| Literature DB >> 33415211 |
Amy Y Zhang1, Xinyi Xu2.
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review of literature from the years 2000 through 2017 on the prevalence and burden of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men aged 50 and older, and medical treatments of and alternative nonmedical approaches to LUTS. EBSCOhost (Medline with Full Text) was searched for observational, experimental, and review studies in peer-reviewed journals in the English language. Our review found that LUTS were highly prevalent in the world and estimated to affect 2.3 billion people in 2018, with 44.7% being men. Men with LUTS suffer from not only burdensome symptoms such as nocturia and urgency but also adverse psychological consequences (e.g., anxiety and depression) and financial burden. Current medical treatments are clinically effective, but their efficacy is compromised by side effects and low compliance rates. Alternative nonmedical treatments for LUTS were also sought worldwide. There is evidence that lifestyle modifications such as pelvic muscle exercises and bladder training, physical activity, dietary modification, and nutritional supplements can alleviate LUTS and improve patient quality of life; however, evidence based on rigorous methodology remains minimal and cannot be generalized across populations. Evidence of effectiveness of weight loss programs to reduce LUTS is inconclusive. We conclude that although behavioral treatment is a promising approach to alleviating LUTS, especially when combined with medical treatments, well-designed randomized controlled and longitudinal clinical trials on behavioral treatments of LUTS are still needed. Minimally invasive procedures and neuromodulation therapy also show positive results of alleviating LUTS but require further research as well.Entities:
Keywords: LUTS burden; LUTS prevalence; QOL; behavioral intervention; lower urinary tract symptoms
Year: 2018 PMID: 33415211 PMCID: PMC7774430 DOI: 10.1177/2377960818811773
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SAGE Open Nurs ISSN: 2377-9608
Figure 1.Flowchart of the search process.
LUTS = lower urinary tract symptoms.
A Summary of Reviewed Studies.
| No. | Author(s), Year | Purpose | Methodology | Sample | Main findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 1 |
| To describe the prevalence, severity, and symptom bother of LUTS in men with/without overactive bladder | Secondary data analysis of the EPIC study, a multinational population-based survey | More men with overactive bladder report moderate-to-severe LUTS than the general population (30% vs. 6%). Nocturia was the most common symptom. | LUTS severity might be underestimated by the IPSS, which does not assess incontinence. | |
| 2 |
| To assess the prevalence and associated bother of LUTS in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden in the EpiLUTS study | Cross-sectional, population-based survey | 72.3% of men had at least one LUTS; bothersome LUTS are leaking urine during sexual activity (82.1%), urgency with fear of leaking (73.3%), leaking for no reason (72.1%), nocturnal enuresis (71.5%). | ||
| 3 |
| To determine LUTS prevalence in China, Taiwan, and South Korea using International Continence Society 2002 criteria | Internet-based self-administered survey study; descriptive statistics and post hoc significance testing | LUTS prevalence was slightly higher in men than women (62.8% vs. 59.6%; | Conducting the study via Internet may result in bias by including only individuals with Internet access. The study selected China, South Korea, and Taiwan on the basis of the highest Internet penetration rates within Asia in 2015 (50%, 92%, and 84%, respectively). | |
| 4 |
| To assess the prevalence and bother of LUTS in the population aged ≥40 years in five major cities of Brazil | Telephone survey with assessment of LUTS using a standardized protocol | The prevalence of LUTS (symptoms occurring less than half the time or more) was 69% in men. Moderate-to-severe symptoms were present in 21% of men. | Limitations included self-reporting of LUTS without medical evaluation, reliance upon telephone interviews during which individuals may not always provide accurate answers, and possible selection bias because of the requirement for telephone contact. | |
| 5 |
