Josephine Obel1,2, Antonio Isidro Carrion Martin3, Abdul Wasay Mullahzada4,5, Ronald Kremer5, Nanna Maaløe6. 1. Médecins Sans Frontières, Saana, Yemen. jobel@dadlnet.dk. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. jobel@dadlnet.dk. 3. Médecins Sans Frontières, London, UK. 4. Médecins Sans Frontières, Saana, Yemen. 5. Médecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fragile and conflict-affected states contribute with more than 60% of the global burden of maternal mortality. There is an alarming need for research exploring maternal health service access and quality and adaptive responses during armed conflict. Taiz Houbane Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Yemen was established during the war as such adaptive response. However, as number of births vastly exceeded the facility's pre-dimensioned capacity, a policy was implemented to restrict admissions. We here assess the restriction's effects on the quality of intrapartum care and birth outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective before and after study was conducted of all women giving birth in a high-volume month pre-restriction (August 2017; n = 1034) and a low-volume month post-restriction (November 2017; n = 436). Birth outcomes were assessed for all births (mode of birth, stillbirths, intra-facility neonatal deaths, and Apgar score < 7). Quality of intrapartum care was assessed by a criterion-based audit of all caesarean sections (n = 108 and n = 82) and of 250 randomly selected vaginal births in each month. RESULTS: Background characteristics of women were comparable between the months. Rates of labour inductions and caesarean sections increased significantly in the low-volume month (14% vs. 22% (relative risk (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.87) and 11% vs. 19% (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.71)). No other care or birth outcome indicators were significantly different. Structural and human resources remained constant throughout, despite differences in patient volume. CONCLUSIONS: Assumptions regarding quality of care in periods of high demand may be misguiding - resilience to maintain quality of care was strong. We recommend health actors to closely monitor changes in quality of care when implementing resource changes; to enable safe care during birth for as many women as possible.
BACKGROUND:Fragile and conflict-affected states contribute with more than 60% of the global burden of maternal mortality. There is an alarming need for research exploring maternal health service access and quality and adaptive responses during armed conflict. Taiz Houbane Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Yemen was established during the war as such adaptive response. However, as number of births vastly exceeded the facility's pre-dimensioned capacity, a policy was implemented to restrict admissions. We here assess the restriction's effects on the quality of intrapartum care and birth outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective before and after study was conducted of all women giving birth in a high-volume month pre-restriction (August 2017; n = 1034) and a low-volume month post-restriction (November 2017; n = 436). Birth outcomes were assessed for all births (mode of birth, stillbirths, intra-facility neonatal deaths, and Apgar score < 7). Quality of intrapartum care was assessed by a criterion-based audit of all caesarean sections (n = 108 and n = 82) and of 250 randomly selected vaginal births in each month. RESULTS: Background characteristics of women were comparable between the months. Rates of labour inductions and caesarean sections increased significantly in the low-volume month (14% vs. 22% (relative risk (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.87) and 11% vs. 19% (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.71)). No other care or birth outcome indicators were significantly different. Structural and human resources remained constant throughout, despite differences inpatient volume. CONCLUSIONS: Assumptions regarding quality of care in periods of high demand may be misguiding - resilience to maintain quality of care was strong. We recommend health actors to closely monitor changes in quality of care when implementing resource changes; to enable safe care during birth for as many women as possible.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adaptive response; Armed conflict; Caesarean section; Childbirth; Fragile and conflict-affected states; Humanitarian response; Quality of care; Yemen
Authors: N Maaløe; N Housseine; T Meguid; B B Nielsen; Akg Jensen; R S Khamis; A G Mohamed; M M Ali; S M Said; J van Roosmalen; I C Bygbjerg Journal: BJOG Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Safieh Shah; Rafael Van den Bergh; Jeanne Rene Prinsloo; Gulalai Rehman; Amna Bibi; Neelam Shaeen; Rosa Auat; Sabina Mutindi Daudi; Joyce Wanjiru Njenga; Tahir Bashir-Ud-Din Khilji; Jacob Maïkéré; Eva De Plecker; Séverine Caluwaerts; Rony Zachariah; Catherine Van Overloop Journal: Int Health Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: O T Oladapo; O O Adetoro; B A Ekele; C Chama; S J Etuk; A P Aboyeji; H E Onah; A M Abasiattai; A N Adamu; O Adegbola; A S Adeniran; C O Aimakhu; O Akinsanya; L D Aliyu; A B Ande; A Ashimi; M Bwala; A Fabamwo; A D Geidam; J I Ikechebelu; J O Imaralu; O Kuti; D Nwachukwu; L Omo-Aghoja; K Tunau; J Tukur; Ouj Umeora; A C Umezulike; O A Dada; Ӧ Tunçalp; J P Vogel; A M Gülmezoglu Journal: BJOG Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Lilian T Mselle; Karen Marie Moland; Abu Mvungi; Bjorg Evjen-Olsen; Thecla W Kohi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Yahya Ali Gaber; Rukaih Al-Sanabani; Dhekra Amin Annuzaili; Abdullah Al-Danakh; Li Chun Ling Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 1.792