| Literature DB >> 33414374 |
Marc-Andrea Baertsch1, Elias K Mai1, Thomas Hielscher2, Uta Bertsch1,3, Hans J Salwender4, Markus Munder5, Stephan Fuhrmann6, Ulrich Dührsen7, Peter Brossart8, Kai Neben9, Jana Schlenzka1,3, Christina Kunz2,10, Marc S Raab1, Jens Hillengaß1,11, Anna Jauch12, Anja Seckinger1, Dirk Hose1,13, Steffen Luntz14, Pieter Sonneveld15, Henk Lokhorst16, Hans Martin17, Martin Goerner18, Martin Hoffmann19, Hans-Walter Lindemann20, Helga Bernhard21, Igor W Blau22, Christof Scheid23, Britta Besemer24, Katja C Weisel25, Mathias Hänel26, Jan Dürig7, Hartmut Goldschmidt27,28.
Abstract
Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance (MT) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard of care in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) but has not been compared to other agents in clinical trials. We retrospectively compared bortezomib (BTZ; n = 138) or LEN (n = 183) MT from two subsequent GMMG phase III trials. All patients received three cycles of BTZ-based triplet induction and post-ASCT MT. BTZ MT (1.3 mg/m2 i.v.) was administered every 2 weeks for 2 years. LEN MT included two consolidation cycles (25 mg p.o., days 1-21 of 28 day cycles) followed by 10-15 mg/day for 2 years. The BTZ cohort more frequently received tandem ASCT (91% vs. 33%) due to different tandem ASCT strategies. In the LEN and BTZ cohort, 43% and 46% of patients completed 2 years of MT as intended (p = 0.57). Progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.83, p = 0.18) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.70, p = 0.15) did not differ significantly with LEN vs. BTZ MT. Patients with <nCR after first ASCT were assigned tandem ASCT in both trials. In patients with <nCR and tandem ASCT (LEN: n = 54 vs. BTZ: n = 84), LEN MT significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.61, p = 0.04) but not OS (HR = 0.46, p = 0.09). In conclusion, the significant PFS benefit after eliminating the impact of different tandem ASCT rates supports the current standard of LEN MT after ASCT.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33414374 PMCID: PMC7791127 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-020-00390-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Cancer J ISSN: 2044-5385 Impact factor: 11.037