| To evaluate the EpiLUTS among men and women in Netherlands, France, United Kingdom, and South Korea | Population-based, cross-sectional survey | 19.2% to 25.1% reported moderate-to-severe LUTS in a population-based survey of 4,979 men | ||
| 6 |
| To estimate the prevalence of LUTS in the elderly Danish population. Furthermore, to evaluate the QOL, the health-care seeking behavior and treatment with relation to LUTS | Mailed questionnaire | The median IPSS was 4 in males. Overall 28% of males had significant LUTS (IPSS>7). | ||
| 7 |
| To estimate and predict worldwide and regional prevalence of LUTS in 2008, 2013, and 2018 | An estimation model using prevalence data from the EPIC study and population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau International Data Base | N/A | An estimated 45.2% of the 2008 worldwide population (4.3 billion) was affected by at least one LUTS. By 2018, an estimated 2.3 billion individuals will be affected by at least one LUTS (18.4% increase). | The prevalence results are approximations and not true values. |
| 8 |
| To describe the prevalence, severity, and health correlates of LUTS in older community-dwelling U.S. men | Secondary data analysis of the MrOS study | LUTS were absent in 2.3%, mild in 51.6%, moderate in 39.6%, and severe in 6.6%. | Results may not apply to younger, less healthy or institutionalized men, men with catheters. | |
| 9 |
| To assess the influence of lifestyle factors and comorbidities on LUTS in Boston Community. | Multistage stratified cluster random sample; epidemiologic survey | LUTS prevalence was 18.7%, with similar rates by sex, race/ethnicity. | Not discussed | |
| 10 |
| To assess the LUTS prevalence in U.S. men by age, race/ ethnicity and comorbid ED | Survey study | The LUTS prevalence was 28%. The most frequent LUTS subtype was isolated storage symptoms (13%), followed by mixed (9%) and isolated voiding symptoms (6%). | The prevalence of storage LUTS (13%) might be underestimated because patients with daytime frequency or nocturia without urgency were not considered. | |
| 11 |
| To estimate the LUTS prevalence and assess patients' intent to discuss LUTS with their PCP | Self-administered questionnaire; analyzable blood sample; digital rectal exam | 42% men had IPSS > 7; 48% had an enlarged prostate based on digital rectal exam, and 43% had PSA more or equal to 1.5 ng/ml | PCPs who see younger patients or less than 50 patients a week were excluded. | |
| 12 |
| To estimate the prevalence of LUTS and assess whether it varies by race/ethnicity | Survey study, using multistage stratified clustered probability sample | Men without surgery, 59.9% of 60 to 69 years old and 75.1% ≥ 70 had at least one symptom. Older white and Black men were not different in having LUTS. | Potential bias in self-reporting | |
| 13 |
| To assess the burden and unmet need from LUTS/BPH with focus on the United Kingdom. | Systematic review | The prevalence of LUTS increases by age, for example, 3.5% in men aged 45–49 up to > 30% in men aged > 85 years in United Kingdom. | This study reviewed some global literature without inclusion of major European epidemiologic studies that did not focus on burden of LUTS. | |
| 14 |
| To explore the risk factors and comorbid conditions associated with subgroups of LUTS in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden from the EpiLUTS study | Cross-sectional, population-representative survey | Described comorbid conditions significantly associated with the voiding + storage + postmicturition subgroup of LUTS; risk factors for LUTS. | The account of comorbid conditions is based on participant self-report of a clinical diagnosis rather than a diagnosis verified by a clinician. | |
| 15 |
| Report the prevalence and growth rate of human BPH with age | Review of 10 studies | The prevalence of pathological BPH is 8% in 40th, but 50 % between 51 to 60 years old. | The data might be outdated. | |
| 16 |
| Review health-care utilization and cost associated with BPH | Review study | N/A | Summarizing the prevalence of BPH by age | Data were available only through 2000. |
| 17 |
| To review the medical and minimally invasive treatments for managing BPH | Systematic review | N/A | Report nearly 30% of men > 60 years of age experience troublesome LUTS due to BPH. | Findings might be limited by the keyword search and the use of search agent. |
| 18 |
