| Literature DB >> 33415292 |
Scott Ramsay1, Susan Dahinten1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sports-related concussions in children and youth are a significant health concern. There is increasing literature pertaining to levels of knowledge about concussion and the effects of educational interventions, but the literature has not yet been synthesized for the subpopulation of children and youth. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to identify and summarize the current state of the literature on concussion knowledge, and the effect of concussion education on the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of children and youth who engage in sports.Entities:
Keywords: children; concussion; education; knowledge; youth
Year: 2020 PMID: 33415292 PMCID: PMC7774435 DOI: 10.1177/2377960820938498
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SAGE Open Nurs ISSN: 2377-9608
Search Strategy and Number of Hits for Each Database.
| Source | Search strategy |
|
|---|---|---|
| CINAHL | (MH “Brain Concussion+”) AND (MH “Knowledge+”) OR (MH “Education+”) OR (MH “Attitude+”) AND (MH “Child+”) OR (MH “Adolescent+”) | |
| MEDLINE (EBSCOhost) | (MH “Brain Concussion+”) AND (MH “Knowledge”) OR (MH “Education+”) OR (MH “Attitude+”) AND (MH “Child+”) OR (MH “Adolescent”) | |
| Total |
Note. CINAHL = Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; MH = Mesh Heading.
Figure 1.Flowchart of Article Selection.
Description of Studies and Study Findings Pertaining to Research Question 1 (Level of Knowledge and Associated Factors).
| Authors (year)Country | Purpose | Sample and setting | Research design and methods | Findings: knowledge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| To explore awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of traumatic brain injury among young athletes and their parents | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataOnline survey to measure: knowledge and attitudes | • Majority of youth (84%) reported hearing about concussion, but only one quarter demonstrated a basic understanding of concussion. | ||
| To determine high school soccer players past concussion education and the likelihood of notifying their coach of concussion symptoms | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataMailed survey to measure: behavioral intentions | • More players with concussion education reported they would
always notify someone of a concussion compared with those
without concussion education (72% vs. 36%). • Concussion
education was associated with intentions to report a
concussion during a championship game ( | ||
| To identify barriers to concussive symptom reporting in high school athletics | Qualitative—descriptive focus groups interviewsThematic analysisFocus group interviews to assess concussion knowledge and identify barriers in behavioral intentions to report concussion | • Participants were able to describe numerous signs and symptoms of concussion and were aware of the dangers and possible long-term effects of concussions.• However, most participants said that they would not cease playing when concussed and would be hesitant to report symptoms to coaches if they did not result in significant pain or disability because both female and male athletes had received negative messages from coaches when reporting injuries. | ||
| To determine concussion level of concussion knowledge in high school football players after the initiation of new concussion-education legislation | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataWritten survey to measure: knowledge | • Twenty-five percent of participants reported having received no education; 60% had received formal concussion education in class or online, and 54% had received education from their parents.• Overall, displayed limited knowledge of signs, symptoms, and consequences of concussion.• Concussion symptoms of headache, dizziness, and confusion were identified by 97%, 93%, and 90% of participants, respectively, but few participants correctly identified symptoms such as behavior and personality change, trouble falling asleep, being more emotional, and being nervous or anxious. | ||
| To assess minor hockey participants’ knowledge about concussion | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataIn person survey to measure: knowledge | • Knowledge varied by age. • Fourteen-year old players were more knowledgeable than 10-year old players, and elite players were more knowledgeable than nonelite players, but many participants had misconceptions about concussions.• More 10-year olds than 14-year olds did not know how a concussion occurred (63% vs. 25%).• Twenty-five percent to 50% of players were only aware of one symptom or less of a concussion, and almost half of players (48% of 10-year olds and 44% of 14-year olds) misidentified concussion treatment. | ||
| To assess incidence of concussion and attitudes about concussion in Irish schools’ rugby union players | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataWritten survey to measure: knowledge and attitudes | • Sixty-one percent of players had received some information about concussion and 25% had specific knowledge about return-to-play protocols.• A majority of players identified concussion as a serious health risk (82%).• More players with past diagnosis with a concussion reported they would play an important match even if they were concussed than those who had never experienced a concussion (82% vs. 70%). • Most participants (90%) reported that they would benefit from further concussion education, with most preferring a booklet (36%) or presentation (45%). | ||
