Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on ambient air quality in megacities of India and implication for air pollution control strategies.

The impact of restrictions during various phases of COVID-19 lockdown on daily mean PM2.5 concentration in five Indian megacities (New Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Hyderabad) was studied. The impact was studied for pre-lockdown (1st Mar-24th Mar 2020), lockdown (25th Mar-31st May 2020), and unlocking (1st Jun-31st Aug 2020) phases. The lockdown period comprises 4 lockdown phases with distinct measures, whereas the unlocking period had 3 phases. PM2.5 concentration reduced significantly in all megacities and met the national standards during the lockdown period. The maximum reduction in PM2.5 level was observed in Kolkata (62%), followed by Mumbai (49%), Chennai (34%), and New Delhi (26%) during the lockdown period. Comparatively, Hyderabad exhibited a smaller reduction in PM2.5 concentration, i.e., 10%. The average PM2.5 levels during the lockdown in the peak hour (i.e., 07:00-11:00 h) in New Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Hyderabad decreased by 21.3%, 48.5%, 63.4%, 56.4%, and 23.8%, respectively, compared to those before lockdown period. During the unlocking period, except for Chennai, all megacities showed a reduction in average PM2.5 levels compared to concentrations in the lockdown period, but these reductions were mainly linked with monsoon rains in India. The current study provided an opportunity to study air pollution in the absence of major anthropogenic activities and during limited activities in monsoon season having an ecological design. The study reports a new baseline of PM2.5, except for monsoon, and explores this knowledge to plan future air pollution reduction strategies. The study also discusses how this new learning of knowledge could strengthen air pollution control policies for better air quality and sustainability.Graphical abstract.

Introduction

As a preventive step to contain the COVID-19 disease, an unprecedented lockdown was imposed on the 25th of March 2020 in India, and then it was extended phase-wise until the 31st of May 2020. All non-essential sectors were closed, such as schools, colleges, and industries, including transportation in the entire country, making it the most extended lockdown in the world. This lockdown has also brought some unforeseen environmental benefits, including improvement in air quality since the start of the lockdown (Arora et al. 2020; Singh et al. 2020a).

In the past, several short- and long-term measures to improve air quality were taken globally. Some of these steps include the 2016 odd-even policy in New Delhi, India, to reduce vehicular air pollution (Chowdhury et al. 2017), and regulation and closure of traffic including industries (temporary and permanent) during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games (Chen et al. 2013). It was observed that during the Beijing Olympics, the air quality in the city improved by 24.9% (Chen et al. 2013). The odd-even policy in New Delhi shows a marginal change in air quality improvement (Sharma et al. 2017; Chowdhury et al. 2017). Levy et al. (2006) also observed a small but measurable influence on air quality during the Democratic National Convention in Boston in 2004 due to road closures. Ravindra et al. (2006) highlighted the changes in air quality associated with policy implications such as adopting clean fuel in public transport or other measures (Ravindra et al. 2020; Sembhi et al. 2020). These studies highlight that such events help to understand air pollution and sources better. Similarly, Li et al. (2019) also examine the impact of air pollution control measures on various ambient pollutants during the G-20 summit in Hangzhou in 2016. These observations were in agreement with the APEC summit 2014 in China, where short-term improvement in air quality was observed by Huang et al. (2015). In Chile, the regulatory plans like PDAs (Environmental Decontamination Plans) on PM2.5 show up to an 8 μg m−3 reduction in PM10 levels (Mardones and Cornejo 2020).

Short-term closure of vehicular traffic (36 h) in the South Coast Air Basin, USA, the regional PM2.5 reduced 18–36% (Quiros et al. 2013). Similar results were reported in Yeongdong, South Korea, during a temporary shutdown of coal-fired power plants resulting in around 4.4 μg m−3 reduction in PM2.5 (Yi and Sung 2018). In agreement with Gurjar et al. (2016), Ravindra et al. (2016), and Bhargava et al. (2018), Vardoulakis et al. (2018) also highlighted that multiple measures to regulate traffic-related pollution not only help in air quality improvement but also has various public health benefits. However, most of the above interventions were short-term and having limited restrictions, e.g., closure of a road or some industries.