| To assess the effects of medical, herbal, and surgical treatments on BPH | Systematic review | 63 RCTs, systematic reviews or observational studies | LUTS/BPH related bladder outlet obstruction may affect up to 30% of men in their early 70s. | Findings might be limited by the keyword search and the use of search agent. |
| 19 |
| To determine whether disparities exist in the reporting of LUTS across race/ethnicity | Community-based cohort study, questionnaire | Reported no significant difference in the prevalence of moderate or severe LUTS in non-Hispanic White (34%), Mexican-American (34%), African-American (33%) men. | Subjects may not have discussed urologic symptoms with physicians and may not recognize the severity of symptoms. Underreporting of symptom may exist. | |
| 20 |
| To investigate the roles of education, income, marital status, and source of health insurance on LUTS reporting among Black and White U.S. men | Large-scale prospective cohort study; survey by telephone interview or mailed questionnaire | The prevalence of moderate /severe LUTS was not significantly associated with race. Higher IPSS scores were significantly associated with lower income, marital status, and source of insurance. | Possible self-report bias, possible measurement error related to race | |
| 21 |
| To report the incidence of LUTS in a diverse population-based sample of men and women | A prospective cohort study with random sampling method and in-person interview | 5-year moderate-to-severe LUTS incidence was 8.5% for men. White men had lower LUTS incidence (7%) than all other sex and race subgroups (13%). | Calculation of LUTS incidence might be different from other studies. | |
| 22 |
| To examine risk factors for incident of BPH in the PCPT | Secondary analysis of the PCPT data | Risks for total BPH were 41% higher for Black ( | Self-report of symptoms is highly subjective and may differ across race, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. | |
| 23 |
| Review the prevalence of LUTS/BPH and risk factors | Review | N/A | Discussed the prevalence and modifiable risk factors for LUTS/BPH | |
| 24 |
| To evaluate the association of vitamin D levels and LUTS among U.S. men | Cross-sectional survey | Vitamin D deficiency was a significant risk factor for LUTS | ||
| 25 |
| To evaluate the LUTS impact on urinary-specific HRQOL, generic health indices, depression, and anxiety | Cross-sectional population-representative survey | Subgroups of LUTS and their percentages were reported. The largest group had storage + voiding + postmicturition; the smallest group had storage + postmicturition. | Data are self-reported. | |
| 26 |
| To examine the prevalence of LUTS in men of the general population | Survey study | 54.8% reported worse LUTS, but 27.1% reported improvement in the 4th follow-up; nocturia was the most common symptom. | Possible self-report bias | |
| 27 |
| To determine particular symptoms cluster of LUTS | Secondary analysis | Nocturia of twice or more per night (12%); terminal dribble (11%); urgency (10%); multiple symptoms (9%); and postvoid incontinence (5%) | ||
| 28 |
| To characterize the progression and treatment of LUTS among men aged 45–69 in the California Men's Health Study | A cohort study and survey | Of the 9,640 men with no/mild baseline LUTS, 3,993 (41%) had moderate/severe LUTS at 4-year follow-up. Of them, 3,634 (91.0%) had no treatment recorded. | 40% dropout at the follow-up. The participation bias cannot be excluded. | |
|
| ||||||
| 29 |
| To describe LUTS prevalence, severity, and symptom bother in men with/without overactive bladder in the EPIC study | Secondary analysis of data from EPIC, a multinational population-based survey | Symptom bother significantly increased by the number of LUTS. | LUTS severity might be underestimated by the IPSS, which does not assess incontinence. | |
| 30 |
| To identify the population- and individual-level burden of LUTS | Population-based cross-sectional study survey | Reported LUTS burdens were urgency (7.9%), stress urinary incontinence (6.5%), nocturia (6.0%), postmicturition dribble (5.8%), and urgency urinary incontinence (5.0%). | Did not collect information on seeking health care | |
| 31 |
| To assess the prevalence and associated bother of LUTS in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden in the EpiLUTS study | Cross-sectional, population-based survey | Men were bothered by urgency (73.3%), leakage especially during sexual activity (82.1%); and nocturia (71.5%). | ||
