Serpil Ozdemir1, Dercan Gencbas2, Betul Tosun3, Hatice Bebis4, Ozlem Sinan5. 1. Department of Public Health Nursing, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: serpilozdemir327@gmail.com. 2. Department of Nursing, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Department of Nursing, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey. 4. Public Health Nursing Department, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus. 5. Department of Public Health Nursing, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate musculoskeletal pain due to mechanical reasons and related risk factors in adolescents and to define posture profiles of adolescents. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study was conducted with 2221 adolescents between February 2015 and May 2015. The questionnaire used to collect data consisted of three parts: (1) descriptive characteristics of the participants, (2) pain assessment of 14 parts of the body, and (3) Back Pain and Body Posture Evaluation Instrument (BackPEI). RESULTS: The prevalence of low back pain among the participants was 73.3% (n = 1,343), while the prevalence of back pain was 68.4% (n = 1,254). The participants attributed their pain to their poor sitting postures at school (38.1%, n = 847) and carrying school backpacks (84.1%, n = 1,713). There was a statistically significant difference in the physical activities of adolescents and the BackPEI score (z = 4.40; p = .001). Posture factors of the BackPEI score increased while school desk comfort score increased (Spearman's rho = 0.148; p = .001), but it decreased while the school grades of the adolescents increased (Spearman's rho [ρ] = -0.161; p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, body posture was related to musculoskeletal pain and was correlated with physical activities, school desk comfort, and school grades of the adolescents. It is suggested that correct posture and ergonomic positions should be taught to adolescents when using computers, carrying school backpacks, and sitting in school chairs to prevent musculoskeletal pain.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate musculoskeletal pain due to mechanical reasons and related risk factors in adolescents and to define posture profiles of adolescents. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study was conducted with 2221 adolescents between February 2015 and May 2015. The questionnaire used to collect data consisted of three parts: (1) descriptive characteristics of the participants, (2) pain assessment of 14 parts of the body, and (3) Back Pain and Body Posture Evaluation Instrument (BackPEI). RESULTS: The prevalence of low back pain among the participants was 73.3% (n = 1,343), while the prevalence of back pain was 68.4% (n = 1,254). The participants attributed their pain to their poor sitting postures at school (38.1%, n = 847) and carrying school backpacks (84.1%, n = 1,713). There was a statistically significant difference in the physical activities of adolescents and the BackPEI score (z = 4.40; p = .001). Posture factors of the BackPEI score increased while school desk comfort score increased (Spearman's rho = 0.148; p = .001), but it decreased while the school grades of the adolescents increased (Spearman's rho [ρ] = -0.161; p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, body posture was related to musculoskeletal pain and was correlated with physical activities, school desk comfort, and school grades of the adolescents. It is suggested that correct posture and ergonomic positions should be taught to adolescents when using computers, carrying school backpacks, and sitting in school chairs to prevent musculoskeletal pain.
Authors: Bruna Nichele da Rosa; Cláudia Tarragô Candotti; Luiza Rampi Pivotto; Matias Noll; Marcelle Guimarães Silva; Adriane Vieira; Jefferson Fagundes Loss Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bruna Nichele da Rosa; Matias Noll; Cláudia Tarragô Candotti; Jefferson Fagundes Loss Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 4.614