The current study examines the impact of long-term lockdown on PM2.5 levels in India’s five megacities and changes in PM2.5 levels in the unlocking period. The unfortunate spread of coronavirus and subsequent lockdown to prevent the spread of the virus in the community led to the closure of most anthropogenic activities. This provides an opportunity as an ecological study to ascertain the baseline air pollution levels and extend the learning to formulate evidence-based short- and long-term policies to minimize the air pollution and associated premature death and diseases.

Data and methodology

The current study examines the air pollution data (PM2.5) being collected by the US Embassy and consulates in India from the year 2016–2020. To study the impact of lockdown on daily mean PM2.5 concentrations, the period from the 1st to the 24th of March 2020 was considered pre-lockdown, from the 25th of March to the 31st of May 2020 as a lockdown period, and from the 1st of June to the 31st of August 2020 as unlocking (partial-relaxation) period. The average matching period (2016–2019) was taken as business as usual (BAU) for comparison to study the air quality changes during the lockdown period. The US Embassy and consulates provide high-resolution air quality data over many cities worldwide, including India. The PM2.5 levels are being measured using BAM-1020 (Beta Attenuation Monitor; MetOne, USA).

In India, BAM is positioned in the US Embassy, New Delhi, including other consulates in Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, and Mumbai (Singh et al. 2020b). Out of these five megacities, Delhi is India’s national capital, and the rest of the cities are the administrative capital of respective states. These megacities represent major geographical locations of India, and this provides an opportunity to conduct valid scientific analysis considering the diverse Indian climate. All monitoring sites provide hourly PM2.5 data since March 2015. The hourly PM2.5 data was downloaded from the 1st of March 2020 to the 31st of August 2020 from all five locations were examined for inconsistency and validated before analysis. Meteorological data of rainfall, relative humidity (RH), and average temperature (AT) were downloaded from www.ogimet.com.

Results and discussion

Effect of lockdown on daily mean PM2.5 levels

The impact of lockdown on daily mean PM2.5 concentrations was studied before lockdown (1st March–24th March), during different phases of lockdown (25th March–31st May), and during unlocking stages (1st June–31 August) in five megacities of India. The daily average concentration of PM2.5 in Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, and New Delhi before the lockdown period was 21.8 ± 10.0 μg m−3, 34.3 ± 10.9 μg m−3, 65.1 ± 30.1 μg m−3, 48.6 ± 20.6 μg m−3, and 60.0 ± 18.4 μg m−3, which reduced to 14.4 ± 8.7 μg m−3, 30.9 ± 8.1 μg m−3, 24.7 ± 13.7 μg m−3, 24.6 ± 9.7 μg m−3, and 44.2 ± 16.3 μg m−3 as depicted in Table 1.

Table 1

Daily average concentration of PM2.5 (in μg m−3) before lockdown (1st Mar–24th Mar), during different phases of lockdown (25th Mar–31st May), and during different phases of unlocking down (1st Jun–31st Aug) period in five Indian megacities

Locations	Mean PM2.5 concentration (μg m−3)
	Before lockdown	Lockdown 1	Lockdown 2	Lockdown 3	Lockdown 4	Overall lockdown	Unlocking 1	Unlocking 2	Unlocking 3	Overall unlocking
Chennai	21.8 ± 10.0	19.4 ± 7.4	8.6 ± 6.7	8.6 ± 3.4	20.8 ± 7.7	14.4 ± 8.7	17.4 ± 4.8	14.5 ± 4.8	20.5 ± 6.2	17.5 ± 5.8
Hyderabad	34.3 ± 10.9	35.3 ± 8.3	27.6 ± 6.6	26.5 ± 4.1	33.3 ± 9.0	30.9 ± 8.1	13.6 ± 5.0	11.0 ± 4.9	10.7 ± 4.6	11.8 ± 5.0
Kolkata	65.1 ± 30.1	41.1 ± 11.3	19.0 ± 6.9	18.5 ± 6.6	14.3 ± 4.7	24.7 ± 13.7	14.1 ± 5.6	12.9 ± 8.0	11.9 ± 12.4	13.2 ± 8.1
Mumbai	48.6 ± 20.6	36.7 ± 2.9	23.3 ± 4.9	20.0 ± 7.5	14.7 ± 4.4	24.6 ± 9.7	16.0 ± 4.9	10.5 ± 3.3	7.0 ± 4.0	12.5 ± 6.1
New Delhi	60.0 ± 18.4	37.7 ± 10.5	40.8 ± 12.4	50.7 ± 16.5	52.1 ± 22.7	44.2 ± 16.3	42.2 ± 10.6	30.3 ± 12.0	21.2 ± 8.2	31.1 ± 13.3

