Literature DB >> 33415073

Comparison of Overall Survival Between Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma and Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study Based on SEER Database.

Ciqiu Yang1, Chuqian Lei1,2, Yi Zhang1, Junsheng Zhang1, Fei Ji1, Weijun Pan1, Liulu Zhang1, Hongfei Gao1, Mei Yang1, Jieqing Li1, Kun Wang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) account for most breast cancers. However, the overall survival (OS) differences between ILC and IDC remain controversial. This study aimed to compare nonmetastatic ILC to IDC in terms of survival and prognostic factors for ILC.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Cancer Database (www.seer.cancer.gov). Women diagnosed with nonmetastatic ILC and IDC between 2006 and 2016 were included. A propensity score matching (PSM) method was used in our analysis to reduce baseline differences in clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used for survival analysis.
RESULTS: Compared to IDC patients, ILC patients were diagnosed later in life with poorly differentiated and larger lesions, as well as increased expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) and/or progesterone receptors (PRs). A lower rate of radiation therapy and chemotherapy was observed in ILC. After PSM, ILC, and IDC patients exhibited similar OS (HR=1.017, p=0.409, 95% CI: 0.967-1.069). In subgroup analysis of HR-negative, AJCC stage III, N2/N3 stage patients, or those who received radiotherapy, ILC patients exhibited worse OS compared to IDC patients. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed a 47% survival benefit for IDC compared to ILC in HR-negative patients who received chemotherapy (HR=1.47, p=0.01, 95% CI: 1.09-1.97).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that ILC and IDC patients had similar OS after PSM. However, ILC patients with high risk indicators had worse OS compared to IDC patients by subgroup analysis.
Copyright © 2020 Yang, Lei, Zhang, Zhang, Ji, Pan, Zhang, Gao, Yang, Li and Wang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER program; breast cancer; invasive ductal carcinoma; invasive lobular carcinoma; overall survival

Year:  2020        PMID: 33415073      PMCID: PMC7783385          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.590643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  42 in total

Review 1.  Pathologic complete response as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-regression of 29 randomized prospective studies.

Authors:  Alfredo Berruti; Vito Amoroso; Fabio Gallo; Valentina Bertaglia; Edda Simoncini; Rebecca Pedersini; Laura Ferrari; Alberto Bottini; Paolo Bruzzi; Maria Pia Sormani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Invasive lobular breast cancer and its variants: how special are they for systemic therapy decisions?

Authors:  Séverine Guiu; Anita Wolfer; William Jacot; Pierre Fumoleau; Gilles Romieu; Franck Bonnetain; Maryse Fiche
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 3.  Differences between invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: results and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Romualdo Barroso-Sousa; Otto Metzger-Filho
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 4.  Lobular Breast Cancer: Different Disease, Different Algorithms?

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Tari A King
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.495

5.  A clinical and histopathologic analysis of the results of conservation surgery and radiation therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma.

Authors:  T P Mate; D Carter; D B Fischer; P V Hartman; C McKhann; M Merino; L R Prosnitz; J B Weissberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Lobular breast carcinoma and its variants.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lobular and ductal breast carcinomas: a retrospective study on 860 patients from one institution.

Authors:  M Tubiana-Hulin; D Stevens; S Lasry; J M Guinebretière; L Bouita; C Cohen-Solal; P Cherel; J Rouëssé
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Is invasive lobular carcinoma different from invasive ductal carcinoma?

Authors:  H Mersin; E Yildirim; K Gülben; U Berberoğlu
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Lobular histology and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Esther H Lips; Rita A Mukhtar; Christina Yau; Jorma J de Ronde; Chad Livasy; Lisa A Carey; Claudette E Loo; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken-Peeters; Gabe S Sonke; Donald A Berry; Laura J Van't Veer; Laura J Esserman; Jelle Wesseling; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Grazia Arpino; Valerie J Bardou; Gary M Clark; Richard M Elledge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Invasive lobular carcinoma: an understudied emergent subtype of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason A Mouabbi; Amy Hassan; Bora Lim; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Debasish Tripathy; Rachel M Layman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology: II. Primary Thoracic and Breast Malignancies.

Authors:  Matthew F Covington; Bhasker R Koppula; Gabriel C Fine; Ahmed Ebada Salem; Richard H Wiggins; John M Hoffman; Kathryn A Morton
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Adherence to a western dietary pattern and risk of invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinomas: a case-control study.

Authors:  Elahe Foroozani; Mostafa Dianatinasab; Ali Akbari; Sasan Amanat; Nastaran Rashidi; Dariush Bastam; Shima Ataee; Golnaz Sharifnia; Mohammad Faraouei; Hassan Safdari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Nontherapeutic Risk Factors of Different Grouped Stage IIIC Breast Cancer Patients' Mortality: A Study of the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.

Authors:  Yue Qiu; Hongye Chen; Yongjing Dai; Baoshi Bao; Lin Tian; Yuhui Chen
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.269

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.