Literature DB >> 33413489

Designing provider-focused implementation trials with purpose and intent: introducing the PRECIS-2-PS tool.

Wynne E Norton1, Kirsty Loudon2, David A Chambers3, Merrick Zwarenstein4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch (1967), randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can be conceptualized along a continuum from more explanatory to more pragmatic. The purpose and intent of the former is to test interventions under ideal contexts, and the purpose and intent of the latter is to test interventions in real-world contexts. The PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 (PRECIS-2) is a validated tool that helps researchers make decisions about the elements of the trial to match the overall purpose and intent of the trial along the continuum. The PRECIS-2 tool has guided the design of hundreds of RCTs. However, a few aspects of the tool would benefit from greater clarity, including its application to provider-focused implementation trials rather than patient-focused intervention trials. MAIN TEXT: We describe the newly developed PRECIS-2-Provider Strategies (PRECIS-2-PS) tool, an extension of the PRECIS-2 tool, which has been adapted for trials testing provider-focused strategies. We elaborate on nine domains that can make a provider-focused trial more explanatory or more pragmatic, including eligibility, recruitment, setting, implementation resources, flexibility of provider strategies, flexibility of intervention, data collection, primary outcome, and primary analysis. We detail the complementary roles that researchers and stakeholders play in the trial design phase, with implications for generalizability of trial results to the contexts in which they are intended to be applied.
CONCLUSIONS: The PRECIS-2-PS tool is designed to help research and practice teams plan for provider-focused trials that reflect the overall intent and purpose of the trial. The tool has potential to help advance the science of provider-focused strategies across a range of trials, with the ultimate goal of facilitating the adoption, integration, and sustainability of provider-focused strategies outside the context of trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Explanatory trials; Healthcare delivery research; Implementation science; Implementation strategies; Multi-level trials; PRECIS; Pragmatic trials; Randomized controlled trials

Year:  2021        PMID: 33413489      PMCID: PMC7791810          DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01075-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implement Sci        ISSN: 1748-5908            Impact factor:   7.327


  25 in total

1.  Misrepresenting "Usual Care" in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error.

Authors:  Ruth Macklin; Charles Natanson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  The importance of decision intent within descriptions of pragmatic trials.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Merrick Zwarenstein; Spencer Phillips Hey; Bruno Giraudeau; Marion K Campbell; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies.

Authors:  Byron J Powell; Rinad S Beidas; Cara C Lewis; Gregory A Aarons; J Curtis McMillen; Enola K Proctor; David S Mandell
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Intention-to-treat concept: A review.

Authors:  Sandeep K Gupta
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2011-07

5.  Informing real-world practice with real-world evidence: the value of PRECIS-2.

Authors:  Gila Neta; Karin E Johnson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda.

Authors:  Byron J Powell; Maria E Fernandez; Nathaniel J Williams; Gregory A Aarons; Rinad S Beidas; Cara C Lewis; Sheena M McHugh; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2019-01-22

7.  The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Kelly Carroll; Merrick Zwarenstein; Jamie C Brehaut; Charles Weijer; Spencer P Hey; Cory E Goldstein; Ian D Graham; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Joanne E McKenzie; Dean A Fergusson; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Use of PRECIS ratings in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory.

Authors:  Karin E Johnson; Gila Neta; Laura M Dember; Gloria D Coronado; Jerry Suls; David A Chambers; Sean Rundell; David H Smith; Benmei Liu; Stephen Taplin; Catherine M Stoney; Margaret M Farrell; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials.

Authors:  Tolulope T Sajobi; Guowei Li; Oluwagbohunmi Awosoga; Meng Wang; Bijoy K Menon; Michael D Hill; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-25
View more
  10 in total

1.  Healthy for Two/Healthy for You: Design and methods for a pragmatic randomized clinical trial to limit gestational weight gain and prevent obesity in the prenatal care setting.

Authors:  Wendy L Bennett; Janelle W Coughlin; Janice Henderson; Stephen Martin; Golsa M Yazdy; Emmanuel F Drabo; Nakiya N Showell; Christine McKinney; Lindsay Martin; Arlene Dalcin; Rachel Sanders; Nae-Yuh Wang
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  How Dissemination and Implementation Science Can Contribute to the Advancement of Learning Health Systems.

Authors:  Katy E Trinkley; P Michael Ho; Russell E Glasgow; Amy G Huebschmann
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 7.840

3.  The yin and yang of pragmatic clinical trials of behavioral interventions for chronic pain: balancing design features to maximize impact.

Authors:  Francis J Keefe; Mark P Jensen; Amanda C de C Williams; Steven Z George
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  DeImplementing Ineffective and Low-Value Clinical Practices: Research and Practice Opportunities in Community Oncology Settings.

Authors:  Wynne E Norton; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; David A Chambers; Philip J Stella; Otis W Brawley; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-02-24

5.  The importance of methodology to palliative care research: A new article type for Palliative Medicine.

Authors:  Jenny T van der Steen; Melissa J Bloomer; Sandra Martins Pereira
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Protocol refinement for a diabetes pragmatic trial using the PRECIS-2 framework.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Dennis Gurfinkel; Jeanette Waxmonsky; Jenny Rementer; Natalie D Ritchie; Jennifer Dailey-Vail; Patrick Hosokawa; L Miriam Dickinson; Bethany M Kwan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Acceptability and feasibility of conducting a pilot trial in Irish primary care: lessons from the IDEAs study.

Authors:  Fiona Riordan; Katie Murphy; Colin Bradley; Patricia M Kearney; Susan M Smith; Sheena M McHugh
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2021-07-14

8.  Revisiting concepts of evidence in implementation science.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Rachel C Shelton; Elvin H Geng; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 7.960

9.  Adapting and Developing an Academic and Community Practice Collaborative Care Model for Metastatic Breast Cancer Care (Project ADAPT): Protocol for an Implementation Science-Based Study.

Authors:  Ashley J Housten; Uzoma Charles Okere; Graham A Colditz; Cynthia Ma; Jingxia Liu; Courtney Harriss; Nancy U Lin; Melissa Rooney; Jennifer Dill; Muhammad Popalzai; Jennifer Badiu; Kan Huang; Casey Burton; Lindsay Peterson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-07-25

10.  Required sample size to detect mediation in 3-level implementation studies.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Williams; Kristopher J Preacher; Paul D Allison; David S Mandell; Steven C Marcus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 7.960

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.