This indicates that PM2.5 levels decrease significantly, and all the locations met the Indian air quality standard (60 μg m−3 for 24 h average). The maximum reduction in PM2.5 concentrations was observed in Kolkata (62%), followed by Mumbai (49%), Chennai (34%), and New Delhi (26%). Comparatively, Hyderabad exhibited a slight reduction in PM2.5 concentration, i.e., 10%. Graphical representation of daily average data (Fig. 1) of five megacities shows a gradual declining trend after the lockdown period. It is important to note that during the lockdown period, all major anthropogenic and industrial activities such as vehicles, mini industries, restaurants, and street vendors were closed, providing an opportunity to conduct a baseline monitoring of PM2.5 levels in all megacities. The various lockdown phases have a difference in restrictions resulting in variation in PM2.5 levels in different stages of lockdown. In the first phase of lockdown, all human activities were halted except for emergency services (Singh et al. 2020a; Mor et al. 2020). After that, in consecutive phases, increased activities, like movements of people stuck in lockdown, relaxation in timings to buy market goods, and the opening of essential industries, were allowed with limitations.

Fig. 1

Daily average concentration of PM2.5 (in μg m−3) in five Indian megacities before (1st March–24th March), during lockdown (25th March–31st May) and unlocking (1st June–31st August) period along with its comparison with business as usual (BAU) concentrations from the year 2016–2019

Sharma and Dikshit (2016) reported that significant contributors to annual PM2.5 emissions in Delhi include road dust (38%), vehicle exhaust emissions (20%), domestic fuel burning (12%), and industries (11%). Furthermore, crop residue burning also affects during specific seasons (Singh et al. 2020c, 2020d). The other studies from Delhi megacity reported vehicular emissions (exhaust and non-exhaust) have a significant contribution to Delhi’s PM2.5 load varies up to 60% (Sahu et al. 2011; Singh et al. 2020e; Gargava and Rajagopalan 2016). In lockdowns 1 and 2, it was observed that there is only restricted vehicular movement, and only essential services like police, hospital, army, and other emergency transport vehicles were allowed. This restricted vehicle movement resulted in a significant reduction in the exhaust and non-exhaust emissions, which is one of the significant contributors to the total PM emissions.

Similarly, in other megacities like Mumbai, roadside dust, vehicles, and construction have a significant contribution to PM emissions, which varies from 29 to 47%, 8–26%, and 8–26%, respectively (CPCB 2011). In Chennai, roadside dust and vehicles have significant contributions varying from 6 to 27% and 35 to 48%, respectively (Gargava and Rajagopalan 2016). The absence of all these significant contributors to PM concentration led to a decrease in PM levels. Contrary to these factors, household emissions might have increased during the lockdown period. In Hyderabad, vehicular exhaust (31%) and resuspension of dust (26%) are also major contributors to ambient PM2.5 levels, followed by combustion (9%), industries (7%), and waste burning (6%) (Gummeneni et al. 2011). Furthermore, in India, during summer seasons, planetary boundary layer height increases, and wind speeds help in reducing the PM2.5 levels (Sreekanth et al. 2018).