| 32 |
| To assess LUTS severity in men by IPSS and core lower urinary tract symptom score | A convenience sample, using questionnaires | All symptom scores were significantly increased in symptomatic men compared with controls. | A cross-sectional study of Japanese men. Need longitudinal studies of those with cultural background to confirm study findings | |
| 33 |
| To evaluate the LUTS impact on urinary-specific HRQOL, generic health indices, depression and anxiety | Cross-sectional population-representative survey | 35.9% of men meeting self-reported screening criteria for clinical anxiety and 29.8% of men for clinical depression. | Data are self-reported. Clinically significant anxiety and depression might not correspond to clinical diagnoses. | |
| 34 |
| To evaluate the relationship between LUTS and depression in men | Cross-sectional observational study, using questionnaire | Odds ratio (adjusted for total testosterone and age) for LUTS impact on mild depression is 1.092, | The measure of depression is a questionnaire, not a diagnostic tool. | |
| 35 |
| To evaluate outcomes of medical treatments of LUTS and the impact of LUTS on general HRQOL | Cross-sectional observational study | Approximately half of BPH patients medically treated report unsatisfactory outcomes. Moderate-to-severe LUTS impact general HRQOL significantly. | The sample might not be representative. | |
| 36 |
| To examine the impact of symptom severity on QOL in men with LUTS /BPH | A convenience sample, questionnaire survey | Severity of urinary incontinence was predictive of all QOL domains except general health, and sexual function was predictive of all QOL domains. | Possible self-report bias | |
| 37 |
| To investigate QOL in elderly men and correlates of LUTS | A case-control study | Moderate and severe LUTS significantly reduced QOL | Subject selection bias Possible inaccurate self-report of symptoms | |
| 38 |
| To evaluate association between LUTS and ED, EjD, and premature ejaculation | Cross-sectional epidemiological study survey | Men with multiple LUTS had more severe ED and more frequent EjD and premature ejaculation. Age, hypertension, diabetes, depression, urgency, and leaking during sexual activity were significantly associated with ED. | Results are observational and descriptive. Possible self-report bias | |
| 39 |
| To investigate the relationship between LUTS and sexual problems in aging men | Multinational survey | Sexual disorders and their bothersomeness were strongly related to both age and severity of LUTS. | The potential effect of selection bias cannot be completely ruled out. | |
| 40 |
| To evaluate if LUTS and ED were treated in an integrated fashion in primary care | A convenience sample, cross sectional | 54% of the patients with LUTS also admitted to ED. Patients with more severe LUTS had more severe ED. | Not discussed | |
| 41 |
| To assess the burden and unmet need from LUTS/BPH with focus on the United Kingdom | Systematic review | LUTS/BPH have a major impact on men, their families, health services, and society | This review did not assess the impact of pharmacotherapies on the burden of LUTS. | |
| 42 |
| To determine the effect of LUTS on utility of health care and health outcome | Secondary data analysis | LUTS were associated with more emergency room visits ( | Cannot verify accuracy of the reported data | |
| 43 |
| To examine QOL of partners of men with LUTS suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction | A convenience sample, cross-sectional study | Partners of men with LUTS/benign prostatic obstruction had poor QOL. | The partner sample is relatively small ( | |
| 44 |
| To assess the impact of urinary incontinence on the psychological burden of family caregivers | Online survey | Caregivers ( | This Internet-based survey may be limited by selection bias because subjects with higher education, income, social status, and so forth may be more likely to participate in such studies. | |
| 45 |
| Review health-care utilization and cost associated with BPH | Review study | N/A | In 2000, 4.5 million office visits made for BPH, and the estimated direct cost of BPH is $1.1 billion. | Administrative data lack detailed patient-level information. Data were available only through 2000. |
| 46 |
