Literature DB >> 33415313

Leveraging multimodal microscopy to optimize deep learning models for cell segmentation.

William D Cameron1, Alex M Bennett1, Cindy V Bui1, Huntley H Chang1, Jonathan V Rocheleau.   

Abstract

Deep learning provides an opportunity to automatically segment and extract cellular features from high-throughput microscopy images. Many labeling strategies have been developed for this purpose, ranging from the use of fluorescent markers to label-free approaches. However, differences in the channels available to each respective training dataset make it difficult to directly compare the effectiveness of these strategies across studies. Here, we explore training models using subimage stacks composed of channels sampled from larger, "hyper-labeled," image stacks. This allows us to directly compare a variety of labeling strategies and training approaches on identical cells. This approach revealed that fluorescence-based strategies generally provide higher segmentation accuracies but were less accurate than label-free models when labeling was inconsistent. The relative strengths of label and label-free techniques could be combined through the use of merging fluorescence channels and using out-of-focus brightfield images. Beyond comparing labeling strategies, using subimage stacks for training was also found to provide a method of simulating a wide range of labeling conditions, increasing the ability of the final model to accommodate a greater range of candidate cell labeling strategies.
© 2021 Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33415313      PMCID: PMC7785326          DOI: 10.1063/5.0027993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APL Bioeng        ISSN: 2473-2877


  12 in total

1.  Use of fluorescent probes: their effect on cell biology and limitations.

Authors:  Ellen C Jensen
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Apollo-NADP(+): a spectrally tunable family of genetically encoded sensors for NADP(+).

Authors:  William D Cameron; Cindy V Bui; Ashley Hutchinson; Peter Loppnau; Susanne Gräslund; Jonathan V Rocheleau
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 3.  Toxicity of organic fluorophores used in molecular imaging: literature review.

Authors:  Raphael Alford; Haley M Simpson; Josh Duberman; G Craig Hill; Mikako Ogawa; Celeste Regino; Hisataka Kobayashi; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.488

4.  Cell damage and reactive oxygen species production induced by fluorescence microscopy: effect on mitosis and guidelines for non-invasive fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Ram Dixit; Richard Cyr
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry.

Authors:  Thorsten Falk; Dominic Mai; Robert Bensch; Özgün Çiçek; Ahmed Abdulkadir; Yassine Marrakchi; Anton Böhm; Jan Deubner; Zoe Jäckel; Katharina Seiwald; Alexander Dovzhenko; Olaf Tietz; Cristina Dal Bosco; Sean Walsh; Deniz Saltukoglu; Tuan Leng Tay; Marco Prinz; Klaus Palme; Matias Simons; Ilka Diester; Thomas Brox; Olaf Ronneberger
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Review of advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Chia-Pin Liang; Yang Liu; Andrew H Fischer; Anil V Parwani; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-05-28

7.  Evaluation of Deep Learning Strategies for Nucleus Segmentation in Fluorescence Images.

Authors:  Juan C Caicedo; Jonathan Roth; Allen Goodman; Tim Becker; Kyle W Karhohs; Matthieu Broisin; Csaba Molnar; Claire McQuin; Shantanu Singh; Fabian J Theis; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Bright field microscopy as an alternative to whole cell fluorescence in automated analysis of macrophage images.

Authors:  Jyrki Selinummi; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Irina Podolsky; Adrian Ozinsky; Elizabeth Gold; Olli Yli-Harja; Alan Aderem; Ilya Shmulevich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A deep learning-based algorithm for 2-D cell segmentation in microscopy images.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Kofahi; Alla Zaltsman; Robert Graves; Will Marshall; Mirabela Rusu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling.

Authors:  Juan C Caicedo; Sam Cooper; Florian Heigwer; Scott Warchal; Peng Qiu; Csaba Molnar; Aliaksei S Vasilevich; Joseph D Barry; Harmanjit Singh Bansal; Oren Kraus; Mathias Wawer; Lassi Paavolainen; Markus D Herrmann; Mohammad Rohban; Jane Hung; Holger Hennig; John Concannon; Ian Smith; Paul A Clemons; Shantanu Singh; Paul Rees; Peter Horvath; Roger G Linington; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  3 in total

1.  Laminin matrix regulates beta-cell FGFR5 expression to enhance glucose-stimulated metabolism.

Authors:  Vidhant Pal; Yufeng Wang; Romario Regeenes; Dawn M Kilkenny; Jonathan V Rocheleau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Training a deep learning model for single-cell segmentation without manual annotation.

Authors:  Nizam Ud Din; Ji Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Computational solutions for spatial transcriptomics.

Authors:  Iivari Kleino; Paulina Frolovaitė; Tomi Suomi; Laura L Elo
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.155

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.