Diurnal variation in PM2.5 concentrations

Figure 2 shows the diurnal variations in PM2.5 average hourly concentration before lockdown, during the lockdown and unlocking period in all five megacities. Supplementary Table 1 provides a more detailed analysis as dicussed. The highest PM2.5 concentrations (90.3 μg m−3) were observed during morning rush hours (09:00 h) in New Delhi, which later gradually decreases to 64 μg m−3 in lockdown and 31.2 μg m−3 in the unlocking period. Similarly, in Chennai, PM2.5 concentration peaks at 08:00 h (39.4 μg m−3) and levels reduced later from 17.2 μg m−3 and 18.0 μg m−3 in lockdown and unlocking period. Other megacities, i.e., Kolkata, Mumbai, and Hyderabad, also depict the highest levels of PM2.5 during morning hours at 00:00 h, 09:00 h, and 09:00 h having peak PM2.5 concertation of 84.7, 71.0, and 43.6 μg m−3. During the lockdown, the PM2.5 peaks in these cities shifted to 14:00 h, 22:00 h, and 22:00 h, having PM2.5 peak concentrations of 29.3, 27.8, and 37.9 μg m−3.

Fig. 2

Diurnal variations in the average hourly concentration of PM2.5 (in μg m−3) before (1st March–24th March) (a), during lockdown (25th March–31st May) (b), and unlocking period (1st June–31st August) (c) along with its comparison with business as usual (BAU) concentrations from the year 2016–2019 in five Indian megacities (where red line represents BAU PM concentration trend, and the blue line represents PM concentration in 2020 during different periods)

Considering 07:00 am to 11:00 am as peak rush hour, the average PM2.5 concentrations in Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata Mumbai, and New Delhi in this period have decreased by 48.5%, 23.8%, 63.4%, 56.37, and 21.3%, respectively. A late evening hour (after 22:00 h) peak of PM2.5 was observed in all megacities, as shown in Fig. 2. This could be linked to the decrease in night temperature and boundary level height. The current study indicates that PM2.5 concentrations in megacities fall significantly and show the impact of various anthropogenic activities. During the lockdown period, regional and local sources such as emission from the rural household due to solid biomass fuel use may contribute to PM2.5 levels. These emissions are reported to dominate in the rural areas of India (Sidhu et al. 2017; Ravindra and Smith 2018; Kaur-Sidhu et al. 2020, and Ravindra et al. 2019a, 2019b). However, air pollution reduction was noticed all over India, and hence, these contributions will have a minimum impact on the megacities’ air quality.

In the pre-lockdown period (PLDN), the highest average PM2.5 concentration in New Delhi, Mumbai, and Hyderabad was at morning hours, i.e., 09:00 h as 90.3 μg m−3, 71 μg m−3, and 43.6 μg m-3, respectively. In contrast, the highest average PM2.5 concentration in Chennai was observed at 08:00 h as 39.4 μg m−3 and in Kolkata at 00:00 h as 84.7 μg m−3. In business as usual (BAU-PM) trends for matching period (2016–2019), the peak hour of PM2.5 concentration in all megacities, i.e., Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata Mumbai, and New Delhi, was at 08:00 h having an average concentration of 39.2 μg m−3, 77.8 μg m−3, 87.3 μg m−3, 91.4 μg m−3, and 145.2 μg m−3 respectively. During the lockdown, the highest average PM2.5 concentration in New Delhi was at 08:00 h as 70.1 μg m−3, which was 122.7 μg m−3 in BAU matching period (BAU-LM). Similarly, in Chennai, the highest average PM2.5 concentration during lockdown was at 07:00 h as 17.4 μg m-3, which was earlier at 19:00 h as 23.4 μg m−3 in BAU-LM. In Kolkata, during lockdown, the highest average PM2.5 concentration was observed at 14:00 h (29.3 μg m−3), whereas in Mumbai, it was at 04:00 h as 14.7 μg m−3 and in Hyderabad at 22:00 h as 37.9 μg m−3.