| To explore the knowledge of, and attitudes toward, concussion within an English youth rugby population | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataWritten survey to measure: knowledge and attitudes | • The majority of participants were able to identify a concussion as a brain injury (99%) and were aware that suffering a concussion is a risk for another (91%), and that losing consciousness was not required to suffer a concussion (82%).• Gaps in knowledge: incorrect belief that concussion could occur only from a hit to the head (80%) and being able to identify rest as the appropriate treatment for concussion (only 2%).• Ninety-seven percent of participants reported they would tell their coach if hit in the head, but 20% reported that they would continue to play. | ||
| To understand young children’s scope of knowledge about concussion and identify what they believe to be strategies for risk reduction | Qualitative descriptiveIndividual interviews to assess concussion knowledge | • Most participants reported having heard the word concussion and had a general sense of the nature of injury.• Half the children knew that concussions could be incurred through sport.• The authors concluded that children between 6 and 8 years of age “tend to have a reasonably accurate, although limited, conceptions about concussions,” and that study findings could be used to inform the development of age appropriate educational interventions. | ||
| To identify factors that influence concussion knowledge and self-reported attitudes in high school athletes | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataWritten survey to measure: knowledge, attitudes, behavioral intentions | • Knowledge and attitudes (intention to report) varied by age.• Older age, female gender, basketball and soccer participation, and previous concussion education were associated with higher levels of knowledge.• Younger age, female gender, and soccer participation were associated with more positive intended concussion reporting behaviors.• Higher concussion knowledge was not associated with higher intended self-reported behaviors. | ||
| To evaluate minor hockey players’ knowledge and attitudes toward concussion | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataWritten survey to measure: knowledge, attitudes, behavioral intentions | • Knowledge varied by age and participation in hockey.• Almost all players had foundational concussion knowledge but 56% underestimated the prevalence and 30% lacked awareness of return to play protocols.• Hockey players demonstrated significantly higher knowledge of the cause and prevalence of concussion than nonhockey players. • Younger hockey players were less able to correctly identify the cause of concussions than older hockey players.• Despite the high level of knowledge about reporting and ceasing to play when hit in the head (95%), only 78% stated that they would stop and report a concussion; and only 43% of those who had received a concussion had stopped playing and reported it.• No gender differences in knowledge of return to play protocols or following protocol when concussed, although the reasons given varied by age and gender. | ||
| To compare knowledge, perceptions and attitudes of concussion in previously concussed versus nonconcussed youth soccer players | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional data Written survey to measure: knowledge and attitudes | • Results indicated a high level of concussion knowledge but with some need for additional education• Knowledge varied by gender. Females had higher knowledge scores than males.• There were no significant differences in knowledge scores or attitude scores for concussed versus nonconcussed participants. | ||
| To examine the influence of knowledge and attitude on concussion reporting among a sample of high school athletes | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataSurveyMailed survey to measure: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors | • Higher concussion knowledge scores were associated with
more frequent reporting of concussion and
| ||
| To examine the association between self-reported concussion history and measures of concussion knowledge, attitude, and disclosure behavior | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataSurveyWritten survey that measures: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors | • Number of past concussions was not associated with level of concussion knowledge.• A higher number of concussions were associated with having a less positive attitude, as there was a decrease in the self-reported proportion of concussion events disclosed, and an increase in self-reported participation while experiencing signs and symptoms of concussion. | ||
| To document high school players’ understanding and attitudes toward concussion return to play guidelines | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataSurvey to measure: knowledge and behavioral intentions | • Majority of players were aware of the term “concussion” and most had reasonable knowledge of the signs and symptoms of concussion; although 25% thought “being knocked out cold” was the best descriptor of a concussion.• Only half were aware of concussion guidelines; and only 61% reported they understood concussion.• Twenty-seven percent of players agreed that a player with a suspected concussion should play in an important game. | ||
| To examine sex differences in high school athletes’ knowledge of sport-related concussion symptoms and reporting behaviors | Quantitative—descriptive cross-sectional dataSurveyIn person survey to measure: knowledge and behavioral intentions | • There were gaps in knowledge, with 50% or fewer participants able to identify four common signs and symptoms.• Many gender differences were found for knowledge. • Females showed higher concussion symptom knowledge than males.• Males were less likely than females in intending to report a concussion because they thought their coach would get mad; their teammates would think that they were weak; their coach would think that they were weak; their parents would be upset; they did not want to miss a game; they did not want to lose playing time; their team was going to the playoffs when it happened; or they did not want to let their team down. |
Description of Studies and Study Findings Pertaining to Research Question 2 (Evaluation of Educational Interventions).
