Literature DB >> 33414390

Knockout serotonin transporter in rats moderates outcome and stimulus generalization.

Chao Ciu-Gwok Guo1, Tao He2, Joanes Grandjean3,4, Judith Homberg5.   

Abstract

Understanding the common dimension of mental disorders (such as anxiety, depression, and drug addiction) might contribute to the construction of biological frameworks (Research Domain Criteria, RDoC) for novel ways of treatment. One common dimension at the behavioral level observed across these disorders is a generalization. Testing generalization in serotonin transporter (5-HTT) knockout (KO) rats, an animal model showing depression/anxiety-like behaviors and drug addiction-like behaviors, could therefore provide more insights into this framework. We tested the outcome and stimulus generalization in wild-type (WT) and 5-HTT KO rats. Using a newly established touchscreen-based task, subjects directly responded to visual stimuli (Gabor patch images). We measured the response time and outcome in a precise manner. We found that 5-HTT KO rats processed visual information faster than WT rats during outcome generalization. Interestingly, during stimulus generalization, WT rats gradually responded faster to the stimuli as the sessions progressed, while 5-HTT KO rats responded faster than WT in the initial sessions and did not change significantly as the sessions progressed. This observation suggests that KO rats, compared to WT rats, may be less able to update changes in information. Taken together, KO 5-HTT modulates information processing when the environment changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33414390      PMCID: PMC7791109          DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-01162-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Psychiatry        ISSN: 2158-3188            Impact factor:   7.989


  61 in total

1.  Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.

Authors:  Thomas Insel; Bruce Cuthbert; Marjorie Garvey; Robert Heinssen; Daniel S Pine; Kevin Quinn; Charles Sanislow; Philip Wang
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Medicine. Brain disorders? Precisely.

Authors:  Thomas R Insel; Bruce N Cuthbert
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Moving beyond P values: data analysis with estimation graphics.

Authors:  Joses Ho; Tayfun Tumkaya; Sameer Aryal; Hyungwon Choi; Adam Claridge-Chang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Reduced cocaine-induced serotonin, but not dopamine and noradrenaline, release in rats with a genetic deletion of serotonin transporters.

Authors:  Michel M M Verheij; Peter Karel; Alexander R Cools; Judith R Homberg
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.600

5.  Median and Dorsal Raphe Serotonergic Neurons Control Moderate Versus Compulsive Cocaine Intake.

Authors:  Michel M M Verheij; Candice Contet; Peter Karel; Judith Latour; Rick H A van der Doelen; Bram Geenen; Josephus A van Hulten; Francisca Meyer; Tamas Kozicz; Olivier George; George F Koob; Judith R Homberg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Adaptations in pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor function and cocaine supersensitivity in serotonin transporter knockout rats.

Authors:  Judith R Homberg; Sietse F De Boer; Halfdan S Raasø; Jocelien D A Olivier; Mark Verheul; Eric Ronken; Alexander R Cools; Bart A Ellenbroek; Anton N M Schoffelmeer; Louk J M J Vanderschuren; Taco J De Vries; Edwin Cuppen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Reaction time responding in rats.

Authors:  A Blokland
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  Individual differences in cocaine addiction: maladaptive behavioural traits.

Authors:  Judith R Homberg; Peter Karel; Michel M M Verheij
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 9.  Making Decisions under Ambiguity: Judgment Bias Tasks for Assessing Emotional State in Animals.

Authors:  Sanne Roelofs; Hetty Boleij; Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Cognitive Bias Under Adverse and Rewarding Conditions: A Systematic Review of Rodent Studies.

Authors:  Ho A T Nguyen; Chao Guo; Judith R Homberg
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.