Shiyan Yan1, Rui Xu2, Terry D Stratton3, Voyko Kavcic4, Dan Luo5, Fengsu Hou6, Fengying Bi5, Rong Jiao7, Kangxing Song8, Yang Jiang3. 1. School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China. 2. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China. anxietypsy@163.com. 3. Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. 4. Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. 5. School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, 410078, Hunan, China. 6. Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Guangzhou, 518020, China. 7. The First Clinical College, Hainan Meidical University, Haikou, 570100, China. 8. The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China. skx301@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: About 83,000 COVID-19 patients were confirmed in China up to May 2020. Amid the well-documented threats to physical health, the effects of this public health crisis - and the varied efforts to contain its spread - have altered individuals' "normal" daily functioning. These impacts on social, psychological, and emotional well-being remain relatively unexplored - in particular, the ways in which Chinese men and women experience and respond to potential behavioral stressors. Our study investigated sex differences in psychological stress, emotional reactions, and behavioral responses to COVID-19 and related threats among Chinese residents. METHODS: In late February (2020), an anonymous online questionnaire was disseminated via WeChat, a popular social media platform in China. The cross-sectional study utilized a non-probabilistic "snowball" or convenience sampling of residents from various provinces and regions of China. Basic demographic characteristics (e.g., age and gender) - along with residential living arrangements and conditions - were measured along with psychological stress and emotional responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Three thousand eighty-eight questionnaires were returned: 1749 females (56.6%) and 1339 males (43.4%). The mean stress level,as measured by a visual analog scale, was 3.4 (SD = 2.4) - but differed significantly by sex. Besides sex, factors positively associated with stress included: age (< 45 years), employment (unsteady income, unemployed), risk of infection (exposureto COVID-19, completed medical observation), difficulties encountered (diseases, work/study, financial, mental), and related behaviors (higher desire for COVID-19 knowledge, more time concerning on the COVID-19 outbreak). "Protective" factors included frequent contact with colleagues, calmness of mood comparing with the pre-pandemic, and psychological resilience. Males and females also differed significantly in adapting to current living/working, conditions, responding to run a fever, and needing psychological support services. CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported stress of Chinese residents related to the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly related to sex, age, employment, resilience and coping styles. Future responses to such public health threats may wish to provide sex- and/or age-appropriate supports for psychological health and emotional well-being to those at greatest risk of experiencing stress.
BACKGROUND: About 83,000 COVID-19patients were confirmed in China up to May 2020. Amid the well-documented threats to physical health, the effects of this public health crisis - and the varied efforts to contain its spread - have altered individuals' "normal" daily functioning. These impacts on social, psychological, and emotional well-being remain relatively unexplored - in particular, the ways in which Chinese men and women experience and respond to potential behavioral stressors. Our study investigated sex differences in psychological stress, emotional reactions, and behavioral responses to COVID-19 and related threats among Chinese residents. METHODS: In late February (2020), an anonymous online questionnaire was disseminated via WeChat, a popular social media platform in China. The cross-sectional study utilized a non-probabilistic "snowball" or convenience sampling of residents from various provinces and regions of China. Basic demographic characteristics (e.g., age and gender) - along with residential living arrangements and conditions - were measured along with psychological stress and emotional responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Three thousand eighty-eight questionnaires were returned: 1749 females (56.6%) and 1339 males (43.4%). The mean stress level,as measured by a visual analog scale, was 3.4 (SD = 2.4) - but differed significantly by sex. Besides sex, factors positively associated with stress included: age (< 45 years), employment (unsteady income, unemployed), risk of infection (exposureto COVID-19, completed medical observation), difficulties encountered (diseases, work/study, financial, mental), and related behaviors (higher desire for COVID-19 knowledge, more time concerning on the COVID-19 outbreak). "Protective" factors included frequent contact with colleagues, calmness of mood comparing with the pre-pandemic, and psychological resilience. Males and females also differed significantly in adapting to current living/working, conditions, responding to run a fever, and needing psychological support services. CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported stress of Chinese residents related to the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly related to sex, age, employment, resilience and coping styles. Future responses to such public health threats may wish to provide sex- and/or age-appropriate supports for psychological health and emotional well-being to those at greatest risk of experiencing stress.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Psychological resilience; Psychological stress; Sex differences
Authors: Aya Ishiguro; Machiko Inoue; Jane Fisher; Mariko Inoue; Shoko Matsumoto; Kazue Yamaoka Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Jill M Goldstein; Katie Lancaster; Julia M Longenecker; Brandon Abbs; Laura M Holsen; Sara Cherkerzian; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Nicolas Makris; Ming T Tsuang; Stephen L Buka; Larry J Seidman; Anne Klibanski Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Michael L Tee; Cherica A Tee; Joseph P Anlacan; Katrina Joy G Aligam; Patrick Wincy C Reyes; Vipat Kuruchittham; Roger C Ho Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Dominika Grygarová; Petr Adámek; Veronika Juríčková; Jiří Horáček; Eduard Bakštein; Iveta Fajnerová; Ladislav Kesner Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2022-06-28
Authors: Hosam Alzahrani; Fahad Alshehri; Muhsen Alsufiany; Hatem H Allam; Rania Almeheyawi; Marwa M Eid; Kabir P Sadarangani Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-10 Impact factor: 3.390