In contrast, in BAU-LM PM2.5, the highest concentrations in Kolkata, Mumbai, and Hyderabad were at 15:00 h as 45.5, at 08:00 h as 39.7 μg m−3, and at 22:00 h as 64.0 μg m-3, respectively. In the unlock period, PM2.5 highest concentration in New Delhi was at 23:00 h as 34.9 μg m−3, Chennai at 20:00 h as 22.4 μg m−3, Kolkata at 15:00 h as 19.0 μg m−3, Mumbai at 10:00 h as 27.8 μg m−3, and Hyderabad at 21:00 h as 17.0 μg m−3. In the BAU matching period of unlocking (BAU-UM), the highest PM2.5 concentration in Chennai and Hyderabad was at 21:00 h as 32.7 μg m−3 and 33 μg m−3, in Kolkata at 14:00 h as 33.8 μg m−3, in Mumbai at 22:00 as 27.7 μg m−3, and in New Delhi at 23:00 h as 46.3 μg m−3. The change in peak hours of PM2.5 clearly shows the impacts of restriction timings in lockdown and unlocking period.

Variation in PM2.5 levels during different phases of lockdown and unlocking period

The study analyzed the variations in PM2.5 levels during the various lockdown and unlocking phases (Fig. 3) where the period from the 25th of March 2020 to the 14th of April 2020 was lockdown 1 (LDN1), from the 15th of April 2020 to the 3rd of May 2020 was lockdown 2 (LDN2), from the 4th of May 2020 to the 17th of May 2020 was lockdown 3 (LDN3), and from the 18th of May 2020 to the 31st of May 2020 was lockdown 4 (LDN4). The unlocking took place in 3 phases in which unlocking 1 (ULC1) was from the 1st of June 2020 to the 30th of June 2020, followed by unlocking 2 (ULC2) from the 1st of July 2020to the 31st of July 2020, and unlocking 3 (ULC3) from the 1st of August 2020 to the 31st of August 2020. Table 2 shows the percentage change in PM2.5 concentration during different phases of lockdown and unlocking period in five Indian megacities.

Fig. 3

Boxplot of variation in concentration of PM2.5 (μg m−3) in five Indian megacities during different phases of study and its comparison with business as usual (BAU) PM2.5 concentrations from the year 2016–2019

Table 2

Percentage change in concentration of PM2.5 (μg m−3) in five Indian megacities during different phases of lockdown and unlocking period

Locations	Percentage change in PM2.5 concentration (%)
	During the lockdown period compared to before the lockdown period					During the unlocking period compared to the lockdown period
	Before lockdown	LDN1	LDN2	LDN3	LDN4	Overall lockdown	Overall unlocking
Chennai	21.8 ± 10.0	− 11.1	− 60.8	− 60.7	− 4.5	− 34.2	+ 22.7
Hyderabad	34.3 ± 10.9	+ 2.9	− 19.6	− 22.8	− 3.1	− 9.9	− 60.9
Kolkata	65.1 ± 30.1	− 36.9	− 70.9	− 71.6	− 78.1	− 62.0	− 42.7
Mumbai	48.6 ± 20.6	− 24.4	− 52.0	− 58.9	− 69.8	− 49.3	− 52.9
New Delhi	60.0 ± 18.4	− 37.1	− 32.0	− 15.5	− 13.1	− 26.3	− 30.9

In lockdown 1 with stricter restrictions, the concentration of PM2.5 decreased significantly (compared to that before the lockdown period) in all megacities except for Hyderabad. The reduction was highest in New Delhi (37.1%), followed by Kolkata (36.9%), Mumbai (24.4%), and Chennai (11.1%), whereas in Hyderabad, the concentration increased by 2.9%. In the other three phases of lockdowns, the PM2.5 showed a declining trend in all megacities. Kolkata shows the highest reduction in lockdowns 2, 3, and 4 as 70.9%, 71.6%, and 78.1%, respectively, whereas the minimum decrease in PM concentration was observed in lockdowns 2 and 4 in Hyderabad.

