Chisom Obiezu-Umeh1, Titilola Gbajabiamila2, Oliver Ezechi2, Ucheoma Nwaozuru3, Jason J Ong4,5, Ifeoma Idigbe2, David Oladele2, Adesola Z Musa2, Florida Uzoaru3, Collins Airhihenbuwa6, Joseph D Tucker4,7, Juliet Iwelunmor3. 1. College for public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA. Chisom.obiezuumeh@slu.edu. 2. Department of Clinical Sciences National Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria. 3. College for public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA. 4. Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 5. Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Australia. 6. School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 7. Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) provides young people with a convenient, discreet, and empowering way to know their HIV status. However, there is limited knowledge of young people's preferences for HIVST services and potential factors that may influence the uptake of HIVST among this population. The purpose of this research was to use qualitative methods to examine HIVST preferences among Nigerian youth. METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of young people 14-24 years old were conducted in Lagos, Nigeria. Data were analyzed thematically to identify themes and domains related to preferences and factors influencing the use of HIV self-testing. RESULTS: A total of 65 youth with mean age of 21 years, were interviewed, and the majority were females (56%). Four themes emerged as the most important characteristics that may influence young people's preferences for HIV self-testing: 1) Cost (i.e. majority of participants noted that they would pay between NGN500 to NGN1,500 naira (USD1.38-USD4.16) for oral HIV self-testing kits); 2) Testing method (i.e. although blood-based sample kits were more popular than oral-based self-testing kits, most preferred the oral-based option due to its perceived benefits and for some, phobia of needles); 3) Access location (i.e. participants suggested they preferred to obtain the HIVST kits from youth-friendly centers, pharmacies, private health facilities, and online stores); and 4) Continuing care and support (i.e. participants highlighted the importance of linkage to care with trained youth health workers for positive or negative test results or toll-free helpline). CONCLUSION: HIV self-testing preferences among Nigerian youth appear to be influenced by several factors including lower cost, less invasive testing method, location of testing, and linkage to care and support post testing. Findings underscore the need to address young people's HIV self-testing preferences as a foundation for implementing programs and research to increase the uptake of HIVST.
BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) provides young people with a convenient, discreet, and empowering way to know their HIV status. However, there is limited knowledge of young people's preferences for HIVST services and potential factors that may influence the uptake of HIVST among this population. The purpose of this research was to use qualitative methods to examine HIVST preferences among Nigerian youth. METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of young people 14-24 years old were conducted in Lagos, Nigeria. Data were analyzed thematically to identify themes and domains related to preferences and factors influencing the use of HIV self-testing. RESULTS: A total of 65 youth with mean age of 21 years, were interviewed, and the majority were females (56%). Four themes emerged as the most important characteristics that may influence young people's preferences for HIV self-testing: 1) Cost (i.e. majority of participants noted that they would pay between NGN500 to NGN1,500 naira (USD1.38-USD4.16) for oral HIV self-testing kits); 2) Testing method (i.e. although blood-based sample kits were more popular than oral-based self-testing kits, most preferred the oral-based option due to its perceived benefits and for some, phobia of needles); 3) Access location (i.e. participants suggested they preferred to obtain the HIVST kits from youth-friendly centers, pharmacies, private health facilities, and online stores); and 4) Continuing care and support (i.e. participants highlighted the importance of linkage to care with trained youth health workers for positive or negative test results or toll-free helpline). CONCLUSION: HIV self-testing preferences among Nigerian youth appear to be influenced by several factors including lower cost, less invasive testing method, location of testing, and linkage to care and support post testing. Findings underscore the need to address young people's HIV self-testing preferences as a foundation for implementing programs and research to increase the uptake of HIVST.
Entities:
Keywords:
HIV; HIV self-testing; LMICs; Nigeria; Youth
Authors: Pitchaya P Indravudh; Euphemia L Sibanda; Marc d'Elbée; Moses K Kumwenda; Beate Ringwald; Galven Maringwa; Musonda Simwinga; Lot J Nyirenda; Cheryl C Johnson; Karin Hatzold; Fern Terris-Prestholt; Miriam Taegtmeyer Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Chama Mulubwa; Bernadette Hensen; Mwelwa M Phiri; Kwame Shanaube; Albertus J Schaap; Sian Floyd; Comfort R Phiri; Chiti Bwalya; Virginia Bond; Musonda Simwinga; Lawrence Mwenge; Sarah Fidler; Richard Hayes; Alwyn Mwinga; Helen Ayles Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 16.070
Authors: Bernard Njau; Christopher Covin; Esther Lisasi; Damian Damian; Declare Mushi; Andrew Boulle; Catherine Mathews Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: C Johnson; R Baggaley; S Forsythe; H van Rooyen; N Ford; S Napierala Mavedzenge; E Corbett; P Natarajan; M Taegtmeyer Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-07
Authors: Augustine T Choko; Peter MacPherson; Emily L Webb; Barbara A Willey; Helena Feasy; Rodrick Sambakunsi; Aaron Mdolo; Simon D Makombe; Nicola Desmond; Richard Hayes; Hendramoorthy Maheswaran; Elizabeth L Corbett Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Augustine T Choko; Muhammad S Jamil; Peter MacPherson; Elizabeth Corbett; Lastone Chitembo; Heather Ingold; Elkin Bermudez Aza; Marc d'Elbee; Meghan DiCarlo; Mohammed Majam; Tanya Schewchuk; Vincent Wong; Rachel Baggaley; Cheryl Johnson Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 6.707
Authors: Juliet Iwelunmor; Joseph D Tucker; Chisom Obiezu-Umeh; Titilola Gbaja-Biamila; David Oladele; Ucheoma Nwaozuru; Adesola Z Musa; Collins O Airhihenbuwa; Kathryn Muessig; Nora Rosenberg; Rhonda BeLue; Hong Xian; Donaldson F Conserve; Jason J Ong; Lei Zhang; Jamie Curley; Susan Nkengasong; Stacey Mason; Weiming Tang; Barry Bayus; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Oliver Ezechi Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 2.261
Authors: David Oladele; Juliet Iwelunmor; Titilola Gbajabiamila; Chisom Obiezu-Umeh; Jane Ogoamaka Okwuzu; Ucheoma Nwaozuru; Adesola Zaidat Musa; Ifeoma Idigbe; Kadija Tahlil; Weiming Tang; Donaldson F Conserve; Nora E Rosenberg; Agatha N David; Joseph Tucker; Oliver Ezechi Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2021-11-17
Authors: Maxwell O Akanbi; Lucy A Bilaver; Chad Achenbach; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Adovich S Rivera; Olugbenga A Silas; Patricia A Agaba; Oche Agbaji; Nathan Y Shehu; Solomon A Sagay; Lifang Hou; Robert L Murphy Journal: Infect Agent Cancer Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 2.965
Authors: Cherie Cawood; Simon Cousens; Isolde Birdthistle; Sarah Mulwa; Sophie Sarrassat; Venetia Baker; David Khanyile; Dominique O'Donnell Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2022-04