| Cost burden of urological diseases | Review article | N/A | The five most costly urological diseases, which account for $9.1 billion, were urinary tract infection ($3.5 billion), kidney stones ($2 billion), prostate cancer ($1.3 billion), bladder cancer ($1.2 billion), and BPH ($1.1 billion). | |
|
| ||||||
| 47 |
| To review pathophysiologic mechanisms for male LUTS | Systematic review | N/A | Reviewed several pathologic processes implicated in male LUTS. | The discussion might be limited by the search agent and keyword. |
| 48 |
| Update of the latest evidence on the mechanisms of action, evaluate the current meta-analyses, and emphasize the results of pooled data analyses of PDE5-Is in LUTS/BPE | Systematic review | PDE5-Is improves LUTS (IPSS mean difference vs. placebo: 2.35–4.21) and erectile function (IIEF mean difference vs. placebo: 2.25–5.66). | Data on the long-term effects prostate size, disease progression, or prostate cancer prevalence related to the use of PDE5-Is are not available. | |
| 49 |
| To review current medical treatment of LUTS | Systematic review | N/A | PDE5-I improves BPH/LUTS. Combination of PDE5-I with ABs provides better symptomatic control than ABs alone. | The results might be limited by the keyword search and the use of search agent. |
| 50 |
| To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of newer drugs used to treat LUTS | Systematic review | AB silodosin and PDE5-Is tadalafil were more effective than placebo in improving LUTS (moderate strength evidence), but these drugs had more adverse effects, including abnormal ejaculation (silodosin). | Evidence was insufficient to assess long-term efficacy, prevention of symptom progression, need for surgical intervention, or long-term adverse effects. | |
| 51 |
| To assess the effects of medical, herbal, and surgical treatments on LUTS | Systematic review | ABs improve symptoms compared with placebo. 5-ARIs improve symptoms and reduce the risk of complications of BPH. | Findings might be limited by the keyword search and the use of search agent. | |
| 52 |
| To assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of newer drugs on LUTS/BPH | Systematic review | 43 RCTs | For all newer agents, the evidence was generally insufficient to assess long-term efficacy, prevention of symptom progression, or adverse effects. | Focus on English language publications is a potential limitation. Unable to evaluate adverse treatment effect such as disease progression leading to AUR and/or surgical intervention. |
| 53 |
| To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirabegron treatment of storage symptom | Systematic review and meta-analysis | 8 trials evaluating 10,248 patients | Mirabegron 50 mg and 100 mg were associated with a significant reduction of nocturia episodes, compared with a placebo. | Despite the high quality of the included studies, most available data were from industry-led trials. |
| 54 |
| To evaluate the impact of medical treatments for LUTS/BPH on ejaculatory function (EjD) | Systematic review | EjD was significantly more common with ABs ( | EjD may be underreported in RCTs, where validated tools to assess ejaculatory function were not routinely used. The definition of EjD was often not reported and inconsistent among studies. | |
| 55 |
| To review the adverse side effects of 5-ARIs therapy | Review study | N/A | 5-ARIs have adverse effects such as reduced libido, ED, orgasmic dysfunction, increased high Gleason grade prostate cancer, heart failure, and cardiovascular events, depression | Adverse events may have been underestimated in clinical trials. |
| 56 |
| Informing that 5-ARI class of drugs has the increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer | In review of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial | The reduction in risk of prostate cancer was limited to Gleason score 6 or lower prostate cancers. However, there was an increased incidence of Gleason score 8–10 prostate cancers with finasteride versus placebo (1.8% vs. 1.1%, respectively). | ||
| 57 |
| To assess the provider perceptions of sexual dysfunction in men with LUTS/BPH and the effects of BPH treatments on sexual function | Large-scale epidemiology study; survey | 19% patients reported medication side effect to urologists and 24% to their PCP. The incidence of EjD due to medications was 32% estimated by urologists, 22% by PCP. | The sample size of urologists and PCP was small, not representative. | |