In the unlocking period, all megacities showed a declining concentration of PM2.5 except for Chennai compared to the average concentration of PM2.5 during the lockdown period. Hyderabad shows a maximum reduction of 60.9%, whereas Chennai shows an increment of 22.7%. The impact of monsoons on PM2.5 concentration is visible from the results and discussed in the subsequent section. The percentage variations in PM2.5 concentration within lockdown phases are shown in Supplementary Table 2, and it can be seen that concentration increases as the lockdown period increases in many megacities. This may be due to relaxations, which were given in the last phases of lockdown as some commercial activities started during this period.

There was a significant decline in the concentration of PM2.5 in all phases of the study compared to BAU data trends. Compared to matching BAU data, the percentage decline in PM2.5 levels in the pre-lockdown period was 2.6–41.3%. The percentage decline during the lockdown period was 25.3–44.3%. In the unlocking period, PM2.5 decline 25.3–55.7% in various megacities. Table 3 depicts the average PM2.5 concentration during different phases of study and its comparison with the matching business as usual (BAU) period along with the percentage change in concentration of PM2.5 in five Indian megacities. There were few rainfall events recorded during the pre-lockdown period, resulting in a decrease in the average PM2.5 levels compared with the matching BAU period. However, during monsoon, the highest drop can be attributed to both monsoon and low background concentration of PM2.5 in the atmosphere due to lockdown.

Table 3

Average PM2.5 concentration during different phases of study and its comparison with matching business as usual (BAU) period along with percentage change in concentration of PM2.5 (μg m−3) in five Indian megacities

	Chennai	Hyderabad	Kolkata	Mumbai	New Delhi
Average PM2.5 concentration (μg m−3) in Pre-Lock down (PLDN)	21.8 ± 10.0	34.3 ± 10.9	65.1 ± 30.1	48.6 ± 20.6	60.0 ± 18.4
Average PM2.5 concentration (μg m−3) in BAU-PM (PLDN matching period)	22.4 ± 4.5	58.5 ± 7.6	76.0 ± 9.4	68.8 ± 24.4	80.1 ± 18.2
Percentage change in PLDN from BAU-PM (%)	− 2.6	− 41.3	− 14.3	−29.3	− 25.1
Average PM2.5 concentration (μg m−3) Lockdown (LDN)	14.4 ± 8.7	30.9 ± 8.1	24.7 ± 13.7	24.6 ± 9.7	44.2 ± 16.3
Average PM2.5 concentration (μg m−3) in BAU-LM (LDN matching period)	20.3 ± 4.8	50.9 ± 7.8	39.7 ± 7.3	33.0 ± 13.6	79.4 ± 21.0
Percentage change in LDN from BAU-LM (%)	− 29.0	− 39.3	− 37.7	− 25.3	− 44.3
Average PM2.5 concentration (μg m−3) in Unlock (ULC)	17.5 ± 5.8	11.8 ± 5.0	13.2 ± 8.2	12.5 ± 6.1	31.1 ± 13.4
Average PM2.5 concentration (μg m−3) in BAU-UM (ULC matching period)	25.8 ± 3.7	25.4 ± 5.9	29.7 ± 6.4	24.8 ± 6.8	41.7 ± 14.0
Percentage change in ULC from BAU-UM (%)	− 32.1	− 53.5	− 55.7	− 49.8	− 25.3

Meteorological conditions and PM2.5 levels during the lockdown period

Meteorological parameters play a significant role in the reduction of fine ambient particles. Figure 4 shows the variations in daily average temperature and relative humidity and rainfall along with PM2.5 concentrations during various phases of the study period in all five megacities. The average temperature ranged from 20.7 ± 2.3 to 28.5 ± 0.6 °C in all megacities before the lockdown period and increased to 29.0 ± 3.8 to 31.7 ± 2.1 °C during the lockdown period, as shown in Table 4. During unlocking except for New Delhi, the average temperature decreased in all megacities compared to that during the lockdown period. The relative humidity was lower in the lockdown period in all megacities as it was the season of dry summers in India.