| Authors (Year)Country | Purpose | Sample and setting | Research design, intervention, and methods | FindingsImpact of interventions on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the effectiveness of the Sports Legacy Institute Community Educators (SLICE) program for youth concussion learning and knowledge | Prospective cohort study (a single-group quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design)Intervention: SLICE workshop administered at high school; learning activities included interactive demonstrations, case studies, and personal testimony.Measures: knowledge measured immediately before and after the presentation. | • Improvements in knowledge varied by age and gender.• Posttest knowledge scores improved for all students, but pass rates on the posttest were higher for females and older students (13+ years). | ||
| To evaluate the ThinkFirst Canada, smart hockey, brain, and spinal cord injury prevention video | Mixed methods: randomized controlled trial (pretest–posttest) for players and qualitative interviews with coachesIntervention: The Smart Hockey video was shown to experimental teams at mid-season. Measures: Knowledge measured at baseline, 5-minute postvideo, and 3 months postvideo. Behavior (penalties) measured at end of the season. | • Knowledge levels improved in the treatment group immediately postvideo and was maintained to 3 months (whereas there was no pre–post change in knowledge for the control group). • High risk checking penalties decreased for the treatment group. • Qualitative data from coaches provided suggestions for improving the video and identified other potential injury preventative initiatives. There was consensus that changing coaching behaviors would have the greatest impact on player behavior. | ||
| To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational video on concussion knowledge in minor league hockey players | Cluster randomized controlled trial Intervention: The Smart Hockey video was shown to teams in the experimental group. Measures: knowledge measured at baseline, postvideo, and 2 months; attitude and behavior measured at baseline and 2 months only. | • Knowledge scores increased postvideo for the treatment group, but the increase was not maintained to 2 months, and there were no differences between the intervention and control groups at 2 months, after controlling for prior knowledge level, age, and competitive level.• Attitude and behavior scores did not differ between groups at 2 months (was not assessed postvideo). | ||
| To evaluate the impact of a multimodel concussion education program on knowledge of and attitudes about concussion | Prospective, cohort study (a single group quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design)Intervention: At the beginning of season, each team received a 30-minute educational presentation based on materials from Parachute Canada.Measures: knowledge and attitudes measured at baseline, after presentation and 4 to 6 months | • Concussion knowledge scores increased from pre- to postpresentation and from prepresentation to 4- to 6-month follow-up • Only Bantam concussion attitude scores increased from pre- to postpresentation, but the increase was not maintained to follow-up.• There was no significant change in the older midget attitude scores. | ||
| To evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based resource in improving postconcussion management in high schools | Mixed methods: randomized controlled trial (pretest–posttest) for athletes and parents, and qualitative interviewing with parents and school administratorsIntervention: In the fall, athletes were given access to an online interactive modules on recognizing and managing sports concussion.Measures: knowledge and behavioral intention among students and parents measured immediately before and after the education intervention and concussion logs | • The treatment group showed higher posttest scores than the control group on concussion knowledge, knowledge application, and behavioral intention to report concussion. • No significant differences in concussion incidence between treatment and control groups. • Significant difference between treatment and control groups in knowledge of effective concussion management practices.• Qualitative data revealed that the intervention schools were more likely to create a concussion management team and have an assigned coordinator. | ||
| To evaluate the impact of preseason concussion education on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of high school athletes | Prospective, cohort study (quasi-experimental pretest–posttest with comparison group)Intervention: At the beginning of the season, each team was given a 20-minute educational lecture. Measures: knowledge, attitude, and behaviors measured at baseline (preseason), immediately following the intervention, and postseason. | • Knowledge and attitude–behavior scores increased from baseline to postintervention for the treatment group but were not maintained to postseason.• Students in the treatment group were less likely to continue playing with concussion symptoms than those in the control group; however, there was no significant difference in the proportion of students with concussion diagnoses who reported returning to play before their symptoms had resolved. |