N=686) was planned.
RESULTS: From March 1, 2016, to August 20, 2019, we identified 663 potential patients; 289 were randomized to negative pressure wound therapy (254 evaluable participants) and 294 to standard gauze (251 evaluable participants), for a total of 505 evaluable patients. The median age of the entire cohort was 61 years (range 20-87). Four hundred ninety-five patients (98%) underwent laparotomy for malignancy. The trial was eventually stopped for futility after an interim analysis of 444 patients. The rate of wound complications was 17.3% in the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) group and 16.3% in the gauze group, absolute risk difference 1% (90% CI -4.5 to 6.5%; P=.77). Adjusted odds ratio controlling for estimated blood loss and diabetes was 0.99 (90% CI 0.62-1.60). Skin blistering occurred in 33 patients (13%) in the NPWT group and in three patients (1.2%) in the gauze group (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Negative pressure wound therapy after laparotomy for gynecologic surgery did not lower the wound complication rate but did increase skin blistering. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02682316. FUNDING SOURCE: The protocol was supported in part by KCI/Acelity.
Copyright © 2021 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33416292      PMCID: PMC7856105          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

1.  Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound management Following Midline Laparotomy in Gynecological Oncology Operations: A Feasibility Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lucia Yin; Katherine Lau; Gautam Mehra; Ahmad Sayasneh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-24

2.  Assessment of wound perfusion with near-infrared angiography: A prospective feasibility study.

Authors:  Beryl L Manning-Geist; Renee A Cowan; Brooke Schlappe; Kenya Braxton; Yukio Sonoda; Kara Long Roche; Mario M Leitao; Dennis S Chi; Oliver Zivanovic; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Jennifer J Mueller
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-02-03

3.  Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound care in cancer surgical wounds: A meta-analysis of observational studies and randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Indri Lakhsmi Putri; Lavonia Berlina Adzalika; Rachmaniar Pramanasari; Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.099

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.