| 58 |
| To examine adherence to pharmacological therapy in men with LUTS | A cohort study use an administrative prescription database and hospital discharge code | The 1-year adherence was 29% in patients exposed to at least 6-month therapy. | The paucity of clinical measures and the absence of patient-reported outcomes. | |
| 59 |
| To assess influence of patient characteristics and provider factors on the continuation of medication for 12 months in newly diagnosed BPH patients | A cohort study and telephone surveys | 12-month compliance for medication was 36.6%. Independent predictors included larger prostate volume, higher PSA, income level, and a good patient–doctor relationship. | Findings were mainly based on a retrospective review. Data were obtained through self-reporting or prescription records and not independently audited by pill counts or otherwise validated. | |
| 60 |
| To evaluate treatment failure during a 4-year follow-up period | A convenience sample, longitudinal observation | Treatment failure occurred in 42 (17.0%) patients during the 4-year period. | Subject dropout may affect the accuracy of the estimate of the treatment failure rate. | |
| 61 |
| To review the medical and minimally invasive treatments for managing BPH | Systematic review | N/A | Several minimally invasive techniques have showed promising results comparable with that of transurethral resection of the prostate. | The results might be limited by the keyword search and the use of search agent. |
| 62 |
| To review the mechanism of action, the type of neuromodulation, and the efficacy of neuromodulation in RCTs | Systematic review | N/A | Neuromodulation therapies (pelvic floor electrical stimulation, interferential therapy, magnetic stimulation, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, and sacral nerve stimulation) were effective on treating overactive bladder or urgency urinary incontinence. | The respective cure or improvements are difficult to compare because neuromodulation was selected on occasion of lack of response to other conservative treatments. |
| 63 |
| To assess the potential additional benefit of nonstandard vs. standard surgical treatments for BPH | Systematic review | 43 mainly low-quality RCTs involving 4,539 patients | Nonstandard procedure was not superior for symptom reduction. Holmium or thulium laser resections of the prostate may have additional benefits. | Data quality is poor; studies lack scientific rigor. There is a paucity of data on long-term outcomes. |
| 64 |
| To evaluate the cost-utility of Microwave thermotherapy | Health-economic simulation model | ProstaLund Feedback Treatment appears to be cost-saving after 5 years. | Lacking long-run data in this area, especially data from RCTs | |
|
| ||||||
| 65 |
| To compare the effectiveness of behavioral treatment with that of antimuscarinic therapy in men with overactive bladder | Randomized, controlled, equivalence trial with 4-week AB run-in | The behavioral group showed greater reductions in nocturia (mean = −0.70 vs. −0.32 episodes/ night; | The results may be generalized only to men without evidence of obstruction as determined by uroflowmetry, PVR, and a trial of an AB. Not all possible drug combinations were tested. | |
| 66 |
| To assess the effect of an SMP on actual voiding behavior using frequency-volume chart data | RCT | The total number of voids and episodes of nocturia were lower in the SMP group, with a mean decrease of 2.6 and 0.7 episodes, respectively than in standard care group. | Potential differential impact of medication on study groups was not controlled. | |
| 67 |
| Self-management for men with LUTS | Methodology article explaining a behavioral intervention | N/A | Self-management significantly reduced urinary symptoms (as effective as medication), suggesting that self-management be considered as first-line treatment for men with LUTS. | Described the SMP and study outcome but provided a few details of the RCT |
| 68 |
| To evaluate the self-management interventions in improving LUTS/BPH and QOL in men | RCT | IPSS scores and QOL self-management interventional group scores were significantly lower than those of the standard care group at 3 and 6 months. | Subject self-selection bias Repeated measure analysis of variance was used to examine associations among study groups and measures; a lack an objective measure. | |
