Literature DB >> 33413454

Protocol: mixed-methods study of how implementation of US state medical cannabis laws affects treatment of chronic non-cancer pain and adverse opioid outcomes.

Emma E McGinty1, Kayla N Tormohlen2, Colleen L Barry2, Mark C Bicket3, Lainie Rutkow2, Elizabeth A Stuart2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thirty-three US states and Washington, D.C., have enacted medical cannabis laws allowing patients with chronic non-cancer pain to use cannabis, when recommended by a physician, to manage their condition. However, clinical guidelines do not recommend cannabis for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain due to limited and mixed evidence of effectiveness. How state medical cannabis laws affect delivery of evidence-based treatment for chronic non-cancer pain is unclear. These laws could lead to substitution of cannabis in place of clinical guideline-discordant opioid prescribing, reducing risk of opioid use disorder and overdose. Conversely, state medical cannabis laws could lead to substitution of cannabis in place of guideline-concordant treatments such as topical analgesics or physical therapy. This protocol describes a mixed-methods study examining the implementation and effects of state medical cannabis laws on treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. A key contribution of the study is the examination of how variation in state medical cannabis laws' policy implementation rules affects receipt of chronic non-cancer pain treatments.
METHODS: The study uses a concurrent-embedded design. The primary quantitative component of the study employs a difference-in-differences design using a policy trial emulation approach. Quantitative analyses will evaluate state medical cannabis laws' effects on treatment for chronic non-cancer pain as well as on receipt of treatment for opioid use disorder, opioid overdose, cannabis use disorder, and cannabis poisoning among people with chronic non-cancer pain. Secondary qualitative and survey methods will be used to characterize implementation of state medical cannabis laws through interviews with state leaders and representative surveys of physicians who treat, and patients who experience, chronic non-cancer pain in states with medical cannabis laws. DISCUSSION: This study will examine the effects of medical cannabis laws on patients' receipt of guideline-concordant non-opioid, non-cannabis treatments for chronic non-cancer pain and generate new evidence on the effects of state medical cannabis laws on adverse opioid outcomes. Results will inform the dynamic policy environment in which numerous states consider, enact, and/or amend medical cannabis laws each year.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cannabis; Law; Mixed-methods; Policy implementation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33413454      PMCID: PMC7789408          DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01071-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implement Sci        ISSN: 1748-5908            Impact factor:   7.327


  44 in total

1.  Do medical marijuana laws reduce addictions and deaths related to pain killers?

Authors:  David Powell; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Mireille Jacobson
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Opioid Abuse in Chronic Pain--Misconceptions and Mitigation Strategies.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; A Thomas McLellan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Mapping medical marijuana: state laws regulating patients, product safety, supply chains and dispensaries, 2017.

Authors:  Sarah B Klieger; Abraham Gutman; Leslie Allen; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Jennifer K Ibrahim; Scott Burris
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  A sequential stratification method for estimating the effect of a time-dependent experimental treatment in observational studies.

Authors:  Douglas E Schaubel; Robert A Wolfe; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Words Can Be Deceiving: A Review of Variation Among Legally Effective Medical Marijuana Laws in the United States.

Authors:  Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Priscillia Hunt; Anne Boustead
Journal:  J Drug Policy Anal       Date:  2014-12

6.  Improving the use of evidence in public health policy development, enactment and implementation: a multiple-case study.

Authors:  Emma E McGinty; Sameer Siddiqi; Sarah Linden; Joshua Horwitz; Shannon Frattaroli
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2019-04-01

7.  Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs Are Associated With Sustained Reductions In Opioid Prescribing By Physicians.

Authors:  Yuhua Bao; Yijun Pan; Aryn Taylor; Sharmini Radakrishnan; Feijun Luo; Harold Alan Pincus; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices.

Authors:  Carol Bennett; Sara Khangura; Jamie C Brehaut; Ian D Graham; David Moher; Beth K Potter; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Andrew D Oxman; Ray Moynihan; Elizabeth J Paulsen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Bridie Angela Evans; Helen Snooks; Helen Howson; Myfanwy Davies
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.