Fig. 4

Variations in daily PM2.5 concentration along with average temperature (°C), relative humidity (%), and rainfall (mm) during the study period in five Indian megacities

Table 4

Average temperature, average relative humidity, and the total rainfall during different study periods in all megacities

Locations	Before lockdown			During lockdown			During unlocking
	T (°C)	RH (%)	Rainfall (mm)	T (°C)	RH (%)	Rainfall (mm)	T (°C)	RH (%)	Rainfall (mm)
Chennai	28.5 ± 0.6	73.9 ± 2.0	0	31.1 ± 1.7	72.4 ± 5.2	41	30.3 ± 1.6	73.8 ± 6.6	422.0
Hyderabad	27.5 ± 1.0	60.8 ± 6.5	23.5	31.7 ± 2.1	46.1 ± 8.5	62.8	27.0 ± 1.9	77.3 ± 9.7	603
Kolkata	25.6 ± 1.4	66.5 ± 8.4	81.4	29.5 ± 2.1	71.2 ± 12.0	429.1	29.7 ± 1.4	85.4 ± 6.7	1139.3
Mumbai	26.1 ± 1.3	62.1 ± 8.0	0	30.4 ± 1.1	69.9 ± 4.7	0	28.4 ± 1.4	83.7 ± 6.4	2949.0
New Delhi	20.7 ± 2.3	79.0 ± 6.6	97.4	29.0 ± 3.8	55.5 ± 13.1	71.4	31.4 ± 2.4	75.4 ± 9.7	552.3

During lockdown except for Mumbai, there were short rain events that were observed in all megacities, which also played a significant role in the reduction of PM2.5 during the lockdown period. Kolkata shows the highest total rainfall of 429.1 mm, followed by New Delhi (71.4 mm). During the unlocking period, falling in monsoon season, rain (ranging from 603 to 2949 mm) played a major role in washout the particulate matter from the atmosphere and hence reduced the PM2.5 concentration. As discussed earlier, only Chennai showed an increase in PM2.5 concentration during the unlocking period compared to the lockdown period. This could be linked to the limited (least) rainfall in this megacity. It can be inferred from the rainfall data that it has a significant impact on PM2.5 levels and its concentration decreased with the increasing amount of rainfall irrespective of anthropogenic air pollution.

Air quality in lockdown and implication for better air quality

During the lockdown period, this work and other recent studies highlighted the impact of restricted anthropogenic activities on air quality across India and other parts of the world (Sharma et al. 2020; Jain and Sharma 2020; Mahato et al. 2020; Dantas et al. 2020; Chauhan and Singh 2020; Mor et al. 2020). In India, particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and NO2 show a significant reduction of up to 40–50% in the many megacities during the lockdown period as highlighted by Jain and Sharma (2020), Mahato et al. (2020), Singh et al. (2020a), and Biswal et al. (2020). The air quality index (AQI) improved by 15–44% in India’s different parts (Sharma et al. 2020). Generally, air quality in megacities is affected by emission sources, atmospheric reactivity, and meteorology.

In India, significant air pollution reduction during COVID-19 lockdown is primarily due to the decrease in major anthropogenic activities such as vehicles, industries, and other fugitive sources such as household cooking, emissions from local industries, food eateries (street food vendors, semi-open cooking in restaurants using tandoors), including other non-exhaust emissions. The meteorology also played an important role in emission reduction during the lockdown as intermittent rain events were also observed during the lockdown in some parts of India. Sharma et al. (2020) also reported that meteorology was favorable during the lockdown; otherwise, the predicted PM2.5 levels could be around 33% higher than levels reported during the lockdown, respectively.