| 69 |
| To evaluate the effect of community-based nurse-led interventions on Chinese patients with LUTS | Case-controlled intervention study | The intervention group reported increased self-efficacy, improved global health condition, doctor consultation, use of medication, and nondrug therapy. | Absence of randomization and potential recall bias | |
| 70 |
| To test the efficacy of lifestyle measures as a first step in treating nocturia | A convenience sample, repeated measures | Mean nocturnal voids and nocturnal urine volume decreased significantly from 3.6 to 2.7 and from 923 to 768 ml, respectively. Twenty-six subjects (53.1%) showed an improvement of more than one episode. | Absence of a control group Did not collect data on how much patients had incorporated the behavioral recommendations. | |
| 71 |
| To assess the effect of pelvic floor muscle exercises on overactive bladder symptoms | Nonrandomized, controlled trial | At pelvic floor muscle contraction, while the bladder was filled to the volume inducing involuntary voiding, the detrusor pressure decreased to a mean of 10.6 ± 2.1 cm H2O (range 6–12, | Not discussed | |
| 72 |
| To analyze the influence of body position on urodynamic parameters | Systematic search was conducted on 14 medical databases | In men with LUTS, a significantly lower PVR (224.96 ml; 95% CI 248.70 to 21.23) was shown in sitting position compared with standing. | The results might be limited by the keyword search and the use of search agent. | |
| 73 |
| To determine the association between LUTS severity and physical activity (PA) | Questionnaires | The inverse association between PA energy expenditure LUTS severity was most evident among obese men (i.e., BMI > 30). | The causal relationship between PA and LUTS could not be determined. | |
| 74 |
| To examine the association of PA with nocturia in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial | Clinical trial | Prevalent ( | Men being active more than an hour per week were 13% less likely to report nocturia and 34% less likely to report severe nocturia than men reporting no PA. | There may be an overreporting of PA due to the study question asked. |
| 75 |
| To compare effects of a meal-replacement-based diet with isocaloric reduced-fat plan on LUTS and nutrient intake in obese Asian men | Randomized trial | The meal-replacement group had significantly greater decreases in waist circumference, fat mass, fat intake, plasma C-reactive protein, and in storage LUTS score. | The small sample size and lower statistic power. | |
| 76 |
| To assess the effect of weight reduction on LUTS) and the relationship between obesity and LUTS | RCT | There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups on nocturia, LUTS severity, QOL, and uroflowmetry parameters. | Most patients were overweight (BMI 25 to < 30 kg/m2), not obese (BMI 30–35 kg/m2), likely masking intervention effect. | |
| 77 |
| To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) powder | Controlled trial | The cranberry group had statistically significant improvement in IPSS, QOL, and urination parameters. | A small sample size and inadequate consideration of the placebo effect. | |
| 78 |
| To evaluate the prophylactic effects of cranberry extract in men with LUTS/BPH) | Controlled trial | The cranberry oral supplementation was superior at reducing the mean number of urinary tract infections ( | Small sample; bivariate statistics were used, did not control for covariates. | |
| 79 |
| To assess the effect of a standardized grape product on urinary symptoms | RCT | There was no statistical difference between taking grape juice and placebo. | Dose of grape juice may be inadequate. Subject self-selection bias. | |
| 80 |
| To examine association between beverage intake and LUTS in the Boston Area Community | Prospective cohort study | Citrus juice intake was associated with 50% lower odds of LUTS progression in men ( | Possible nonresponse bias | |
| 81 |
| To evaluate the association of vitamin D levels and LUTS among U.S. men | Cross-sectional survey | Vitamin D deficiency was associated with the presence of moderate-severe urinary incontinence (POR 1.8) and at least one LUTS (POR 1.4). | Vitamin D level or LUTS data were missing for 42% of the sample that were largely young and White. | |
| 82 |
