Andrew W Kam1,2,3,4, Scott Collins2, Tae Park1,2, Michael Mihail1,2, Fiona F Stanaway5, Noni L Lewis1,2,3, Daniel Polya1,2, Samantha Fraser-Bell1,2,3, Timothy V Roberts1,2,3, James E H Smith6,7,8,9,10. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia. 5. Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia. drjehsmith@gmail.com. 7. Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia. drjehsmith@gmail.com. 8. Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. drjehsmith@gmail.com. 9. Department of Ophthalmology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia. drjehsmith@gmail.com. 10. Department of Ophthalmology, Macquarie University Hospital, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia. drjehsmith@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing patient numbers, complexity of patient management, and healthcare resource limitations have resulted in prolonged patient wait times, decreased quality of service, and decreased patient satisfaction in many outpatient services worldwide. This study investigated the impact of Lean Six Sigma, a service improvement methodology originally from manufacturing, in reducing patient wait times and increasing service capacity in a publicly-funded, tertiary referral outpatient ophthalmology clinic. METHODS: This quality improvement study compared results from two five-months audits of operational data pre- and post-implementation of Lean Six Sigma. A baseline audit was conducted to determine duration and variability of patient in-clinic time and number of patients seen per clinic session. Staff interviews and a time-in-motion study were conducted to identify issues reducing clinic service efficiency. Solutions were developed to address these root causes including: clinic schedule amendments, creation of dedicated postoperative clinics, and clear documentation templates. A post-implementation audit was conducted, and the results compared with baseline audit data. Significant differences in patient in-clinic time pre- and post-solution implementation were assessed using Mann-Whitney test. Differences in variability of patient in-clinic times were assessed using Brown-Forsythe test. Differences in numbers of patients seen per clinic session were assessed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: During the baseline audit period, 19.4 patients were seen per 240-minute clinic session. Median patient in-clinic time was 131 minutes with an interquartile range of 133 minutes (84-217 minutes, quartile 1- quartile 3). Targeted low/negligible cost solutions were implemented to reduce in-clinic times. During the post-implementation audit period, the number of patients seen per session increased 9% to 21.1 (p = 0.016). There was significant reduction in duration (p < 0.001) and variability (p < 0.001) of patient in-clinic time (median 107 minutes, interquartile range 91 minutes [71-162 minutes]). CONCLUSIONS: Lean Six Sigma techniques may be used to reduce duration and variability of patient in-clinic time and increase service capacity in outpatient ophthalmology clinics without additional resource input.
BACKGROUND: Increasing patient numbers, complexity of patient management, and healthcare resource limitations have resulted in prolonged patient wait times, decreased quality of service, and decreased patient satisfaction in many outpatient services worldwide. This study investigated the impact of Lean Six Sigma, a service improvement methodology originally from manufacturing, in reducing patient wait times and increasing service capacity in a publicly-funded, tertiary referral outpatient ophthalmology clinic. METHODS: This quality improvement study compared results from two five-months audits of operational data pre- and post-implementation of Lean Six Sigma. A baseline audit was conducted to determine duration and variability of patient in-clinic time and number of patients seen per clinic session. Staff interviews and a time-in-motion study were conducted to identify issues reducing clinic service efficiency. Solutions were developed to address these root causes including: clinic schedule amendments, creation of dedicated postoperative clinics, and clear documentation templates. A post-implementation audit was conducted, and the results compared with baseline audit data. Significant differences in patient in-clinic time pre- and post-solution implementation were assessed using Mann-Whitney test. Differences in variability of patient in-clinic times were assessed using Brown-Forsythe test. Differences in numbers of patients seen per clinic session were assessed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: During the baseline audit period, 19.4 patients were seen per 240-minute clinic session. Median patient in-clinic time was 131 minutes with an interquartile range of 133 minutes (84-217 minutes, quartile 1- quartile 3). Targeted low/negligible cost solutions were implemented to reduce in-clinic times. During the post-implementation audit period, the number of patients seen per session increased 9% to 21.1 (p = 0.016). There was significant reduction in duration (p < 0.001) and variability (p < 0.001) of patient in-clinic time (median 107 minutes, interquartile range 91 minutes [71-162 minutes]). CONCLUSIONS: Lean Six Sigma techniques may be used to reduce duration and variability of patient in-clinic time and increase service capacity in outpatient ophthalmology clinics without additional resource input.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lean; Lean Six Sigma; Ophthalmology; Outpatients; Patient waiting times; Public health; Service improvement; Six Sigma
Authors: Thomas A Ciulla; Mohan V Tatikonda; Yehya A ElMaraghi; Rehan M Hussain; Amanda L Hill; Julie M Clary; Eyas Hattab Journal: Retina Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Giovanni Improta; Giovanni Balato; Maria Romano; Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione; Eliana Raiola; Mario Alessandro Russo; Patrizia Cuccaro; Liberatina Carmela Santillo; Mario Cesarelli Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Dinesh S Pashankar; Troy Brown; Paul Votto; Marie Follo; Richard N Formica; Michael L Schilsky; David C Mulligan; Babar Khokhar Journal: J Patient Exp Date: 2022-04-06