As discussed above, the source contribution to the total PM2.5 emission load varies from city to city due to their traffic density, industrial activity, and population lifestyle. Local meteorology and local emission sources such as traffic have a substantial role in building PM2.5 concentration at urban sites. Table 5 shows the business as usual source apportionment/contribution of various sources of PM2.5 in studied megacities. As depicted in Table 5, the PM2.5 from vehicular exhaust and dust emission (non-exhaust emissions, construction) contributes more than 40% in Delhi, Hyderabad, and Mumbai, whereas, for Kolkata and Chennai, industrial emission has the highest share. During the lockdown, it can be expected that the majority of industrial emissions, exhaust and non-exhaust emissions, all construction and demolition emissions, waste burning emissions were missing. As most industries were closed during the lockdown, the megacities with the highest industrial emissions, i.e., Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai, show the highest reduction in lockdown. Also, as the movement was restricted, the exhaust and non-exhaust emissions from vehicle movement also reduced the PM2.5 load in the atmosphere for a megacity like New Delhi.

Table 5

Business as usual source apportionment/contribution of various sources in PM2.5 in various megacities along with percentage change in PM2.5 concentration during lockdown

	PM2.5 emissions sources and their contribution in all megacities							Percentage change inPM2.5 concentration (%)
Source	Transport (%)	All dust (%)	Residential (%)	Industrial (%)	Waste burning (%)	DG sets (%)	Brick kiln (%)	Overall lockdown
Chennai	12.55	6.11	1.54	69.86	5.42	0.85	3.67	− 34.2#
Hyderabad	20.86	26.33	3.74	28.78	9.64	6.04	4.60	− 9.9#
Kolkata	7.37	9.01	8.73	54.79	7.08	5.27	7.76	− 62.0#
Mumbai	26.00	16.00	2.00	42.00	5.00	5.00	4.00	− 49.3#
New Delhi	38.70*	26.50*	8.70*	14.30*	3.70*	–	–	− 26.3#

Source: Urban Emission (2019)

*TERI Report (2018); # Current work

In agreement with the current study, all the above studies also shed some light on the factors leading to air quality improvement, where air pollution levels remain relatively high and attaining the standard norms is a challenge. In the past, measures like odd-even traffic restrictions and air pollution emergencies were implemented in megacities such as New Delhi. However, this could not make a measurable impact on air pollution levels (Kumar et al. 2017; Sharma et al. 2017). Hence, measures and policies to control air pollution in these megacities cities are needed to be revisited. Furthermore, strategies are required to minimize air pollution in their satellite cities and neighboring regions to have a holistic air pollution control approach.

There is a need to make policies inclined toward disincentivize motorized modes of transport and incentivize the non-motorized mode of transportation. The improvement in air quality during the lockdown also offers that when the AQI category becomes hazardous partial lockdowns could be initiated as a part of the graded response to improve the poor air quality in megacities like New Delhi. Sharma et al. (2020) reported that the mean excessive risks of PM reduced by ~ 52% in India during the lockdown period, although source contribution and chemical toxicity of PM need to investigate during the lockdown and non-lockdown period. This will further answer the query that “does the reduction in air pollution levels also reduces the toxic composition of the PM during the lockdown in the megacities?”

The improvement in air quality during lockdown also urges to understand how the population perceives the air quality. There have been many media reports about the improvement in air quality from several cities, but how it affects the individual behaviors for their contribution to air quality needs to be explored further. Hence, the behavioral aspect of the population during COVID-19 needs to be tapped to engage them toward sustainable practices and transform the momentum to promote air pollution reduction and ensure sustainability.

Conclusion

The lockdown in India was imposed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There was an impact of lockdown on daily mean PM2.5 concentrations in five Indian megacities. The PM2.5 concentration reduced significantly in all megacities and met the national standards after the lockdown. The maximum reduction in PM2.5 levels was observed in Kolkata (62%), followed by Mumbai (49%), Chennai (34%), and New Delhi (26%). Comparatively, Hyderabad exhibited a smaller reduction in PM2.5 concentration, i.e., 10%. However, meteorological parameters such as rainfall and air masses movement also played a significant role in PM reduction. The study reports a new baseline level of PM2.5 for five Indian megacities. This knowledge can be extended to plan future air pollution reduction strategies to minimize the impact of poor air quality on premature mortality and morbidity.

(DOCX 21 kb)