| To highlight the benefits of nutrition and dietary supplements in men with LUTS/BPH | Review study | N/A | Discussed Vitamin D deficiency as a risk factor for BPH | |
| 83 |
| To provide the most relevant data on the correlation between vitamin D and BPH | A comprehensive review | N/A | Vitamin D analogues of up to 6,000 IU/day have shown to decrease prostate volume in BPH patients. | Not discussed |
| 84 |
| To test if carotenoid, vitamin A, and vitamin C intake were inversely associated with LUTS, voiding, and storage symptoms | Survey using a multistage random sample design | Men consuming greater dietary lycopene, b-carotene, total carotenoid, or vitamin A had 40% to 50% reduced odds of LUTS. | Possible nonresponse bias | |
| 85 |
| To assess the effects of | Systematic review | Nine new trials | For nocturia, | A small number of studies existed and were reviewed. |
| 86 |
| To assess the effects of | Systematic review | Three new trials | Compared with finasteride, | A small number of studies were reviewed. |
| 87 |
| To determine the efficacy of saw palmetto for the treatment of BPH | Randomized double-blind trial | There was no significant difference between the saw palmetto and placebo groups. | A number of methodologic limitations including a failure to use validated symptom scores, and inadequate concealment of treatment assignment in 10 of the 21 studies | |
| 88 |
| To determine the effect of saw palmetto extract at up to 3 times the standard dose on LUTS/BPH | Double-blind, multicenter RCT | Saw palmetto extract was no more effective than placebo for any secondary outcome. | Only one extract was studied, and because the potential active ingredients and mechanisms are unknown, the findings may not be generalizable. | |
| 89 |
| To examine the effect of | Systematic review | 32 RCTs involving 5,666 men | Compared with placebo, | Not discussed |
| 90 |
| To analyze evidence on the role of Cucurbita pepo in the treatment of LUTS/BPH | Systematic search | In all studies an improvement IPSS and uroflowmetry parameters has been reported. In four studies, an improvement in QOL has been reported. | The few available studies were often outdated and enrolled a small number of patients, and only three RCTs were of good quality. | |
| 91 |
| To assess the therapeutic and adverse effects of acupuncture | Systematic review and meta-analysis | 8 RCTs, involving 661 men with BPH | Data from three trials showed a short-term effect of acupuncture when compared with sham acupuncture. A meta-analysis indicated no significant effect on IPSS in two trials. | Although two trials were published in English, the populations in the included trials were all Chinese. Most included trials (7/8) had follow-up periods no longer than 3 months. |
| 92 |
| To evaluate whether reflexotherapy can treat the irritative symptom of LUTS | Randomized controlled study | The daily voiding frequency decreased by 8% in those receiving a drug and by 20% in those ( | Small sample size | |
| 93 |
| To evaluate effects of electroacupuncture on LUTS severity (IPSS), PVR, and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) | Randomized controlled study | At the 6th week, treatment group had a 4.51 and 4.12 points greater decline in IPSS than the control group. At the 18th week, a 3.2 points ( | Study treatment was 4 weeks and followed up till the 18th week. Long-term effects regimen to be established. | |
Note. LUTS = lower urinary tract symptoms; EPIC = European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; IPSS = international prostate symptom score; EpiLUTS = Epidemiology of LUTS; MrOS = Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study; ED = erectile dysfunction; PCP = primary care providers; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; BPH = benign prostatic hyperplasia; RCT = randomized controlled trial; PCPT = Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial; QOL = quality of life; HRQoL = health-related quality of life; EjD = ejaculatory dysfunction; PDE5-Is = phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; IIEF = International Index of Erectile Function; AUR = acute urinary retention; ABs = alpha blocker; 5-ARI = 5-alpha reductase inhibitor; PVR = postvoid residual urine; SMP = self-management program; POR = prevalence odds ratio; BMI = body mass index.
Bold fonts indicate the article that was included in another area for review.